Impact of interventions to reduce nosocomial transmission of SARS-CoV-2 in English NHS Trusts: a computational modelling study.
Agent-based model
Healthcare-associated infection
IPC
Individual-based model
Infection prevention and control
Masking
Journal
BMC infectious diseases
ISSN: 1471-2334
Titre abrégé: BMC Infect Dis
Pays: England
ID NLM: 100968551
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
07 May 2024
07 May 2024
Historique:
received:
10
08
2023
accepted:
18
04
2024
medline:
8
5
2024
pubmed:
8
5
2024
entrez:
7
5
2024
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Prior to September 2021, 55,000-90,000 hospital inpatients in England were identified as having a potentially nosocomial SARS-CoV-2 infection. This includes cases that were likely missed due to pauci- or asymptomatic infection. Further, high numbers of healthcare workers (HCWs) are thought to have been infected, and there is evidence that some of these cases may also have been nosocomially linked, with both HCW to HCW and patient to HCW transmission being reported. From the start of the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic interventions in hospitals such as testing patients on admission and universal mask wearing were introduced to stop spread within and between patient and HCW populations, the effectiveness of which are largely unknown. Using an individual-based model of within-hospital transmission, we estimated the contribution of individual interventions (together and in combination) to the effectiveness of the overall package of interventions implemented in English hospitals during the COVID-19 pandemic. A panel of experts in infection prevention and control informed intervention choice and helped ensure the model reflected implementation in practice. Model parameters and associated uncertainty were derived using national and local data, literature review and formal elicitation of expert opinion. We simulated scenarios to explore how many nosocomial infections might have been seen in patients and HCWs if interventions had not been implemented. We simulated the time period from March-2020 to July-2022 encompassing different strains and multiple doses of vaccination. Modelling results suggest that in a scenario without inpatient testing, infection prevention and control measures, and reductions in occupancy and visitors, the number of patients developing a nosocomial SARS-CoV-2 infection could have been twice as high over the course of the pandemic, and over 600,000 HCWs could have been infected in the first wave alone. Isolation of symptomatic HCWs and universal masking by HCWs were the most effective interventions for preventing infections in both patient and HCW populations. Model findings suggest that collectively the interventions introduced over the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic in England averted 400,000 (240,000 - 500,000) infections in inpatients and 410,000 (370,000 - 450,000) HCW infections. Interventions to reduce the spread of nosocomial infections have varying impact, but the package of interventions implemented in England significantly reduced nosocomial transmission to both patients and HCWs over the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Prior to September 2021, 55,000-90,000 hospital inpatients in England were identified as having a potentially nosocomial SARS-CoV-2 infection. This includes cases that were likely missed due to pauci- or asymptomatic infection. Further, high numbers of healthcare workers (HCWs) are thought to have been infected, and there is evidence that some of these cases may also have been nosocomially linked, with both HCW to HCW and patient to HCW transmission being reported. From the start of the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic interventions in hospitals such as testing patients on admission and universal mask wearing were introduced to stop spread within and between patient and HCW populations, the effectiveness of which are largely unknown.
MATERIALS/METHODS
METHODS
Using an individual-based model of within-hospital transmission, we estimated the contribution of individual interventions (together and in combination) to the effectiveness of the overall package of interventions implemented in English hospitals during the COVID-19 pandemic. A panel of experts in infection prevention and control informed intervention choice and helped ensure the model reflected implementation in practice. Model parameters and associated uncertainty were derived using national and local data, literature review and formal elicitation of expert opinion. We simulated scenarios to explore how many nosocomial infections might have been seen in patients and HCWs if interventions had not been implemented. We simulated the time period from March-2020 to July-2022 encompassing different strains and multiple doses of vaccination.
RESULTS
RESULTS
Modelling results suggest that in a scenario without inpatient testing, infection prevention and control measures, and reductions in occupancy and visitors, the number of patients developing a nosocomial SARS-CoV-2 infection could have been twice as high over the course of the pandemic, and over 600,000 HCWs could have been infected in the first wave alone. Isolation of symptomatic HCWs and universal masking by HCWs were the most effective interventions for preventing infections in both patient and HCW populations. Model findings suggest that collectively the interventions introduced over the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic in England averted 400,000 (240,000 - 500,000) infections in inpatients and 410,000 (370,000 - 450,000) HCW infections.
CONCLUSIONS
CONCLUSIONS
Interventions to reduce the spread of nosocomial infections have varying impact, but the package of interventions implemented in England significantly reduced nosocomial transmission to both patients and HCWs over the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic.
Identifiants
pubmed: 38714946
doi: 10.1186/s12879-024-09330-z
pii: 10.1186/s12879-024-09330-z
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
475Subventions
Organisme : National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) Health Protection Research Unit (HPRU) in Modelling and Health Economics
ID : NIHR200908
Organisme : National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) Health Protection Research Unit (HPRU) in Modelling and Health Economics
ID : NIHR200908
Organisme : Medical Research Council (MRC) Centre for Global Infectious Disease Analysis
ID : MR/X020258/1
Organisme : National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) Health Protection Research Unit in Healthcare Associated Infections and Antimicrobial Resistance
ID : NIHR200915
Organisme : National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) Health Protection Research Unit in Healthcare Associated Infections and Antimicrobial Resistance
ID : NIHR200915
Informations de copyright
© 2024. Crown.
Références
Bhattacharya A, Collin SM, Stimson J, Thelwall S, Nsonwu O, Gerver S, et al. Healthcare-associated COVID-19 in England: A national data linkage study. J Infect. 2021;83(5):565–72.
doi: 10.1016/j.jinf.2021.08.039
pubmed: 34474055
pmcid: 8404398
Lindsey BB, Villabona-Arenas ChJ, Campbell F, Keeley AJ, Parker MD, Shah DR, et al. Characterising within-hospital SARS-CoV-2 transmission events using epidemiological and viral genomic data across two pandemic waves. Nat Commun. 2022;13(1):671.
doi: 10.1038/s41467-022-28291-y
pubmed: 35115517
pmcid: 8814040
Illingworth CJ, Hamilton WL, Warne B, Routledge M, Popay A, Jackson C, et al. Superspreaders drive the largest outbreaks of hospital onset COVID-19 infections. Walczak AM, Ogbunugafor CB, Cobey SE, editors. eLife. 2021;24(10):e67308.
doi: 10.7554/eLife.67308
Ellingford JM, George R, McDermott JH, Ahmad S, Edgerley JJ, Gokhale D, et al. Genomic and healthcare dynamics of nosocomial SARS-CoV-2 transmission. eLife. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8009659 /. Cited 2021 May 21;10
Stimson J, Pouwels KB, Hope R, Cooper BS, Presanis AM, Robotham JV. Estimation of the impact of hospital-onset SARS-CoV-2 infections on length of stay in English hospitals using causal inference. BMC Infect Dis. 2022;22(1):1–12.
doi: 10.1186/s12879-022-07870-w
Digital NHS. Hospital Episode Statistics (HES): Provisional Monthly Statistics for Admitted Patient Care, Outpatient and Accident & Emergency. Available from: https://data.gov.uk/dataset/c914f943-98d1-4dee-aba5-c40a7d08eefa/hospital-episode-statistics-hes-provisional-monthly-statistics-for-admitted-patient-care-outpatient-and-accident-emergency . Cited 2020 May 18.
May R, Powis S. Expansion of patient testing for Covid-19. 2020.
COVID-19: infection prevention and control (IPC). GOV.UK. Available from: https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/wuhan-novel-coronavirus-infection-prevention-and-control . Cited 2021 Mar 12.
Pople D, Monk EJM, Evans S, Foulkes S, Islam J, Wellington E, et al. Burden of SARS-CoV-2 infection in healthcare workers during second wave in England and impact of vaccines: prospective multicentre cohort study (SIREN) and mathematical model. BMJ. 2022;20(378): e070379.
doi: 10.1136/bmj-2022-070379
Evans S, Stimson J, Pople D, Bhattacharya A, Hope R, White PJ, et al. Quantifying the contribution of pathways of nosocomial acquisition of COVID-19 in English hospitals. Int J Epidemiol. 2022;51(2):393–403.
doi: 10.1093/ije/dyab241
pubmed: 34865043
Birrell P, Blake J, van Leeuwen E, Gent N, De Angelis D. Real-time nowcasting and forecasting of COVID-19 dynamics in England: the first wave. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences. 1829;2021(376):20200279.
Coronavirus » Novel coronavirus (COVID-19) standard operating procedure. Available from: https://www.england.nhs.uk/coronavirus/wp-content/uploads/sites/52/2020/11/C0873_i_SOP_LFD-rollout-for-asymptomatic-staff-testing_phase-2-trusts-v1.1_16-nov20.pdf . Cited 2020 Dec 1.
Quilty BJ, Clifford S, Hellewell J, Russell TW, Kucharski AJ, Flasche S, et al. Quarantine and testing strategies in contact tracing for SARS-CoV-2: a modelling study. Lancet Public Health. 2021;6(3):e175–83.
doi: 10.1016/S2468-2667(20)30308-X
pubmed: 33484644
pmcid: 7826085
May R, Powis S, Issar P, Philip P. Healthcare associated COVID-19 infections – further action. 2020. Available from: https://www.england.nhs.uk/coronavirus/wp-content/uploads/sites/52/2020/06/Healthcare-associated-COVID-19-infections--further-action-24-June-2020.pdf
Statistics » Bed Availability and Occupancy. Available from: https://www.england.nhs.uk/statistics/statistical-work-areas/bed-availability-and-occupancy/ . Cited 2022 Dec 21.
NHSE/I updates guidance on inpatient visiting, allowing it only “in a very careful and COVID-secure way”. COVID-19 policy tracker. Available from: https://covid19.health.org.uk/theme/nhsei-updates-guidance-inpatient-visiting-allowing-it-only-very-careful-and-covid-secure-way . Cited 2023 Jul 3.
Temime L, Gustin M-P, Duval A, Buetti N, Crépey P, Guillemot D, et al. A Conceptual Discussion About the Basic Reproduction Number of Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 in Healthcare Settings. Clin Infect Dis. 2021;72(1):141–3.
pubmed: 32473007
Face masks and coverings to be worn by all NHS hospital staff and visitors. GOV.UK. Available from: https://www.gov.uk/government/news/face-masks-and-coverings-to-be-worn-by-all-nhs-hospital-staff-and-visitors . Cited 2023 Jul 3.
Hoernke K, Djellouli N, Andrews L, Lewis-Jackson S, Manby L, Martin S, et al. Frontline healthcare workers’ experiences with personal protective equipment during the COVID-19 pandemic in the UK: a rapid qualitative appraisal. BMJ Open. 2021;11(1): e046199.
doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-046199
pubmed: 33472794
Alden K, Read M, Timmis J, Andrews PS, Veiga-Fernandes H, Coles M. Spartan: A Comprehensive Tool for Understanding Uncertainty in Simulations of Biological Systems. PLoS Comput Biol. 2013;9(2): e1002916.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1002916
pubmed: 23468606
pmcid: 3585389
Jafari Y, Yin M, Lim C, Pople D, Evans S, Stimson J, et al. Effectiveness of infection prevention and control interventions, excluding personal protective equipment, to prevent nosocomial transmission of SARS-CoV-2: a systematic review and call for action. Infect Prev Pract. 2022;4(1): 100192.
doi: 10.1016/j.infpip.2021.100192
pubmed: 34870142
Patterson B, Mehra R, Breathnach A. Unmasking the mask: A time-series analysis of nosocomial COVID-19 rates before and after removal. In Copenhagen: ECCMID; 2023. (conference abstract).
Noh JY, Song JY, Yoon JG, Seong H, Cheong HJ, Kim WJ. Safe hospital preparedness in the era of COVID-19: The Swiss cheese model. Int J Infect Dis. 2020;98:294–6.
doi: 10.1016/j.ijid.2020.06.094
pubmed: 32619759
pmcid: 7326408
Yanke E, Carayon P, Safdar N. Translating evidence into practice using a systems engineering framework for infection prevention. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2014;35(9):1176–82.
doi: 10.1086/677638
pubmed: 25111927
Ferris M, Ferris R, Workman C, O’Connor E, Enoch DA, Goldesgeyme E, et al. Efficacy of FFP3 respirators for prevention of SARS-CoV-2 infection in healthcare workers. Elife. 2021;16:10.
Hugelius K, Harada N, Marutani M. Consequences of visiting restrictions during the COVID-19 pandemic: An integrative review. Int J Nurs Stud. 2021;121: 104000.
doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2021.104000
pubmed: 34242976
pmcid: 8196532
Mheidly N, Fares MY, Zalzale H, Fares J. Effect of Face Masks on Interpersonal Communication During the COVID-19 Pandemic. Front Public Health. 2020 Dec. Available from: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/ https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2020.582191/full . Cited 2023 Jan 10;8.
Nicholls I, Saada L. Communication, Confusion, and COVID-19: the challenges of wearing PPE on a geriatrics ward during the COVID-19 pandemic. Re: Patient perspective: Gordon Sturmey and Matt Wiltshire,. BMJ. 2023 Jan 10; Available from: https://www.bmj.com/content/369/bmj.m1814/rr . Cited 2023 Jan 10.
Bloemberg D, Musters SCW, van der Wal-Huisman H, van Dieren S, Nieveen van Dijkum EJM, Eskes AM. Impact of family visit restrictions due to COVID19 policy on patient outcomes A cohort study. J Adv Nurs. 2022;78(12):4042–53.
doi: 10.1111/jan.15325
pubmed: 35699245
Aengst J, Walker-Stevenson G, Harrod T, Ivankovic J, Neilson J, Guise J-M. Uncomfortable yet necessary: The impact of PPE on communication in emergency medicine. Int J Qual Health Care. 2022 Dec 28;34(4). Available from: https://academic.oup.com/intqhc/article/34/4/mzac095/6854825 . Cited 2023 Jan 10.
Muzzi E, Chermaz C, Castro V, Zaninoni M, Saksida A, Orzan E. Short report on the effects of SARS-CoV-2 face protective equipment on verbal communication. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2021;278(9):3565–70.
doi: 10.1007/s00405-020-06535-1
pubmed: 33389012
pmcid: 7778571
Hampton T, Crunkhorn R, Lowe N, Bhat J, Hogg E, Afifi W, De S, Street I, Sharma R, Krishnan M, Clarke R, Dasgupta S, Ratnayake S, Sharma S. The negative impact of wearing personal protective equipment on communication during coronavirus disease 2019. J Laryngol Otol. 2020;134(7):577–81. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022215120001437 .
Swaminathan R, Mukundadura BP, Prasad S. Impact of enhanced personal protective equipment on the physical and mental well-being of healthcare workers during COVID-19. Postgrad Med J. 2022;98(1157):231–3.
doi: 10.1136/postgradmedj-2020-139150
pubmed: 33273107
Aloweni F, Bouchoucha SL, Hutchinson A, Ang SY, Toh HX, Suhari NAB, et al. Health care workers’ experience of personal protective equipment use and associated adverse effects during the COVID-19 pandemic response in Singapore. J Adv Nurs. 2022;78(8):2383–96.
doi: 10.1111/jan.15164
pubmed: 35170075
pmcid: 9111733
Ayton D, Soh S-E, Berkovic D, Parker C, Yu K, Honeyman D, et al. Experiences of personal protective equipment by Australian healthcare workers during the COVID-19 pandemic, 2020: A cross-sectional study. PLoS ONE. 2022;17(6): e0269484.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0269484
pubmed: 35671287
pmcid: 9173633
Galanis P, Vraka I, Fragkou D, Bilali A, Kaitelidou D. Impact of personal protective equipment use on health care workers’ physical health during the COVID-19 pandemic: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Am J Infect Control. 2021;49(10):1305–15.
doi: 10.1016/j.ajic.2021.04.084
pubmed: 33965463
pmcid: 8102386