Does the Subtalar or Tibiotalar Joint Need Fused in Primary Retrograde Tibiotalocalcaneal Nailing for Fragility Ankle Fractures?

fragility ankle fracture hindfoot nailing joint preparation retrograde nailing

Journal

Foot & ankle specialist
ISSN: 1938-7636
Titre abrégé: Foot Ankle Spec
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101473598

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
10 May 2024
Historique:
medline: 10 5 2024
pubmed: 10 5 2024
entrez: 10 5 2024
Statut: aheadofprint

Résumé

As an alternative to traditional open reduction internal fixation of ankle fragility fractures, primary retrograde tibiotalocalcaneal (TTC) nailing has been investigated as a treatment option. These results suggest that this treatment is an acceptable alternative treatment option for these injuries. There are still questions about the need for formal joint preparation at the subtalar or tibiotalar joint when performing primary TTC nailing for fragility fractures. In this study, we retrospectively evaluated 32 patients treated with primary retrograde TTC nail without subtalar or tibiotalar joint preparation for a mean of 2.4 years postoperatively. We specifically reviewed the charts for nail breakages at either joint, patients developing subtalar or tibiotalar joint pathology requiring additional treatment, including return to the operating room for formal joint preparation. Fracture union occurred in 100% of patients. There were 3 cases (10.0%) of hardware failure, and 2 of these cases were asymptomatic and did not require any treatment. One patient (3.3%) developed hardware failure with nail breakage at the subtalar joint. This patient developed progressive pain and symptoms requiring revision surgery with formal arthrodesis of the subtalar and tibiotalar joint. This study shows that retrograde hindfoot nailing without formal subtalar or tibiotalar joint preparation is an acceptable potential treatment option in ankle fragility fractures. Mid-term follow-up demonstrates favorable outcomes without the need for formal joint preparation in this high-risk population. Comparative studies with higher patient numbers and long-term follow-up are needed to confirm the results of this study.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
As an alternative to traditional open reduction internal fixation of ankle fragility fractures, primary retrograde tibiotalocalcaneal (TTC) nailing has been investigated as a treatment option. These results suggest that this treatment is an acceptable alternative treatment option for these injuries. There are still questions about the need for formal joint preparation at the subtalar or tibiotalar joint when performing primary TTC nailing for fragility fractures.
METHODS METHODS
In this study, we retrospectively evaluated 32 patients treated with primary retrograde TTC nail without subtalar or tibiotalar joint preparation for a mean of 2.4 years postoperatively. We specifically reviewed the charts for nail breakages at either joint, patients developing subtalar or tibiotalar joint pathology requiring additional treatment, including return to the operating room for formal joint preparation.
RESULTS RESULTS
Fracture union occurred in 100% of patients. There were 3 cases (10.0%) of hardware failure, and 2 of these cases were asymptomatic and did not require any treatment. One patient (3.3%) developed hardware failure with nail breakage at the subtalar joint. This patient developed progressive pain and symptoms requiring revision surgery with formal arthrodesis of the subtalar and tibiotalar joint.
CONCLUSIONS CONCLUSIONS
This study shows that retrograde hindfoot nailing without formal subtalar or tibiotalar joint preparation is an acceptable potential treatment option in ankle fragility fractures. Mid-term follow-up demonstrates favorable outcomes without the need for formal joint preparation in this high-risk population. Comparative studies with higher patient numbers and long-term follow-up are needed to confirm the results of this study.

Identifiants

pubmed: 38726644
doi: 10.1177/19386400241249583
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

19386400241249583

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

Declaration of Conflicting InterestsThe author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Auteurs

Daniel T DeGenova (DT)

Department of Orthopedics, OhioHealth, Columbus, Ohio.

Zachary P Hill (ZP)

Department of Foot and Ankle Surgery, OhioHealth, Columbus, Ohio.

Adam D Hoffman (AD)

Department of Orthopedics, Mercy Health St. Elizabeth Youngstown Hospital, Youngstown, Ohio.

Avery R Taylor (AR)

Orthopedic and Reconstructive Surgery, OhioHealth Grant Medical Center, Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Columbus Ohio.

Boston Dues (B)

Orthopedic and Reconstructive Surgery, OhioHealth Grant Medical Center, Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Columbus Ohio.

Mallory Faherty (M)

Academic Research Services, OhioHealth Research Institute, Riverside Methodist Hospital, Columbus, Ohio.

Benjamin C Taylor (BC)

Orthopedic and Reconstructive Surgery, OhioHealth Grant Medical Center, Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Columbus Ohio.

Classifications MeSH