Cytopathology in the era of social media.
Facebook
Instagram
LinkedIn
Twitter X
collaboration
cytopathology
cytopathology hashtags
cytopathology journals
digital cytopathology
education
global cytopathology
professional networking
social media platforms
Journal
Diagnostic cytopathology
ISSN: 1097-0339
Titre abrégé: Diagn Cytopathol
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 8506895
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
07 May 2024
07 May 2024
Historique:
revised:
22
04
2024
received:
11
03
2024
accepted:
25
04
2024
medline:
7
5
2024
pubmed:
7
5
2024
entrez:
7
5
2024
Statut:
aheadofprint
Résumé
In today's medical landscape, social media (SoMe) platforms have expanded their reach beyond mere communication and entertainment, making a significant impact in the pathology field, including cytopathology. In recent years, SoMe platforms have become increasingly adopted by cytopathologists, facilitating continued education, professional networking, enhancing patient engagement, and entertainment. This adoption has influenced the professional growth of cytopathologists, and at its best, has led to the establishment of a robust professional online presence and ultimately contributed to leadership positions, fellowship opportunities, and academic promotions. Moreover, the integration of SoMe into the academic field has shown a profound impact on the visibility of academic journals and has provided a platform for lower-impact factor journals to expand their reach, ultimately increasing article citation rates and positively contributing to journal impact factor growth. SoMe platforms created a modern avenue for conference networking that has revolutionized knowledge dissemination and enhanced real-time engagement. The advantages of SoMe have extended to a global scale, positively enhancing professional expertise sharing, facilitating effective communication and teleconsultation worldwide, and reaching developing countries. Drawing insights from the recent medical literature and the practical insight from the experts' personal experience, this article provides a comprehensive review of how SoMe and cytopathology intersect to create new opportunities, facilitating informed discussions, global collaboration, and advancements in the field of cytopathology. This article also delves into the challenges surrounding SoMe platform navigation and addresses ethical and regulatory concerns, providing guidelines on what to post and what not to post on SoMe platforms.
Types de publication
Journal Article
Review
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Informations de copyright
© 2024 Wiley Periodicals LLC.
Références
Oltulu P, Mannan AASR, Gardner JM. Effective use of twitter and Facebook in pathology practice. Hum Pathol. 2018;73:128‐143. doi:10.1016/j.humpath.2017.12.017
Mazer BL, Fuller MY, Lepe M, et al. Social Media in Pathology: continuing a tradition of dialogue and education. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2018;142(8):889‐890. doi:10.5858/arpa.2018‐0057‐LE
Misialek MJ, Allen TC. You're on social media! So now what? Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2016;140(5):393. doi:10.5858/arpa.2015‐0493‐ED
Fuller MY, Allen TC. Let's have a tweetup: the case for using twitter professionally. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2016;140(9):956‐957. doi:10.5858/arpa.2016‐0172‐SA
Fuller MY, Gardner JM, Jiang XS. Social cytopathology: building a stronger cytopathology community through social media. Cancer Cytopathol. 2017;125(12):891‐895. doi:10.1002/cncy.21940
Lepe M, Gardner JM. Fine social aspiration: twitter as a voice for cytopathology. Diagn Cytopathol. 2017;45(8):705‐713. doi:10.1002/dc.23713
Gonzalez RS, Amer SM, Yahia NB, et al. Facebook discussion groups provide a robust worldwide platform for free pathology education. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2017;141(5):690‐695. doi:10.5858/arpa.2016‐0369‐OA
Schukow CP, Punjabi LS, Abdul‐Karim FW. #PathX: #PathTwitter's transformation and a discussion on different social media platforms used by pathologists in 2024. Adv Anat Pathol. Published online December 4. 2023. doi:10.1097/PAP.0000000000000424
Expósito‐Afonso IJ, Alcaraz‐Mateos E, Labiano T, et al. #FNAFriday: how cytopathologists learn, teach, and share knowledge on twitter. Diagn Cytopathol. 2020;48(8):706‐710. doi:10.1002/dc.24461
Fuller MY, Roy‐Chowdhuri S. Social media expands the reach of the 2017 ASC annual meeting. J Am Soc Cytopathol. 2018;7(4):219‐223. doi:10.1016/j.jasc.2018.03.001
Accessed March 4, 2024. https://www.facebook.com/cytopathology/
Deeken AH, Mukhopadhyay S, Jiang “Sara” X. Social media in academics and research: 21st‐century tools to turbocharge education, collaboration, and dissemination of research findings. Histopathology. 2020;77(5):688‐699. doi:10.1111/his.14196
Peoples BK, Midway SR, Sackett D, Lynch A, Cooney PB. Twitter predicts citation rates of ecological research. PLoS One. 2016;11(11):e0166570. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0166570
Baskota SU, Jenkins J, Hogan M, Rezaei MK. Live presentation and Twitterchat as helpful tools for audience engagement‐an experience from American Society of Cytopathology (ASC)‐eJournal committee. J Am Soc Cytopathol. 2023;12(5):S11‐S12. doi:10.1016/j.jasc.2023.07.019
Freitag CE, Arnold MA, Gardner JM, Arnold CA. If you are not on social media, Here's what You're missing! #DoTheThing. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2017;141(11):1567‐1576. doi:10.5858/arpa.2016‐0612‐SA
Hayon S, Tripathi H, Stormont IM, Dunne MM, Naslund MJ, Siddiqui MM. Twitter mentions and academic citations in the urologic literature. Urology. 2019;123:28‐33. doi:10.1016/j.urology.2018.08.041
Eysenbach G. Can tweets predict citations? Metrics of social impact based on twitter and correlation with traditional metrics of scientific impact. J Med Internet Res. 2011;13(4):e123. doi:10.2196/jmir.2012
Twitter Article Mentions and Citations: An Exploratory Analysis of Publications in the American Journal of Psychiatry—PubMed. Accessed February 28, 2024 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/26844798/
Deshpande N, Crossley JR, Malekzadeh S. Association between twitter mentions and academic citations in otolaryngology literature. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2022;167(1):73‐78. doi:10.1177/01945998211044680
Demir HA, Dogan S. Correlation between academic citations in emergency medicine journals and twitter mentions. Am J Emerg Med. 2022;58:33‐38. doi:10.1016/j.ajem.2022.05.027
Chau M, Ramedani S, King T, Aziz F. Presence of social media mentions for vascular surgery publications is associated with an increased number of literature citations. J Vasc Surg. 2021;73(3):1096‐1103. doi:10.1016/j.jvs.2020.09.029
Saleh J, Dahiya M. Social media trends in dermatology, dermatopathology, and pathology publications: the social construction of medical subdisciplines. J Cutan Pathol. 2020;47(7):601‐605. doi:10.1111/cup.13680
Shuai X, Pepe A, Bollen J. How the scientific community reacts to newly submitted preprints: article downloads, twitter mentions, and citations. PLoS One. 2012;7(11):e47523. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0047523
Jiang XS, Madrigal E. Innovations: innovating together while social distancing. Cancer Cytopathol. 2021;129(2):99‐101. doi:10.1002/cncy.22325
#InSituPathologists: how the #USCAP2015 meeting went viral on Twitter and founded the social media movement for the United States and Canadian Academy of Pathology—PubMed. Accessed February 28, 2024 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/28084341/
Nguyen BM, Lu E, Bhuyan N, Lin K, Sevilla M. Social Media for Doctors: taking professional and patient engagement to the next level. Fam Pract Manag. 2020;27(1):14‐19.
Folaranmi OO, Ibiyeye KM, Odetunde OA, Kerr DA. The influence of social Media in Promoting Knowledge Acquisition and Pathology Excellence in Nigeria. Front Med. 2022;9:906950. doi:10.3389/fmed.2022.906950
Schukow CP, McKee PH. Knowledge in knowledge out: a next‐generation platform intersecting social media with digital pathology. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2023;147(4):386‐389. doi:10.5858/arpa.2022‐0349‐ED
Evans AJ, Depeiza N, Allen SG, Fraser K, Shirley S, Chetty R. Use of whole slide imaging (WSI) for distance teaching. J Clin Pathol. 2021;74(7):425‐428. doi:10.1136/jclinpath‐2020‐206763
Crane GM, Gardner JM. Pathology image‐sharing on social media: recommendations for protecting privacy while motivating education. AMA J Ethics. 2016;18(8):817‐825. doi:10.1001/journalofethics.2016.18.8.stas1‐1608
Nelson B. Should pathology get more social?: a growing movement touts the power of social media for the profession. Cancer Cytopathol. 2011;119(5):291‐292. doi:10.1002/cncy.20193
Jiang XS, Madrigal E, Roy‐Chowdhuri S. A Twitter primer: dos and don’ts for cytopathologists. Diagn Cytopathol. 2017;45(7):577‐579. doi:10.1002/dc.23722
Fulcher MR, Bolton ML, Millican MD, et al. Broadening participation in scientific conferences during the era of social distancing. Trends Microbiol. 2020;28(12):949‐952. doi:10.1016/j.tim.2020.08.004
Peedin AR, Karp JK. Pathology and professionalism in the age of social media. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2018;142(4):441‐442. doi:10.5858/arpa.2017‐0467‐ED
Schukow C, Abdul‐Karim FW, Crane GM. Proper tweeting etiquette guidelines for pathologists, trainees, and medical students on #PathTwitter. Int J Surg Pathol. Published online August 3. 2023;10668969231186928. doi:10.1177/10668969231186927
Rose RV, Kumar A, Kass JS. Protecting privacy: health insurance portability and accountability act of 1996, twenty‐first century cures act, and social media. Neurol Clin. 2023;41(3):513‐522. doi:10.1016/j.ncl.2023.03.007
Gardner JM, Allen TC. Keep calm and tweet on: legal and ethical considerations for pathologists using social media. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2019;143(1):75‐80. doi:10.5858/arpa.2018‐0313‐SA
Moses RE, McNeese LG, Feld LD, Feld AD. Social media in the health‐care setting: benefits but also a minefield of compliance and other legal issues. Am J Gastroenterol. 2014;109(8):1128‐1132. doi:10.1038/ajg.2014.67
Kubheka B. Ethical and legal perspectives on the medical practitioners use of social media. S Afr Med J. 2017;107(5):386‐389. doi:10.7196/SAMJ.2017.v107i5.12047
Wells DM, Lehavot K, Isaac ML. Sounding off on social media: the ethics of patient storytelling in the modern era. Acad Med. 2015;90(8):1015‐1019. doi:10.1097/ACM.0000000000000668
O’Glasser AY, Jaffe RC, Brooks M. To tweet or not to tweet, that is the uestion. Semin Nephrol. 2020;40(3):249‐263. doi:10.1016/j.semnephrol.2020.04.003
Jang H, Barrett B, McGregor SC. Social media policy in two dimensions: understanding the role of anti‐establishment beliefs and political ideology in Americans’ attribution of responsibility regarding online content. Inf Commun Soc. 2023;1‐26. doi:10.1080/1369118X.2023.2234970