Comparing Postoperative Urinary Retention Rates Between Robotic Apical Prolapse Repairs.
Journal
Urogynecology (Philadelphia, Pa.)
ISSN: 2771-1897
Titre abrégé: Urogynecology (Phila)
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 9918452588006676
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
10 May 2024
10 May 2024
Historique:
medline:
10
5
2024
pubmed:
10
5
2024
entrez:
10
5
2024
Statut:
aheadofprint
Résumé
Understanding the risk of urinary retention with different prolapse repair surgical procedures is important for perioperative counseling. The study compared postoperative urinary retention rates between robotic sacrocolpopexy and robotic uterosacral ligament suspension. This institutional review board-exempt retrospective cohort study compared patients who underwent pelvic organ prolapse repair with robotic sacrocolpopexy (RSCP) and robotic uterosacral ligament suspension (RUSLS) between June 2018 and March 2022. Our primary outcome was the rate of acute postoperative urinary retention (POUR) in these groups. Secondary outcomes were the number of days needed to resolve urinary retention and persistent voiding dysfunction. Out of 298 patients, 258 underwent RSCP and 40 underwent RUSLS. Acute POUR was found in 73 patients (24%): 46 patients (18%) in the RSCP group versus 26 patients (65%) in the RUSLS group (P < 0.001). Multivariate analysis demonstrated a significantly higher rate of acute POUR after RUSLS (odds ratio [OR] = 17.92, confidence interval [CI] = 3.06-104.86; P = 0.001). Patients with an elevated preoperative postvoid residual volume >100 mL or concomitant midurethral sling were more likely to develop POUR (OR = 2.93, CI = 1.43-5.98; P = 0.003 and OR = 2.19, CI = 1.16-4.14; P = 0.016, respectively). While patients with higher parity were less likely to have urinary retention (OR = 0.71, CI = 0.53-0.96; P = 0.024), age, body mass index, prolapse stage, and concurrent posterior repair did not affect the urinary retention rate significantly. The number of days needed to resolve POUR and persistent voiding dysfunction were similar. Acute POUR appears more likely to develop after RUSLS compared to RSCP. Elevated preoperative postvoid residual volume and concomitant midurethral sling surgery independently increase the risk of POUR.
Identifiants
pubmed: 38726985
doi: 10.1097/SPV.0000000000001529
pii: 02273501-990000000-00226
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2024 American Urogynecologic Society. All rights reserved.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The authors have declared they have no conflicts of interest.
Références
Barber MD, Maher C. Epidemiology and outcome assessment of pelvic organ prolapse. Int Urogynecol J. 2013;24:1783–1790. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-013-2169-9.
doi: 10.1007/s00192-013-2169-9
Wu JM, Matthews CA, Conover MM, et al. Lifetime risk of stress urinary incontinence or pelvic organ prolapse surgery. Obstet Gynecol. 2014;123(6):1201–1206. doi:10.1097/AOG.0000000000000286.
doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000000286
Geller EJ. Prevention and management of postoperative urinary retention after urogynecologic surgery. Int J Womens Health. 2014;6:829–838. doi:10.2147/IJWH.S55383.
doi: 10.2147/IJWH.S55383
Sokol AI, Jelovsek JE, Walters MD, et al. Incidence and predictors of prolonged urinary retention after TVT with and without concurrent prolapse surgery. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2005;192(5):1537–1543. doi:10.1016/j.ajog.2004.10.623.
doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2004.10.623
Chung SM, Moon YJ, Jeon MJ, et al. Risk factors associated with voiding dysfunction after anti-incontinence surgery. Int Urogynecol J. 2010;21(12):1505–1509. doi:10.1007/s00192-010-1229-7.
doi: 10.1007/s00192-010-1229-7
McDermott CD, Tunitsky-Bitton E, Dueñas-Garcia OF, et al. Postoperative urinary retention. Urogynecology. 2023;29(4):381–396. doi:10.1097/SPV.0000000000001344.
doi: 10.1097/SPV.0000000000001344
Campagna G, Panico G, Lombisani A, et al. Laparoscopic uterosacral ligament suspension: a comprehensive, systematic literature review. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2022;277:57–70. doi:10.1016/j.ejogrb.2022.08.006 Epub 2022 Aug 12. PMID: 36007356.
doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2022.08.006
Vallabh-Patel V, Saiz C, Salamon C. Subjective and objective outcomes of robotic and vaginal high uterosacral ligament suspension. Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg. 2016;22(6):420–424. doi:10.1097/SPV.0000000000000306 PMID: 27465813.
doi: 10.1097/SPV.0000000000000306
Yune JJ, Cheng JW, Wagner H, et al. Postoperative urinary retention after pelvic organ prolapse repair: vaginal versus robotic transabdominal approach. Neurourol Urodyn. 2018;37(5):1794–1800. doi:10.1002/nau.23526 Epub 2018 Mar 23. PMID: 29572921.
doi: 10.1002/nau.23526
Harris PA, Taylor R, Thielke R, et al. Research Electronic Data Capture (REDCap) – a metadata-driven methodology and workflow process for providing translational research informatics support. J Biomed Inform. 2009;42(2):377–381. doi:10.1016/j.jbi.2008.08.010.
doi: 10.1016/j.jbi.2008.08.010
Harris PA, Taylor R, Minor BL, et al. The REDCap consortium: building an international community of software platform partners. J Biomed Inform. 2019;95:103208. doi:10.1016/j.jbi.2019.103208.
doi: 10.1016/j.jbi.2019.103208
Panico G, Campagna G, Caramazza D, et al. Laparoscopic high uterosacral ligament suspension: an alternative route for a traditional technique. Int Urogynecol J. 2018;29:1227–1229. doi:10.1007/s00192-018-3588-4.
doi: 10.1007/s00192-018-3588-4
Keita H, Diouf E, Tubach F, et al. Predictive factors of early postoperative urinary retention in the postanesthesia care unit. Anesth Analg. 2005;101(2):592–596. doi:10.1213/01.ANE.0000159165.90094.40.
doi: 10.1213/01.ANE.0000159165.90094.40
Book NM, Novi B, Novi JM, et al. Postoperative voiding dysfunction following posterior colporrhaphy. Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg. 2012;18(1):32–34. doi:10.1097/SPV.0b013e31824041a4 PMID: 22453264.
doi: 10.1097/SPV.0b013e31824041a4
Kim JH, Shin SH, Oh MM, et al. Factors affecting transient urinary retention after transobturator tape mid-urethral sling surgery for female patients with stress urinary incontinence: a single center experience. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2013;168(1):107–111. doi:10.1016/j.ejogrb.2012.12.013 Epub 2013 Jan 6.
doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2012.12.013
Turner LC, Kantartzis K, Shepherd JP. Predictors of postoperative acute urinary retention in women undergoing minimally invasive sacral colpopexy. Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg. 2015;21(1):39–42. doi:10.1097/SPV.0000000000000110.
doi: 10.1097/SPV.0000000000000110