A Practical Dosing Algorithm for Deep Neuromuscular Blockade During Total Intravenous Anesthesia: ROCURITHM.

BACKGROUND

The number of trials investigating the effects of deep neuromuscular blockade (NMB) on surgical conditions and patient outcomes is steadily increasing. Consensus on which surgical procedures benefit from deep NMB (a post tetanic count of 1-2) and how to implement it has not been reached. The ESAIC does not advise routine application but recommends use of deep NMB to improve surgical conditions on indication. This study investigates the optimal dosing strategy to reach and maintain adequate deep NMB during total intravenous anesthesia.

METHODS

Data from three trials investigating deep NMB during laparoscopic surgery with TIVA (n=424) was pooled to analyze the required rocuronium dose, when to start continuous infusion and how to adjust. The resulting algorithm was validated (n=32) and compared to the success rate in ongoing studies where the algorithm was not used (n=180).

RESULTS

The mean rocuronium dose based on actual bodyweight for PTC 1-2 was 1.0 ± 0.27 mg.kg -1.h -1 in the trials where mean duration of surgery was ±2 hours (116 minutes). An induction dose of 0.6 mg.kg -1 lead to a PTC of 1-5 in a quarter of patients after a mean of 11 minutes. The remaining patients were equally divided over too shallow (additional bolus and direct start of continuous infusion) or too deep; a ±15-minute wait after PTC 0 for return of PTC to ≥1. Using the proposed algorithm, a mean 76% of all 5-minute measurements throughout surgery were on target PTC 1-2 in the validation cohort. The algorithm performed significantly better than anesthesiology residents without the algorithm, even after a learning curve from 0-20 patients (42% on target, P≤.001, Cohen's d=1.4 [95% CI 0.9, 1.8]) to 81-100 patients (61% on target, P≤.05, Cohen's d=0.7 [95% CI 0.1, 1.2]).

CONCLUSIONS

We propose a dosing algorithm for deep NMB with rocuronium in patients receiving TIVA.

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2024 The Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. on behalf of the American Society of Anesthesiologists.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

Conflicts of Interest: Merck Sharp & Dohme was in no way involved in conceptualization, development of the algorithm, writing or any other aspect of this manuscript. The opinions presented here are those of the authors and do not represent the opinion of MSD or any of its partners. In addition, Albert Dahan reports financial relationships with Enalare and Trevena, and grants from FDA and ZonMw.