Participatory action research to develop and implement multicomponent, multilevel strategies for implementing colorectal cancer screening interventions in American Indian communities in New Mexico.
American Indian
Cancer screening
Colorectal cancer
Community based participatory research
Implementation science
Implementation strategies
Tribal communities
Journal
Implementation science communications
ISSN: 2662-2211
Titre abrégé: Implement Sci Commun
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101764360
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
10 May 2024
10 May 2024
Historique:
received:
06
10
2023
accepted:
02
05
2024
medline:
11
5
2024
pubmed:
11
5
2024
entrez:
10
5
2024
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Despite the effectiveness of colorectal cancer (CRC) screening, American Indians (AIs) have low screening rates in the US. Many AIs receive care at Indian Health Services, Tribal, and Urban Indian (I/T/U) healthcare facilities, where published evidence regarding the implementation of CRC screening interventions is lacking. To address this gap, the University of New Mexico Comprehensive Cancer Center and the Albuquerque Area Southwest Tribal Epidemiology Center collaborated with two tribally-operated healthcare facilities in New Mexico with the goal of improving CRC screening rates among New Mexico's AI communities. Guided by the principles of Community Based Participatory Research, we engaged providers from the two tribal healthcare facilities and tribal community members through focus group (two focus groups with providers (n = 15) and four focus group and listening sessions with community members (n = 65)), to elicit perspectives on the feasibility and appropriateness of implementing The Guide to Community Preventive Services (The Community Guide) recommended evidence-based interventions (EBIs) and strategies for increasing CRC screening. Within each tribal healthcare facility, we engaged a Multisector Action Team (MAT) that participated in an implementation survey to document the extent to which their healthcare facilities were implementing EBIs and strategies, and an organizational readiness survey that queried whether their healthcare facilities could implement additional strategies to improve uptake of CRC screening. The Community Guide recommended EBIs and strategies that received the most support as feasible and appropriate from community members included: one-on-one education from providers, reminders, small media, and interventions that reduced structural barriers. From the providers' perspective, feasible and acceptable strategies included one-on-one education, patient and provider reminders, and provider assessment and feedback. Universally, providers mentioned the need for patient navigators who could provide culturally appropriate education about CRC and assist with transportation, and improved support for coordinating clinical follow-up after screening. The readiness survey highlighted overall readiness of the tribal facility, while the implementation survey highlighted that few strategies were being implemented. Findings from this study contribute to the limited literature around implementation research at tribal healthcare facilities and informed the selection of specific implementation strategies to promote the uptake of CRC screening in AI communities.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Despite the effectiveness of colorectal cancer (CRC) screening, American Indians (AIs) have low screening rates in the US. Many AIs receive care at Indian Health Services, Tribal, and Urban Indian (I/T/U) healthcare facilities, where published evidence regarding the implementation of CRC screening interventions is lacking. To address this gap, the University of New Mexico Comprehensive Cancer Center and the Albuquerque Area Southwest Tribal Epidemiology Center collaborated with two tribally-operated healthcare facilities in New Mexico with the goal of improving CRC screening rates among New Mexico's AI communities.
METHODS
METHODS
Guided by the principles of Community Based Participatory Research, we engaged providers from the two tribal healthcare facilities and tribal community members through focus group (two focus groups with providers (n = 15) and four focus group and listening sessions with community members (n = 65)), to elicit perspectives on the feasibility and appropriateness of implementing The Guide to Community Preventive Services (The Community Guide) recommended evidence-based interventions (EBIs) and strategies for increasing CRC screening. Within each tribal healthcare facility, we engaged a Multisector Action Team (MAT) that participated in an implementation survey to document the extent to which their healthcare facilities were implementing EBIs and strategies, and an organizational readiness survey that queried whether their healthcare facilities could implement additional strategies to improve uptake of CRC screening.
RESULTS
RESULTS
The Community Guide recommended EBIs and strategies that received the most support as feasible and appropriate from community members included: one-on-one education from providers, reminders, small media, and interventions that reduced structural barriers. From the providers' perspective, feasible and acceptable strategies included one-on-one education, patient and provider reminders, and provider assessment and feedback. Universally, providers mentioned the need for patient navigators who could provide culturally appropriate education about CRC and assist with transportation, and improved support for coordinating clinical follow-up after screening. The readiness survey highlighted overall readiness of the tribal facility, while the implementation survey highlighted that few strategies were being implemented.
CONCLUSIONS
CONCLUSIONS
Findings from this study contribute to the limited literature around implementation research at tribal healthcare facilities and informed the selection of specific implementation strategies to promote the uptake of CRC screening in AI communities.
Identifiants
pubmed: 38730301
doi: 10.1186/s43058-024-00591-y
pii: 10.1186/s43058-024-00591-y
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
55Subventions
Organisme : NCI NIH HHS
ID : P30CA118100
Pays : United States
Informations de copyright
© 2024. The Author(s).
Références
Siegel RL, Miller KD, Wagle NS, Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2023. CA Cancer J Clin. 2023;73(1):17–48.
doi: 10.3322/caac.21763
pubmed: 36633525
Siegel RL, Wagle NS, Cercek A, Smith RA, Jemal A. Colorectal cancer statistics, 2023. CA Cancer J Clin. 2023;73(3):233–54.
doi: 10.3322/caac.21772
pubmed: 36856579
Hoffman RM, Espey DK, Rhyne RL, Gonzales M, Rajput A, Mishra SI, et al. Colorectal cancer incidence and mortality disparities in new Mexico. J Cancer Epidemiol. 2014;2014:239619.
doi: 10.1155/2014/239619
pubmed: 24527035
pmcid: 3910286
National Cancer Institute, Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Program. Table 6.1: Cancer of the Colon and Rectum (Invasive): Trends in SEER Incidence and U.S. Mortalityc Using the Joinpoint Regression Program, 1975–2017 With up to Five Joinpoints, 2000–2017 With up to Three Joinpoints, Both Sexes by Race/Ethnicity. Available from: https://seer.cancer.gov/archive/csr/1975_2017/browse_csr.php?sectionSEL=6&pageSEL=sect_06_table.01 . [cited 2023 Jul 25].
National Cancer Institute, Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Program. Table 6.21: Cancer of the Colon and Rectum (Invasive): age-adjusted rates and trends by race/ethnicity and sex. Available from: https://seer.cancer.gov/archive/csr/1975_2017/browse_csr.php?sectionSEL=6&pageSEL=sect_06_table.21 . [cited 2023 Jul 25].
Perdue DG, Haverkamp D, Perkins C, Daley CM, Provost E. Geographic variation in colorectal cancer incidence and mortality, age of onset, and stage at diagnosis among American Indian and Alaska Native people, 1990–2009. Am J Public Health. 2014;104 Suppl 3(Suppl 3):S404–414.
doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2013.301654
pubmed: 24754657
Espey DK, Wu XC, Swan J, Wiggins C, Jim MA, Ward E, et al. Annual report to the nation on the status of cancer, 1975–2004, featuring cancer in American Indians and Alaska Natives. Cancer. 2007;110(10):2119–52.
doi: 10.1002/cncr.23044
pubmed: 17939129
Perdue DG, Perkins C, Jackson-Thompson J, Coughlin SS, Ahmed F, Haverkamp DS, et al. Regional differences in colorectal cancer incidence, stage, and subsite among American Indians and Alaska Natives, 1999–2004. Cancer. 2008;113(5 Suppl):1179–90.
doi: 10.1002/cncr.23726
pubmed: 18720388
Cueto CV, Szeja S, Wertheim BC, Ong ES, Tsikitis VL. Disparities in treatment and survival of white and Native American patients with colorectal cancer: a SEER analysis. J Am Coll Surg. 2011;213(4):469–74.
doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2011.05.026
pubmed: 21723155
Clegg LX, Li FP, Hankey BF, Chu K, Edwards BK. Cancer survival among US whites and minorities: a SEER (Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results) program population-based study. Arch Intern Med. 2002;162(17):1985–93.
doi: 10.1001/archinte.162.17.1985
pubmed: 12230422
Jemal A, Clegg LX, Ward E, Ries LAG, Wu X, Jamison PM, et al. Annual report to the nation on the status of cancer, 1975–2001, with a special feature regarding survival. Cancer. 2004;101(1):3–27.
doi: 10.1002/cncr.20288
pubmed: 15221985
Lin JS, Perdue LA, Henrikson NB, Bean SI, Blasi PR. Screening for colorectal cancer: updated evidence report and systematic review for the US preventive services task force. JAMA. 2021;325(19):1978–98.
doi: 10.1001/jama.2021.4417
pubmed: 34003220
US Preventive Services Task Force, Davidson KW, Barry MJ, Mangione CM, Cabana M, Caughey AB, et al. Screening for colorectal cancer: US preventive services task force recommendation statement. JAMA. 2021;325(19):1965–77.
doi: 10.1001/jama.2021.6238
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Use of colorectal cancer screening tests. 2023. Available from: https://www.cdc.gov/cancer/colorectal/statistics/use-screening-tests-BRFSS.htm . [cited 2023 Sep 6].
Johnson-Jennings MD, Tarraf W, Xavier Hill K, González HM. United States colorectal cancer screening practices among American Indians/Alaska Natives, blacks, and non-Hispanic whites in the new millennium (2001 to 2010). Cancer. 2014;120(20):3192–299.
doi: 10.1002/cncr.28855
pubmed: 25123695
Pandhi N, Guadagnolo BA, Kanekar S, Petereit DG, Smith MA. Cancer screening in Native Americans from the Northern Plains. Am J Prev Med. 2010;38(4):389–95.
doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2009.12.027
pubmed: 20307807
pmcid: 2851544
Indian Health Service. GPRA report summary. 2021. Available from: https://www.ihs.gov/quality/government-performance-and-results-act-gpra/gpra-report-summary-2021/ .
Neta G, Clyne M, Chambers DA. Dissemination and implementation research at the National Cancer Institute: a review of funded studies (2006–2019) and opportunities to advance the field. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2021;30(2):260–7.
doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-20-0795
pubmed: 33268488
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Using the community guide. Guide to community preventive services. 2023. Available from: https://www.thecommunityguide.org/pages/using-community-guide.html . [cited 2023 Sep 6].
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Increasing cancer screening: multicomponent interventions - colorectal cancer. 2017. Available from: https://www.thecommunityguide.org/media/pdf/OnePager-CancerScreening-Multicomponent-ColorectalCancer.pdf . [cited 2023 Sep 6].
Taplin SH, Anhang Price R, Edwards HM, Foster MK, Breslau ES, Chollette V, et al. Introduction: understanding and influencing multilevel factors across the cancer care continuum. J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr. 2012;2012(44):2–10.
doi: 10.1093/jncimonographs/lgs008
pubmed: 22623590
pmcid: 3482968
Chambers DA, Glasgow RE, Stange KC. The dynamic sustainability framework: addressing the paradox of sustainment amid ongoing change. Implement Sci. 2013;8:117.
doi: 10.1186/1748-5908-8-117
pubmed: 24088228
pmcid: 3852739
Institute of Medicine (US). A foundation for evidence-driven practice: a rapid learning system for cancer care: workshop summary. Washington (DC): National Academies Press (US); 2010. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK220254/ . [cited 2023 Jul 25].
Indian Health Service. IHS Profile. 2020. Available from: https://www.ihs.gov/newsroom/factsheets/ihsprofile/#:~:text=FY%202019%20IHS%20expenditure%20per%20user%20population%3A%20%244%2C078 . [cited 2023 Oct 3].
United States Government Accountability Office. Indian Health Service: Health Care Services Are Not Always Available to Native Americans. 2005. Report No.: GAO-05-789. Available from: https://www.gao.gov/assets/gao-05-789.pdf . [cited 2023 Oct 3].
Lee KMN, Hunleth J, Rolf L, Maki J, Lewis-Thames M, Oestmann K, et al. Distance and transportation barriers to colorectal cancer screening in a rural community. J Prim Care Community Health. 2023;14:21501319221147130.
doi: 10.1177/21501319221147126
pubmed: 36594346
pmcid: 9829879
Jazowski SA, Sico IP, Lindquist JH, Smith VA, Bosworth HB, Danus S, et al. Transportation as a barrier to colorectal cancer care. BMC Health Serv Res. 2021;21(1):332.
doi: 10.1186/s12913-021-06339-x
pubmed: 33849524
pmcid: 8045363
Daley CM, James AS, Filippi M, Weir M, Braiuca S, Kaur B, et al. American Indian community leader and provider views of needs and barriers to colorectal cancer screening. J Health Dispar Res Pract. 2012;5(2):2.
pubmed: 23242456
pmcid: 3520438
Filippi MK, James AS, Brokenleg S, Talawyma M, Perdue DG, Choi WS, et al. Views, barriers, and suggestions for colorectal cancer screening among american Indian women older than 50 years in the midwest. J Prim Care Community Health. 2013;4(3):160–6.
doi: 10.1177/2150131912457574
pubmed: 23799701
Born W, Engelman K, Greiner KA, Bhattacharya SB, Hall S, Hou Q, et al. Colorectal cancer screening, perceived discrimination, and low-income and trust in doctors: a survey of minority patients. BMC Public Health. 2009;9:363.
doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-9-363
pubmed: 19781085
pmcid: 2761405
Rogers CR, Perdue DG, Boucher K, Korous KM, Brooks E, Petersen E, et al. Masculinity barriers to ever completing colorectal cancer screening among American Indian/Alaska native, black, and white men (ages 45–75). Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022;19(5):3071.
doi: 10.3390/ijerph19053071
pubmed: 35270762
pmcid: 8910566
Warne D, Kaur J, Perdue D. American Indian/Alaska Native cancer policy: systemic approaches to reducing cancer disparities. J Cancer Educ. 2012;27(1 Suppl):S18–23.
doi: 10.1007/s13187-012-0315-6
pubmed: 22311689
James AS, Filippi MK, Pacheco CM, Cully L, Perdue D, Choi WS, et al. Barriers to colorectal cancer screening among American Indian men aged 50 or older, Kansas and Missouri, 2006–2008. Prev Chronic Dis. 2013;10:E170.
doi: 10.5888/pcd10.130067
pubmed: 24135394
pmcid: 3804015
Schumacher MC, Slattery ML, Lanier AP, Ma KN, Edwards S, Ferucci ED, et al. Prevalence and predictors of cancer screening among American Indian and Alaska native people: the EARTH study. Cancer Causes Control. 2008;19(7):725–37.
doi: 10.1007/s10552-008-9135-8
pubmed: 18307048
pmcid: 2574651
Mishra SI, Adsul P, Leekity S, Rodman J, Sussman AL, Kelly K, et al. A culturally informed model to enhance breast, cervical, and colorectal cancer screenings: perspectives of American Indian adults and healthcare providers in rural New Mexico. Cancer Causes Control. 2023;34:10855.
doi: 10.1007/s10552-023-01721-y
Eisman AB, Quanbeck A, Bounthavong M, Panattoni L, Glasgow RE. Implementation science issues in understanding, collecting, and using cost estimates: a multi-stakeholder perspective. Implement Sci. 2021;16(1):75.
doi: 10.1186/s13012-021-01143-x
pubmed: 34344411
pmcid: 8330022
Israel BA, Coombe CM, Cheezum RR, Schulz AJ, McGranaghan RJ, Lichtenstein R, et al. Community-based participatory research: a capacity-building approach for policy advocacy aimed at eliminating health disparities. Am J Public Health. 2010;100(11):2094–102.
doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2009.170506
pubmed: 20864728
pmcid: 2951933
Israel BA, Schulz AJ, Parker EA, Becker AB. Review of community-based research: assessing partnership approaches to improve public health. Annu Rev Public Health. 1998;19:173–202.
doi: 10.1146/annurev.publhealth.19.1.173
pubmed: 9611617
Hsieh HF, Shannon SE. Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qual Health Res. 2005;15(9):1277–88.
doi: 10.1177/1049732305276687
pubmed: 16204405
Salmona M, Lieber E, Kaczynski D. Qualitative and mixed methods data analysis using dedoose: a practical approach for research across the social sciences. California: SAGE Publications; 2019. p. 301.
Adams SA, Rohweder CL, Leeman J, Friedman DB, Gizlice Z, Vanderpool RC, et al. Use of evidence-based interventions and implementation strategies to increase colorectal cancer screening in federally qualified health centers. J Community Health. 2018;43(6):1044.
doi: 10.1007/s10900-018-0520-2
pubmed: 29770945
pmcid: 6239992
Shea CM, Jacobs SR, Esserman DA, Bruce K, Weiner BJ. Organizational readiness for implementing change: a psychometric assessment of a new measure. Implement Sci. 2014;9:7.
doi: 10.1186/1748-5908-9-7
pubmed: 24410955
pmcid: 3904699
Fink A, Kosecoff J, Chassin M, Brook RH. Consensus methods: characteristics and guidelines for use. Am J Public Health. 1984;74(9):979–83.
doi: 10.2105/AJPH.74.9.979
pubmed: 6380323
pmcid: 1651783
Aczel B, Szaszi B, Nilsonne G, van den Akker OR, Albers CJ, van Assen MA, et al. Consensus-based guidance for conducting and reporting multi-analyst studies. Elife. 2021;10:e72185.
doi: 10.7554/eLife.72185
pubmed: 34751133
pmcid: 8626083