Open Versus Percutaneous Fixation of Trigger Finger: Meta-Analysis of Clinical Outcomes.
Orthopedic
percutaneous
surgery
trigger finger
Journal
The Journal of hand surgery
ISSN: 1531-6564
Titre abrégé: J Hand Surg Am
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 7609631
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
10 May 2024
10 May 2024
Historique:
received:
27
11
2023
revised:
29
02
2024
accepted:
20
03
2024
medline:
10
5
2024
pubmed:
10
5
2024
entrez:
10
5
2024
Statut:
aheadofprint
Résumé
With variable and conflicting results to date, it remains unclear whether the percutaneous or open surgical A1 pulley release technique is superior regarding safety and efficacy. The goal of this meta-analysis was to compare the two techniques. PubMed, Cochrane, and Google Scholar (pages 1-20) were searched through August 2023. Eight randomized controlled trials met the inclusion criteria and were included in this meta-analysis. Of the eight included studies and 548 total patients, there were 278 subjects in the percutaneous release group and 270 subjects in the open release group. There was no significant difference between the two surgical techniques in postoperative rates of revision, complications, or pain. This meta-analysis found no significant difference between open and percutaneous techniques regarding the need for revision procedures, complications, or postoperative pain. Therefore, both open and percutaneous releases are appropriate. Therapeutic I.
Identifiants
pubmed: 38727666
pii: S0363-5023(24)00143-6
doi: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2024.03.010
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2024 American Society for Surgery of the Hand. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Conflicts of Interest No benefits in any form have been received or will be received related directly to this article.