Morphology of the dysplastic hip and the relationship with sex and acetabular version.
hip
hip dysplasia
morphology
sex
three‐dimensional model
Journal
Clinical anatomy (New York, N.Y.)
ISSN: 1098-2353
Titre abrégé: Clin Anat
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 8809128
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
08 May 2024
08 May 2024
Historique:
received:
15
03
2024
accepted:
16
04
2024
medline:
8
5
2024
pubmed:
8
5
2024
entrez:
8
5
2024
Statut:
aheadofprint
Résumé
The dysplastic hip is characterized by incomplete coverage of the femoral head, resulting in increased risk of early osteoarthritis. The morphological variation of the hip joint is diverse and clear differences exist between females and males. The aim of this observational study was therefore to investigate the relationship between the morphology of the hip, sex, and hip dysplasia using a three-dimensional model. Statistical shape models of the combined femur and pelvic bones were created from bilateral hips of 75 patients. Using manual angle measurements and regression analysis, the characteristic shape differences associated with sex and hip dysplasia were determined. The model showed clear differences associated with sex and hip dysplasia. We found that the acetabular anteversion in females was significantly higher (p < 0.0001) than in males while no significant difference in acetabular anteversion was found between normal and dysplastic hips (p = 0.11). The model showed that decreased acetabular anteversion resulted in the appearance of the cross-over sign and the prominent ischial spine sign commonly associated with retroversion. Sex could be predicted with an area under the curve of 0.99 and hip dysplasia could be predicted with an area under the curve of ≥0.73. Our findings suggest that retroversion is a result of decreased anteversion of the acetabulum and is primarily associated with sex. This finding should be taken into account during the reorientation of the acetabulum in the surgical treatment of hip dysplasia.
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Subventions
Organisme : Netherlands Organization for Scientific Research
Organisme : Aarhus Universitet
Informations de copyright
© 2024 The Authors. Clinical Anatomy published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of American Association of Clinical Anatomists and British Association of Clinical Anatomists.
Références
Ackerman, I. N., Bohensky, M. A., Zomer, E., Tacey, M., Gorelik, A., Brand, C. A., & de Steiger, R. (2019). The projected burden of primary total knee and hip replacement for osteoarthritis in Australia to the year 2030. BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, 20, 90.
Ackerman, I. N., Busija, L., Lorimer, M., de Steiger, R., & Graves, S. E. (2021). Lifetime risk of revision hip replacement surgery in Australia remains low: A population‐level analysis using national registry data. The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery. American Volume, 103, 389–396.
Agricola, R., Reijman, M., Bierma‐Zeinstra, S. M., Verhaar, J. A., Weinans, H., & Waarsing, J. H. (2013). Total hip replacement but not clinical osteoarthritis can be predicted by the shape of the hip: A prospective cohort study (CHECK). Osteoarthritis and Cartilage, 21, 559–564.
Barr, R. J., Gregory, J. S., Reid, D. M., Aspden, R. M., Yoshida, K., Hosie, G., Silman, A. J., Alesci, S., & Macfarlane, G. J. (2012). Predicting OA progression to total hip replacement: Can we do better than risk factors alone using active shape modelling as an imaging biomarker? Rheumatology (Oxford), 51, 562–570.
Bræmer, C. N., Langberg, S. A., Jakobsen, S. S., Jakobsen, S. R., Aleixo, H., Søballe, K., & Mechlenburg, I. (2020). Does pain and hip function improve 2 years after reverse periacetabular osteotomy? A follow‐up study of 74 patients. Journal of Hip Preservation Surgery, 7, 130–139.
Chan, E. F., Farnsworth, C. L., Koziol, J. A., Hosalkar, H. S., & Sah, R. L. (2013). Statistical shape modeling of proximal femoral shape deformities in Legg‐Calvé‐Perthes disease and slipped capital femoral epiphysis. Osteoarthritis and Cartilage, 21, 443–449.
Decker, S. J., Davy‐Jow, S. L., Ford, J. M., & Hilbelink, D. R. (2011). Virtual determination of sex: Metric and nonmetric traits of the adult pelvis from 3D computed tomography models. Journal of Forensic Sciences, 56, 1107–1114.
Dembic, M., van Brakel Andersen, L., Larsen, M. J., Mechlenburg, I., Søballe, K., & Hertz, J. M. (2023). Whole exome sequencing of 28 families of Danish descent reveals novel candidate genes and pathways in developmental dysplasia of the hip. Molecular Genetics and Genomics, 298, 329–342.
El Jashi, R., Gustafson, M. B., Jakobsen, M. B., Lautrup, C., Hertz, J. M., Søballe, K., & Mechlenburg, I. (2017). The association between gender and familial prevalence of hip dysplasia in Danish patients. Hip International, 27, 299–304.
Fujii, M., Nakashima, Y., Sato, T., Akiyama, M., & Iwamoto, Y. (2011). Pelvic deformity influences acetabular version and coverage in hip dysplasia. Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research, 469, 1735–1742.
Ganz, R., Parvizi, J., Beck, M., Leunig, M., Nötzli, H., & Siebenrock, K. A. (2003). Femoroacetabular impingement: A cause for osteoarthritis of the hip. Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research, 417, 112–120.
Gower, J. C. (1975). Generalized Procrustes Analysis. Psychometrika, 40, 33–51.
Harris, M. D., Datar, M., Whitaker, R. T., Jurrus, E. R., Peters, C. L., & Anderson, A. E. (2013). Statistical shape modeling of cam femoroacetabular impingement. Journal of Orthopaedic Research, 31, 1620–1626.
Hetsroni, I., Dela Torre, K., Duke, G., Lyman, S., & Kelly, B. T. (2013). Sex differences of hip morphology in young adults with hip pain and labral tears. Arthroscopy, 29, 54–63.
Ito, K., Minka, M. A., 2nd, Leunig, M., Werlen, S., & Ganz, R. (2001). Femoroacetabular impingement and the cam‐effect. A MRI‐based quantitative anatomical study of the femoral head‐neck offset. Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery. British Volume (London), 83, 171–176.
Jamali, A. A., Mladenov, K., Meyer, D. C., Martinez, A., Beck, M., Ganz, R., & Leunig, M. (2007). Anteroposterior pelvic radiographs to assess acetabular retroversion: High validity of the “cross‐over‐sign”. Journal of Orthopaedic Research, 25, 758–765.
Kalberer, F., Sierra, R. J., Madan, S. S., Ganz, R., & Leunig, M. (2008). Ischial spine projection into the pelvis: A new sign for acetabular retroversion. Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research, 466, 677–683.
Larson, C. M., Moreau‐Gaudry, A., Kelly, B. T., Byrd, J. W., Tonetti, J., Lavallee, S., Chabanas, L., Barrier, G., & Bedi, A. (2015). Are normal hips being labeled as pathologic? A CT‐based method for defining normal acetabular coverage. Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research, 473, 1247–1254.
Lodhia, P., Chandrasekaran, S., Gui, C., Darwish, N., Suarez‐Ahedo, C., & Domb, B. G. (2016). Open and arthroscopic treatment of adult hip dysplasia: A systematic review. Arthroscopy, 32, 374–383.
Lorensen, W. E., & Cline, H. E. (1987). Marching cubes: A high resolution 3D surface construction algorithm. ACM SIGGRAPH Computer Graphics, 21, 163–169.
Mast, J. W., Brunner, R. L., & Zebrack, J. (2004). Recognizing acetabular version in the radiographic presentation of hip dysplasia. Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research, 418, 48–53.
Mechlenburg, I., Nyengaard, J. R., Rømer, L., & Søballe, K. (2004). Changes in load‐bearing area after Ganz periacetabular osteotomy evaluated by multislice CT scanning and stereology. Acta Orthopaedica Scandinavica, 75, 147–153.
Mechlenburg, I., Stilling, M., Rømer, L., de Bruijne, M., Søballe, K., & de Raedt, S. (2019). Reference values and variation of acetabular angles measured by computed tomography in 170 asymptomatic hips. Acta Radiologica, 60, 895–901.
Metz, C. T., Klein, C., Schaap, M., Van Walsum, T., & Niessen, W. J. (2011). Nonrigid registration of dynamic medical imaging data using nD + t B‐splines and a groupwise optimization approach. Medical Image Analysis, 15, 238–249.
O'Brien, M. J., Semciw, A. I., Mechlenburg, I., Tønning, L. C., Stewart, C. J., & Kemp, J. L. (2023). Pain, function and quality of life are impaired in adults undergoing periacetabular osteotomy (PAO) for hip dysplasia: A systematic review and meta‐analysis. Hip International, 34, 96–114.
Raedt, S. D., Mechlenburg, I., Stilling, M., Rømer, L., Søballe, K., & de Bruijne, M. (2013). Automated measurement of diagnostic angles for hip dysplasia. In Proceedings of SPIE—The International Society for Optical Engineering. 8670.09. https://doi.org/10.1117/12.2007599
Reynolds, D., Lucas, J., & Klaue, K. (1999). Retroversion of the acetabulum. A cause of hip pain. Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery. British Volume (London), 81, 281–288.
Sarkalkan, N., Weinans, H., & Zadpoor, A. A. (2014). Statistical shape and appearance models of bones. Bone, 60, 129–140.
Steppacher, S. D., Lerch, T. D., Gharanizadeh, K., Liechti, E. F., Werlen, S. F., Puls, M., Tannast, M., & Siebenrock, K. A. (2014). Size and shape of the lunate surface in different types of pincer impingement: Theoretical implications for surgical therapy. Osteoarthritis and Cartilage, 22, 951–958.
Tallroth, K., & Lepistö, J. (2006). Computed tomography measurement of acetabular dimensions: Normal values for correction of dysplasia. Acta Orthopaedica, 77, 598–602.
Tannast, M., Pfannebecker, P., Schwab, J. M., Albers, C. E., Siebenrock, K. A., & Büchler, L. (2012). Pelvic morphology differs in rotation and obliquity between developmental dysplasia of the hip and retroversion. Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research, 470, 3297–3305.
Wyles, C. C., Heidenreich, M. J., Jeng, J., Larson, D. R., Trousdale, R. T., & Sierra, R. J. (2017). The John Charnley award: Redefining the natural history of osteoarthritis in patients with hip dysplasia and impingement. Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research, 475, 336–350.
Zheng, G., Gollmer, S., Schumann, S., Dong, X., Feilkas, T., & González Ballester, M. A. (2009). A 2D/3D correspondence building method for reconstruction of a patient‐specific 3D bone surface model using point distribution models and calibrated X‐ray images. Medical Image Analysis, 13, 883–899.