Treatment of the neck in residual/recurrent disease after chemoradiotherapy for advanced primary laryngeal cancer.

Concomitant chemoradiotherapy (CRT) is extensively used as primary organ preservation treatment for selected advanced laryngeal squamous cell carcinomas (LSCC). The oncologic outcomes of such regimens are comparable to those of total laryngectomy followed by adjuvant radiotherapy. However, the management of loco-regional recurrences after CRT remains a challenge, with salvage total laryngectomy being the only curative option. Furthermore, the decision whether to perform an elective neck dissection (END) in patients with rN0 necks, and the extent of the neck dissection in patients with rN + necks is still, a matter of debate. For rN0 patients, meta-analyses have reported occult metastasis rates ranging from 0 to 31 %, but no survival advantage for END. In addition, meta-analyses also showed a higher incidence of complications in patients who received an END. Therefore, END is not routinely recommended in addition to salvage laryngectomy. Although some evidence suggests a potential role of END for supraglottic and locally advanced cases, the decision to perform END should weigh benefits against potential complications. In rN + patients, several studies suggested that selective neck dissection (SND) is oncologically safe for patients with specific conditions: when lymph node metastases are not fixed and are absent at level IV or V. Super-selective neck dissection (SSND) may be an option when nodes are confined to one level. In conclusion, current evidence suggests that in rN0 necks routine END is not necessary and that in rN + necks with limited nodal recurrences SND or a SSND could be sufficient.

Informations de copyright

© 2024 Published by Elsevier Ltd.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

Declaration of competing interest In relation to the manuscript “Treatment of the neck in residual/recurrent advanced primary laryngeal cancer after chemoradiotherapy” submitted for publication to the European Journal of Surgical Oncology, the authors state that they have not conflicts of interest to disclose.