Update on chelating agents in endodontic treatment: A systematic review.


Journal

Journal of clinical and experimental dentistry
ISSN: 1989-5488
Titre abrégé: J Clin Exp Dent
Pays: Spain
ID NLM: 101603132

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Apr 2024
Historique:
received: 28 08 2023
accepted: 12 02 2024
medline: 10 5 2024
pubmed: 10 5 2024
entrez: 10 5 2024
Statut: epublish

Résumé

The aim of this review was to assess the evidence regarding the most commonly used chelating agents in terms of efficacy, erosive potential, cytotoxicity, interaction, antimicrobial effect, impact on sealers adhesion, and release of growth factors. MEDLINE (PubMed) database, Cochrane Library and Scopus were searched up to January 14, 2023, including studies with one or more of the following chelating agents: 17% EDTA, 9% and 18% HEDP, 10% and 20% citric acid, 2%-2.25% peracetic acid and 7% maleic acid. In addition, the reference lists of all selected articles were also checked to identify additional relevant studies. Articles published in English and available in full-text were selected. The quality of studies was assessed using the modified CONSORT checklist guide and the Cochrane Collaboration tool. The electronic search yielded 538 citations, 56 of which were included. The articles included had moderate and low evidence values. Among 56 articles included, 55 were in vitro studies and one was a randomized clinical trial. Among the in vitro studies, 15 evaluated efficacy and dentin erosion, 12 evaluated interaction with other endodontic irrigants, 9 tested antimicrobial effect, 4 evaluated cytotoxicity in hamster and rat lung cells, 9 evaluated intervention in adhesion of filling materials and 8 focused on release of growth factors and on behavior of stem cells in regenerative endodontic. The RCT tested antimicrobial effect. 17% EDTA is the most effective in smear layer removal and in releasing growth factors on regenerative endodontics. However, the current incorporation of 9% and 18% etidronic acid has shown optimal results due to its compatibility with sodium hypochlorite and its capability on avoiding smear layer formation through a continuous chelation action. Despite these preliminary findings, methodological standardization between studies is required and in vivo studies are necessary to confirm in vitro studies.

Sections du résumé

Background UNASSIGNED
The aim of this review was to assess the evidence regarding the most commonly used chelating agents in terms of efficacy, erosive potential, cytotoxicity, interaction, antimicrobial effect, impact on sealers adhesion, and release of growth factors.
Material and Methods UNASSIGNED
MEDLINE (PubMed) database, Cochrane Library and Scopus were searched up to January 14, 2023, including studies with one or more of the following chelating agents: 17% EDTA, 9% and 18% HEDP, 10% and 20% citric acid, 2%-2.25% peracetic acid and 7% maleic acid. In addition, the reference lists of all selected articles were also checked to identify additional relevant studies. Articles published in English and available in full-text were selected. The quality of studies was assessed using the modified CONSORT checklist guide and the Cochrane Collaboration tool.
Results UNASSIGNED
The electronic search yielded 538 citations, 56 of which were included. The articles included had moderate and low evidence values. Among 56 articles included, 55 were in vitro studies and one was a randomized clinical trial. Among the in vitro studies, 15 evaluated efficacy and dentin erosion, 12 evaluated interaction with other endodontic irrigants, 9 tested antimicrobial effect, 4 evaluated cytotoxicity in hamster and rat lung cells, 9 evaluated intervention in adhesion of filling materials and 8 focused on release of growth factors and on behavior of stem cells in regenerative endodontic. The RCT tested antimicrobial effect.
Conclusions UNASSIGNED
17% EDTA is the most effective in smear layer removal and in releasing growth factors on regenerative endodontics. However, the current incorporation of 9% and 18% etidronic acid has shown optimal results due to its compatibility with sodium hypochlorite and its capability on avoiding smear layer formation through a continuous chelation action. Despite these preliminary findings, methodological standardization between studies is required and in vivo studies are necessary to confirm in vitro studies.

Identifiants

pubmed: 38725809
doi: 10.4317/jced.60989
pii: 60989
pmc: PMC11078497
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article Review

Langues

eng

Pagination

e516-e538

Informations de copyright

Copyright: © 2024 Medicina Oral S.L.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

Conflicts of interest There are no conflicts of interest.

Auteurs

Laura Fortea (L)

Department of Dentistry, Universitat de Barcelona, L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, Spain.

Diana Sanz-Serrano (D)

Department of Dentistry, Universitat de Barcelona, L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, Spain.

Luciana-Batista Luz (LB)

Department of Dentistry, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, Brazil.

Giulia Bardini (G)

Department of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, University of Cagliari, Cagliari, Italy.

Montse Mercade (M)

Department of Dentistry, Universitat de Barcelona, L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, Spain.
Researcher at IDIBELL Institute, L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, Spain.

Classifications MeSH