Prelaminated Nose Reconstruction: Comparison of Forehead and Radial Donor Site and Review of the Literature.
Journal
The Journal of craniofacial surgery
ISSN: 1536-3732
Titre abrégé: J Craniofac Surg
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 9010410
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
09 May 2024
09 May 2024
Historique:
received:
20
02
2024
accepted:
08
03
2024
medline:
9
5
2024
pubmed:
9
5
2024
entrez:
9
5
2024
Statut:
aheadofprint
Résumé
Total nose reconstruction is demanding as it is a 3-dimensional structure that needs lining, support and external coverage. Usually, several stages are needed to achieve a satisfactory result. The authors present 2 cases of prelaminated radial forearm and 2 prelaminated forehead nose reconstructions and compare both methods. According to our review of the literature, this is the first report of prelaminated forehead for total nose reconstruction. The last 5 years the authors have treated 4 patients with prelaminated flaps for total nose reconstruction. The age ranged from 50 to 75 years. There were 3 male patients and one female. Three patients underwent total nose amputation due to squamous cell carcinoma and one due to melanoma. Two patients were treated with prelaminated radial forearm reconstruction and 2 with prelaminated forehead reconstruction. Both patients that were treated with prelaminated radial forearm reconstruction had the collapse of the nasal pyramid and had salvage procedures with replacement of the cartilaginous framework with iliac bone graft framework. Prelaminated nose reconstruction with either the radial forearm or forehead flap needs several stages. There is the possibility of infection-collapse of the cartilage framework, therefore, the authors recommend reconstruction of the nasal skeleton with an iliac bone graft. The flaps are stiff and difficult to handle. The authors don't think that prelaminated nose reconstruction with the radial forearm flap has advantage compared with the classic several stages nose reconstruction with radial forearm flap. Possibly, prelaminated forehead reconstruction can be applied for aged patients who cannot undergo microsurgical reconstruction.
Identifiants
pubmed: 38722371
doi: 10.1097/SCS.0000000000010253
pii: 00001665-990000000-01540
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2024 by Mutaz B. Habal, MD.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The authors report no conflicts of interest.
Références
Susruta. Sushruta Samhita based on original Sanskrit text. (English translation edited and published by Kaviraj Kunja Lal Bhishagratna) Bose, Calcutta: 1907-1916
McDowell F, Valone JA, Brown JB. Bibliography and historical note on plastic surgery of the nose. Plast Reconstr Surg 1952;10:149
Tagliocozzi G. De Curtorum Chirurgia per Insitionem. Gaspar Bindonus Jr, 1597
Burget GC, Menick FJ. Nasal support and lining. The marriage of beauty and blood supply. Plast Reconstr Surg 1984;84:189–203
Millard DR Jr. Reconstructive rhinoplasty for the lower two-thirds of the nose. Plast Reconstr Surg 1976;57:722–728
Barton FE Jr. Aesthetic aspects of partial nasal reconstruction. Clin Plast Surg 1981;8:177
Shaw WW. Microvascular reconstruction of the nose. Clin Plast Surg 1981;8:471–480
Shenaq SM, Dinh TA, Spira M. Nasal alar reconstruction with an ear helix free flap. J Reconstr Microsurg 1989;5:63–67
Song R, Gao Y, Song Y, et al. The forearm flap. Clin Plast Surg 1982;9:21–26
Pribaz JJ, Fine NA. Prelamination: defining the prefabricated flap-a case report and review. Microsurgery 1994;15:618–623
Costa H, Cunha C, Guimaraes I, et al. Prefabricated flaps for the head and neck. A preliminary report. Br J Plast Surg 1993;46:223–227
Walton RL, Burget GC, Beahm EK. Microsurgical reconstruction of the nasal lining. Plast Reconstr Surg 2005;115:1813–1829
Salibian AH, Menick FJ, Talley J. Microvascular Reconstruction of the Nose with the Radial Forearm Flap: A 17-Year Experience in 47 Patients. Plast Reconstr Surg 2019;144:199–210
Gasteratos K, Spyropoulou GA, Chaiyasate K, et al. Microsurgical techniques and postoperative outcomes after total and subtotal nasal reconstruction: a systematic review. Ann Plast Surg 2022;88:679–686
Pribaz JJ, Weiss D. Free flap reconstruction of the nose. Operative Tech Plastic Reconstr Surg 1999;6:240–249
Sinha M, Scott JR, Watson SB. Prelaminated free radial forearm flap for a total nasal reconstruction. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2008;61:953–957
Cavadas PC, Torres A. Total nasal reconstruction with prefabricated and prelaminated free flap. Ann Plast Surg 2019;83:e35–e38
Horta R, Monteiro D, Órfão T, et al. Functional facial reconstruction in a patient with severe burn sequelae with a prelaminated parascapular free flap based on a three-dimensional model: a case report. Microsurgery 2020;40:802–807
Bali ZU, Karatan B, Parspanci A, et al. Total nasal reconstruction with pre-laminated, super-thin anterolateral thigh flap: a case report. Microsurgery 2021;41:569–573
Aldana CA, Ramirez PD, Sandoval JH, et al. Prelaminated temporoparietal osteofascial flap: a novel nasal reconstruction technique. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open 2021;9:e3977
Fujiwara M, Suzuki A, Mizukami T, et al. Prefabricated scalping forehead flap with skeletal support. J Craniofac Surg 2009;20:1182–1185
Prasanna NS. Nasal reconstruction with pre-laminated forehead flap. Indian J Plast Surg 2017;50:306–309
Cerci FB. Usefulness of the subunit principle in nasal reconstruction. An Bras Dermatol 2017;92:159–162