Diabetes mellitus in pregnancy across Canada.


Journal

BMC pregnancy and childbirth
ISSN: 1471-2393
Titre abrégé: BMC Pregnancy Childbirth
Pays: England
ID NLM: 100967799

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
07 May 2024
Historique:
received: 15 11 2023
accepted: 21 04 2024
medline: 8 5 2024
pubmed: 8 5 2024
entrez: 7 5 2024
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Contemporary estimates of diabetes mellitus (DM) rates in pregnancy are lacking in Canada. Accordingly, this study examined trends in the rates of type 1 (T1DM), type 2 (T2DM) and gestational (GDM) DM in Canada over a 15-year period, and selected adverse pregnancy outcomes. This study used repeated cross-sectional data from the Canadian Institute of Health Information (CIHI) hospitalization discharge abstract database (DAD). Maternal delivery records were linked to their respective birth records from 2006 to 2019. The prevalence of T1DM, T2DM and GDM were calculated, including relative changes over time, assessed by a Cochrane-Armitage test. Also assessed were differences between provinces and territories in the prevalence of DM. Over the 15-year study period, comprising 4,320,778 hospital deliveries in Canada, there was a statistically significant increase in the prevalence of GDM and T1DM and T2DM. Compared to pregnancies without DM, all pregnancies with any form of DM had higher rates of hypertension and Caesarian delivery, and also adverse infant outcomes, including major congenital anomalies, preterm birth and large-for-gestational age birthweight. Among 4.3 million pregnancies in Canada, there has been a rise in the prevalence of DM. T2DM and GDM are expected to increase further as more overweight women conceive in Canada.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
Contemporary estimates of diabetes mellitus (DM) rates in pregnancy are lacking in Canada. Accordingly, this study examined trends in the rates of type 1 (T1DM), type 2 (T2DM) and gestational (GDM) DM in Canada over a 15-year period, and selected adverse pregnancy outcomes.
METHODS METHODS
This study used repeated cross-sectional data from the Canadian Institute of Health Information (CIHI) hospitalization discharge abstract database (DAD). Maternal delivery records were linked to their respective birth records from 2006 to 2019. The prevalence of T1DM, T2DM and GDM were calculated, including relative changes over time, assessed by a Cochrane-Armitage test. Also assessed were differences between provinces and territories in the prevalence of DM.
RESULTS RESULTS
Over the 15-year study period, comprising 4,320,778 hospital deliveries in Canada, there was a statistically significant increase in the prevalence of GDM and T1DM and T2DM. Compared to pregnancies without DM, all pregnancies with any form of DM had higher rates of hypertension and Caesarian delivery, and also adverse infant outcomes, including major congenital anomalies, preterm birth and large-for-gestational age birthweight.
CONCLUSION CONCLUSIONS
Among 4.3 million pregnancies in Canada, there has been a rise in the prevalence of DM. T2DM and GDM are expected to increase further as more overweight women conceive in Canada.

Identifiants

pubmed: 38714923
doi: 10.1186/s12884-024-06534-8
pii: 10.1186/s12884-024-06534-8
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

349

Informations de copyright

© 2024. Crown.

Références

Wahabi HA, Esmaeil SA, Fayed A, Al-Shaikh G, Alzeidan RA. Pre-existing diabetes mellitus and adverse pregnancy outcomes. 2012;5:496. https://doi.org/10.1186/1756-0500-5-496
Canada. PHA of. Perinatal Health Report. Ottawa, ON: Government of Canada; 2013.
Imperatore G, Boyle JP, Thompson TJ, Case D, Dabelea D, Hamman RF, et al. Projections of type 1 and type 2 diabetes burden in the U.S. population aged < 20 years through 2050: dynamic modeling of incidence, mortality, and population growth. United States. 2012;35:2515–20.
Martin B, Sacks DA. The global burden of hyperglycemia in pregnancy – Trends from studies in the last decade. 2018;145:17–9. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S016882271830490X
Information CI. for H. Data Quality Documentation, Discharge Abstract database. [cited 2023 Feb 21]; https://www.cihi.ca/sites/default/files/document/dad-data-quality-current-year-information-2020-2021-en.pdf
Health Mof. Diabetes Care - Province of British Columbia [Internet]. Province of British Columbia; [cited 2023 Feb 27]. https://www2.gov.bc.ca/gov/content/health/practitioner-professional-resources/bc-guidelines/diabetes
Stanhope KK, Joseph NT, Platner M, Hutchison C, Wen S, Laboe A, et al. Validation of ICD-10 codes for gestational and pregestational diabetes during pregnancy in a large, Public Hospital. Volume 32. United States: Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc; 2021. pp. 277–81.
Getahun D, Fassett MJ, Jacobsen SJ. Gestational diabetes: risk of recurrence in subsequent pregnancies. 2010;203:467.e1-467.e6. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0002937810006757
Canada S. Tables 13-10-0429-01 Live Births and fetal deaths (stillbirths) by place of birth (hospital or non-hospital) [Internet]. 2023. https://www150.statcan.gc.ca/t1/tbl1/en/tv.action?pid=1310042801
Mobasseri M, Shirmohammadi M, Amiri T, Vahed N, Hosseini Fard H, Ghojazadeh M. Prevalence and incidence of type 1 diabetes in the world: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Maad Rayan Publishing Company; 2020. p. 98.
Kramer MS, Platt RW, Wen SW, Joseph KS, Allen A, Abrahamowicz M et al. A new and improved population-based Canadian reference for birth weight for gestational age. 2001;108:E35.
Zhuang W, Lv J, Liang Q, Chen W, Zhang S, Sun X. Adverse effects of gestational diabetes-related risk factors on pregnancy outcomes and intervention measures. Athens: Spandidos Publications; 2020;20:3361–7. https://search.proquest.com/docview/2442166962
Berger H, Gagnon R, Sermer M, Guideline. No 393-Diabetes Pregnancy. 2019;41:1814–25. e1.
Peng TY, Ehrlich SF, Crites Y, Kitzmiller JL, Kuzniewicz MW, Hedderson MM et al. Trends and racial and ethnic disparities in the prevalence of pregestational type 1 and type 2 diabetes in Northern California: 1996–2014. 2017;216:177.e1-177.e8. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0002937816308705
Negrato CA, Mattar R, Gomes MB. Adverse pregnancy outcomes in women with diabetes. 2012;4:41. https://doi.org/10.1186/1758-5996-4-41
Diabetes. in Canada [Internet]. [cited 2023 Sep 9]. https://www.diabetes.ca/advocacy---policies/advocacy-reports/national-and-provincial-backgrounders/diabetes-in-canada
Shojaeian A. An overview of the Epidemiology of Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus. 2018.
Dabelea D, Mayer-Davis EJ, Saydah S, Imperatore G, Linder B, Divers J et al. Prevalence of Type 1 and Type 2 Diabetes Among Children and Adolescents From 2001 to 2009. 2014 [cited 2023];311:1778–86. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2014.3201
Bancej C, Jayabalasingham B, Wall RW, Rao DP, Do MT, de Groh M, et al. Evidence brief–trends and projections of obesity among canadians. Canada. 2015;35:109–12.
Yeung RO, Savu A, Kinniburgh B, Lee L, Dzakpasu S, Nelson C et al. Prevalence of gestational diabetes among Chinese and South Asians: A Canadian population-based analysis. 2017;31:529–36. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1056872716307292
The Hyperglycemia and Adverse Pregnancy Outcome (HAPO). Study - ScienceDirect. [cited 2023 Feb 21]; https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0020729202000929
Canada PHA. of. Diabetes in Canada [Internet]. 2017 [cited 2023 Aug 10]. https://www.canada.ca/en/public-health/services/publications/diseases-conditions/diabetes-canada-highlights-chronic-disease-surveillance-system.html
Craig ME, Kim KW, Isaacs SR, Penno MA, Hamilton-Williams EE, Couper JJ, et al. Early-life factors contributing to type 1 diabetes. Springer. 2019;62:1823–34.
Coton SJ, Nazareth I, Petersen I. A cohort study of trends in the prevalence of pregestational diabetes in pregnancy recorded in UK general practice between 1995 and 2012. England. 2016;6:e009494–2015.
Berger H, Crane J, Farine D, Armson A, De La Ronde S, Keenan-Lindsay L et al. Screening for gestational diabetes mellitus. 2002;24:894–912.
Russell C, Dodds L, Armson BA, Kephart G, Joseph KS. Diabetes mellitus following gestational diabetes: role of subsequent pregnancy. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd; 2008;115:253–60. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-0528.2007.01459.x
Cho NH, Shaw JE, Karuranga S, Huang Y, da Rocha Fernandes JD, Ohlrogge AW et al. IDF Diabetes Atlas: Global estimates of diabetes prevalence for 2017 and projections for 2045. 2018;138:271–81. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0168822718302031
Mackin ST, Nelson SM, Kerssens JJ, Wood R, Wild S, Colhoun HM et al. Diabetes and pregnancy: national trends over a 15 year period. 2018;61:1081–8. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00125-017-4529-3
Dabelea D, Hanson RL, Bennett PH, Roumain J, Knowler WC, Pettitt DJ. Increasing prevalence of type II diabetes in American Indian children. Germany. 1998;41:904–10.
Organization WH. No title.
Fadl HE, Simmons D. Trends in diabetes in pregnancy in Sweden 1998–2012. 2016;4:e000221. http://drc.bmj.com/content/4/1/e000221.abstract
Canada PHA. of. Congenital Anomalies in Canada [Internet]. 2023 [cited 2023 Sep 9]. https://health-infobase.canada.ca/congenital-anomalies/Index
Committee DCCPGE, Feig DS, Berger H, Donovan L, Godbout A, Kader T et al. Diabetes and Pregnancy. Canada; 2018;S255–82.
Bowker SL, Savu A, Lam NK, Johnson JA, Kaul P. Validation of administrative data case definitions for gestational diabetes mellitus. England: Diabetes UK; 2017;34:51–5.
Jonathan ACS, Ian RW, John BC, Spratt M, Royston P, Michael GK et al. Multiple imputation for missing data in epidemiological and clinical research: potential and pitfalls. 2009;338:b2393. http://www.bmj.com/content/338/bmj.b2393.abstract
Berger H, Gagnon R, Sermer M. Guideline 393-diabetes in pregnancy. Elsevier. 2019;41:1814–25. e1.
Discharge. Abstract Database metadata (DAD) | CIHI [Internet]. [cited 2023 Feb 21]. https://www.cihi.ca/en/discharge-abstract-database-metadata-dad
Liu S, Joseph KS, Liston RM, Bartholomew S, Walker M, León JA, et al. Incidence, risk factors, and associated complications of eclampsia. LWW. 2011;118:987–94.

Auteurs

Chantal Rm Nelson (CR)

Maternal and Infant Health Section, Centre for Surveillance and Applied Research, Public Health Agency of Canada, 785 Carling Ave, Ottawa, ON, Canada. chantal.nelson@phac-aspc.gc.ca.

Susie Dzakpasu (S)

Maternal and Infant Health Section, Centre for Surveillance and Applied Research, Public Health Agency of Canada, 785 Carling Ave, Ottawa, ON, Canada.

Aideen M Moore (AM)

Department of Paediatrics, The Hospital for Sick Children and University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.

Elizabeth K Darling (EK)

McMaster Midwifery Research Centre, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada.

Wesley Edwards (W)

Department of Anesthesia and Pain Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada.

Phil Murphy (P)

Newfoundland and Labrador Health Services CA, St. John's, Newfoundland and Labrador, St. John's, Canada.

Heather Scott (H)

Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Dalhousie University, IWK Health Centre, Halifax, NS, Canada.

Michiel Van Den Hof (M)

Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Dalhousie University, IWK Health Centre, Halifax, NS, Canada.

Joel G Ray (JG)

Departments of Medicine, Health Policy Management and Evaluation, and Obstetrics and Gynaecology, St Michael's Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH