Integrated histological parameters define prognostically relevant groups in atypical endometrial hyperplasia/endometrioid intraepithelial neoplasia.

Endometrial Hyperplasia Pathology Uterine Cancer

Journal

International journal of gynecological cancer : official journal of the International Gynecological Cancer Society
ISSN: 1525-1438
Titre abrégé: Int J Gynecol Cancer
Pays: England
ID NLM: 9111626

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
06 May 2024
Historique:
medline: 9 5 2024
pubmed: 9 5 2024
entrez: 8 5 2024
Statut: aheadofprint

Résumé

To assess the risk of endometrial carcinoma following a diagnosis of atypical hyperplasia/endometrioid intraepithelial neoplasia by endometrial biopsy, stratified based on integrated histological parameters. All women with atypical hyperplasia/endometrioid intraepithelial neoplasia undergoing hysterectomy within 1 year of diagnosis without progestin treatment were included. Patients were subdivided into three study groups, based on two criteria: (a) grade of nuclear atypia and (b) foci (<2 mm) of confluent glands with no intervening stroma: low-grade, high-grade, and confluent glands. The rate of endometrial carcinoma on the subsequent hysterectomy was assessed in each study group, and differences between study groups were assessed using Fisher's exact test, with a significant p value <0.05. Reproducibility was assessed by using Cohen's κ. Ninety-six patients were included. Overall, 36 of 96 patients (37.5%) had endometrial carcinoma on the subsequent hysterectomy. The number of endometrial carcinomas was 4 of 42 (9.5%) in the low-grade group, 14 of 28 (50.0%) in the high-grade group, and 18 of 26 (69.2%) in the confluent glands group. The rate of endometrial carcinoma was significantly higher in the high-grade group than in the low-grade group (p<0.001), whereas it did not significantly differ between the high-grade group and the confluent glands group (p=0.176). The reproducibility among pathologists was moderate for low-grade versus high-grade (κ=0.58) and substantial for confluent glands versus low-grade (κ=0.63) and high-grade (κ=0.63). Atypical hyperplasia/endometrioid intraepithelial neoplasia can be stratified into prognostically relevant groups based on integrated histological parameters, with a possible major impact on patient management.

Identifiants

pubmed: 38719279
pii: ijgc-2024-005367
doi: 10.1136/ijgc-2024-005367
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Informations de copyright

© IGCS and ESGO 2024. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

Competing interests: None declared.

Auteurs

Antonio Raffone (A)

Department of Neurosciences and Reproductive and Odontostomatological Sciences, University Federico II of Naples, Naples, Italy.
Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy.

Luigi Insabato (L)

Department of Advanced Biomedical Sciences, Federico II University of Naples, Naples, Campania, Italy.

Diego Raimondo (D)

Division of Gynaecology and Human Reproduction Physiopathology, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna Policlinico S Orsola, Bologna, Emilia-Romagna, Italy.

Irene Del Piano (I)

Department of Advanced Biomedical Sciences, Federico II University of Naples, Naples, Campania, Italy.

Marialuisa Ricciardiello (M)

Department of Advanced Biomedical Sciences, Federico II University of Naples, Naples, Campania, Italy.
Department of Translational Medical Sciences, University of Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli", Naples, Italy.

Pasquale Cretella (P)

Department of Advanced Biomedical Sciences, Federico II University of Naples, Naples, Campania, Italy.

Daniele Neola (D)

Department of Neurosciences and Reproductive and Odontostomatological Sciences, University Federico II of Naples, Naples, Italy.

Damiano Arciuolo (D)

Department of Woman and Child's Health and Public Health Sciences, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Roma, Italy.
Department of Life Sciences and Public Health, Catholic University of the Sacred Heart, Roma, Italy.

Angela Santoro (A)

Department of Woman and Child's Health and Public Health Sciences, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Roma, Italy.
Department of Life Sciences and Public Health, Catholic University of the Sacred Heart, Roma, Italy.

Renato Seracchioli (R)

Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy.
Division of Gynaecology and Human Reproduction Physiopathology, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna Policlinico S Orsola, Bologna, Emilia-Romagna, Italy.

Maurizio Guida (M)

Department of Neurosciences and Reproductive and Odontostomatological Sciences, University Federico II of Naples, Naples, Italy.

Antonio Travaglino (A)

Department of Advanced Biomedical Sciences, Federico II University of Naples, Naples, Campania, Italy antonio.travaglino@uninsubria.it.
Department of Medicine and Technological Innovation, University of Insubria, Varese, Italy.

Gian Franco Zannoni (GF)

Department of Woman and Child's Health and Public Health Sciences, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Roma, Italy.
Department of Life Sciences and Public Health, Catholic University of the Sacred Heart, Roma, Italy.

Classifications MeSH