Safety and feasibility of chemotherapy followed by liver transplantation for patients with definitely unresectable colorectal liver metastases: insights from the TransMet randomised clinical trial.

Chemotherapy Colorectal liver metastases Liver transplantation Randomised clinical trial

Journal

EClinicalMedicine
ISSN: 2589-5370
Titre abrégé: EClinicalMedicine
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101733727

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Jun 2024
Historique:
received: 03 12 2023
revised: 17 03 2024
accepted: 05 04 2024
medline: 9 5 2024
pubmed: 9 5 2024
entrez: 9 5 2024
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Despite the increasing efficacy of chemotherapy (C), the 5-year survival rate for patients with unresectable colorectal liver metastases (CLM) remains around 10%. Liver transplantation (LT) might offer a curative approach for patients with liver-only disease, yet its superior efficacy compared to C alone remains to be demonstrated. The TransMet randomised multicentre clinical trial (NCT02597348) compares the curative potential of C followed by LT versus C alone in patients with unresectable CLM despite stable or responding disease on C. Patient eligibility criteria proposed by local tumour boards had to be validated by an independent committee via monthly videoconferences. Outcomes reported here are from a non-specified interim analysis. These include the eligibility of patients to be transplanted for non resectable colorectal liver metastases, as well as the feasibility and the safety of liver transplantation in this indication. From February 2016 to July 2021, 94 (60%) of 157 patients from 20 centres in 3 countries submitted to the validation committee, were randomised. Reasons for ineligibility were mainly tumour progression in 50 (32%) or potential resectability in 13 (8%). The median delay to LT after randomisation was 51 (IQR 30-65) days. Nine of 47 patients (19%, 95% CI: 9-33) allocated to the LT arm failed to undergo transplantation because of intercurrent disease progression. Three of the 38 transplanted patients (8%) were re-transplanted, one of whom (3%) died post-operatively from multi-organ failure. The selection process of potential candidates for curative intent LT for unresectable CLM in the TransMet trial highlighted the critical role of an independent multidisciplinary validation committee. After stringent selection, the feasibility of LT was 81%, as 19% had disease progression while on the waiting list. These patients should be given high priority for organ allocation to avoid dropout from the transplant strategy. No source of support or funding from any author to disclose for this work. The trial was supported by the Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP).

Sections du résumé

Background UNASSIGNED
Despite the increasing efficacy of chemotherapy (C), the 5-year survival rate for patients with unresectable colorectal liver metastases (CLM) remains around 10%. Liver transplantation (LT) might offer a curative approach for patients with liver-only disease, yet its superior efficacy compared to C alone remains to be demonstrated.
Methods UNASSIGNED
The TransMet randomised multicentre clinical trial (NCT02597348) compares the curative potential of C followed by LT versus C alone in patients with unresectable CLM despite stable or responding disease on C. Patient eligibility criteria proposed by local tumour boards had to be validated by an independent committee via monthly videoconferences. Outcomes reported here are from a non-specified interim analysis. These include the eligibility of patients to be transplanted for non resectable colorectal liver metastases, as well as the feasibility and the safety of liver transplantation in this indication.
Findings UNASSIGNED
From February 2016 to July 2021, 94 (60%) of 157 patients from 20 centres in 3 countries submitted to the validation committee, were randomised. Reasons for ineligibility were mainly tumour progression in 50 (32%) or potential resectability in 13 (8%). The median delay to LT after randomisation was 51 (IQR 30-65) days. Nine of 47 patients (19%, 95% CI: 9-33) allocated to the LT arm failed to undergo transplantation because of intercurrent disease progression. Three of the 38 transplanted patients (8%) were re-transplanted, one of whom (3%) died post-operatively from multi-organ failure.
Interpretation UNASSIGNED
The selection process of potential candidates for curative intent LT for unresectable CLM in the TransMet trial highlighted the critical role of an independent multidisciplinary validation committee. After stringent selection, the feasibility of LT was 81%, as 19% had disease progression while on the waiting list. These patients should be given high priority for organ allocation to avoid dropout from the transplant strategy.
Funding UNASSIGNED
No source of support or funding from any author to disclose for this work. The trial was supported by the Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP).

Identifiants

pubmed: 38721015
doi: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2024.102608
pii: S2589-5370(24)00187-1
pmc: PMC11077272
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

102608

Informations de copyright

© 2024 The Authors.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

No sources of support or funding for this study to disclose. There are no ethical problems or conflicts of interest related to the study reported in this paper. ICMJE conflict of interest forms are provided for each author.

Auteurs

René Adam (R)

AP-HP Hôpital Paul Brousse, Université Paris-Saclay, Villejuif, France.

David Badrudin (D)

AP-HP Hôpital Paul Brousse, Université Paris-Saclay, Villejuif, France.
Université De Montréal, Département de Chirurgie, Montréal, Canada.

Laurence Chiche (L)

CHU Bordeaux, Bordeaux, France.

Petru Bucur (P)

CHU Tours, Tours, France.

Olivier Scatton (O)

AP-HP, Paris, France.

Victoire Granger (V)

CHU Grenoble, Grenoble, France.

Michel Ducreux (M)

Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France.

Umberto Cillo (U)

University of Padova, Padova, Italy.

François Cauchy (F)

AP-HP, Paris, France.

Mickael Lesurtel (M)

Department of Digestive Surgery & Liver Transplantation, Croix Rousse University Hospital, Hospices Civils de Lyon, University of Lyon, Lyon, France.

Jean-Yves Mabrut (JY)

Department of Digestive Surgery & Liver Transplantation, Croix Rousse University Hospital, Hospices Civils de Lyon, University of Lyon, Lyon, France.

Chris Verslype (C)

Uz Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.

Laurent Coubeau (L)

Uc Louvain, Louvain, Belgium.

Jean Hardwigsen (J)

AP-HM, Marseille, France.

Emmanuel Boleslawski (E)

CHRU Lille, Lille, France.

Fabrice Muscari (F)

CHU Toulouse, Toulouse, France.

Heithem Jeddou (H)

CHU Rennes, Rennes, France.

Denis Pezet (D)

CHU Clermont-Ferrand, Clermont-Ferrand, France.

Bruno Heyd (B)

CHU Besançon, Besançon, France.

Valerio Lucidi (V)

Hôpital Erasme, Bruxelles, Belgium.

Karen Geboes (K)

Uz Gent, Gent, Belgium.

Jan Lerut (J)

Uc Louvain, Louvain, Belgium.

Pietro Majno (P)

Università Della Svizzera Italiana, Lugano, Switzerland.

Lamiae Grimaldi (L)

AP-HP, Paris, France.

Nadjia Boukhedouni (N)

AP-HP, Paris, France.

Céline Piedvache (C)

AP-HP, Paris, France.

Maximiliano Gelli (M)

Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France.

Francis Levi (F)

AP-HP Hôpital Paul Brousse, Université Paris-Saclay, Villejuif, France.

Maïté Lewin (M)

AP-HP Hôpital Paul Brousse, Université Paris-Saclay, Villejuif, France.

Classifications MeSH