Cell-type specific inhibitory plasticity in subicular pyramidal cells.

GABAergic inhibition hippocampus pyramidal cells rat subiculum synaptic plasticity

Journal

Frontiers in cellular neuroscience
ISSN: 1662-5102
Titre abrégé: Front Cell Neurosci
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101477935

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
2024
Historique:
received: 10 01 2024
accepted: 29 03 2024
medline: 8 5 2024
pubmed: 8 5 2024
entrez: 8 5 2024
Statut: epublish

Résumé

The balance between excitation and inhibition is essential to the proper function of cortical circuits. To maintain this balance during dynamic network activity, modulation of the strength of inhibitory synapses is a central requirement. In this study, we aimed to characterize perisomatic inhibition and its plasticity onto pyramidal cells (PCs) in the subiculum, the main output region of the hippocampus. We performed whole-cell patch-clamp recordings from the two main functional PC types, burst (BS) and regular spiking (RS) neurons in acute rat hippocampal slices and applied two different extracellular high-frequency stimulation paradigms: non-associative (presynaptic stimulation only) and associative stimulation (concurrent pre-and postsynaptic stimulation) to induce plasticity. Our results revealed cell type-specific differences in the expression of inhibitory plasticity depending on the induction paradigm: While associative stimulation caused robust inhibitory plasticity in both cell types, non-associative stimulation produced long-term potentiation in RS, but not in BS PCs. Analysis of paired-pulse ratio, variance of IPSPs, and postsynaptic Ca2+ buffering indicated a dominant postsynaptic calcium-dependent signaling and expression of inhibitory plasticity in both PC types. This divergence in inhibitory plasticity complements a stronger inhibition and a higher intrinsic excitability in RS as compared to BS neurons, suggesting differential involvement of the two PC types during network activation and information processing in the subiculum.

Identifiants

pubmed: 38716238
doi: 10.3389/fncel.2024.1368627
pmc: PMC11074406
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

1368627

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2024 Guinet, Grosser, Özbay, Behr and Vida.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest. The author(s) declared that they were an editorial board member of Frontiers, at the time of submission. This had no impact on the peer review process and the final decision.

Auteurs

Alix Guinet (A)

Institute for Integrative Neuroanatomy, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Institute for Biology, Humboldt - Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Department of Psychiatry, Psychotherapy and Psychosomatic Medicine, Brandenburg Medical School, Neuruppin, Germany.

Sabine Grosser (S)

Institute for Integrative Neuroanatomy, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany.

Duru Özbay (D)

Institute for Integrative Neuroanatomy, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Department of Psychiatry, Psychotherapy and Psychosomatic Medicine, Brandenburg Medical School, Neuruppin, Germany.

Joachim Behr (J)

Department of Psychiatry, Psychotherapy and Psychosomatic Medicine, Brandenburg Medical School, Neuruppin, Germany.
Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Faculty of Health Science Brandenburg, Joint Faculty of the University of Potsdam, Brandenburg University of Technology Cottbus-Senftenberg and Brandenburg Medical School Theodor Fontane, Potsdam, Germany.

Imre Vida (I)

Institute for Integrative Neuroanatomy, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany.

Classifications MeSH