Discharge within 24 h, transvaginal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery- more suitable for ambulatory surgery in gynecology procedures: a retrospective study.
Humans
Female
Retrospective Studies
Natural Orifice Endoscopic Surgery
/ methods
Ambulatory Surgical Procedures
/ methods
Adult
Gynecologic Surgical Procedures
/ methods
Middle Aged
Vagina
/ surgery
Patient Discharge
/ statistics & numerical data
Operative Time
Laparoscopy
/ methods
Length of Stay
/ statistics & numerical data
Pain, Postoperative
Ambulatory surgery
Gynecology procedures
Laparo-endoscopic single-site surgery
VNOTES
Journal
BMC women's health
ISSN: 1472-6874
Titre abrégé: BMC Womens Health
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101088690
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
10 May 2024
10 May 2024
Historique:
received:
06
11
2023
accepted:
06
05
2024
medline:
11
5
2024
pubmed:
11
5
2024
entrez:
10
5
2024
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (NOTES) is an achievement in the field of minimally invasive surgery. However, the vantage point of vaginal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (vNOTES) in gynecologicalprocedures remains unclear. The main purpose of this study was to compare vNOTES with laparo-endoscopic single-site surgery, and to determine which procedure is more suitable for ambulatory surgery in gynecologic procedures. This retrospective observational study was conducted at the Department of Gynecology, Chengdu Women's and Children's Central Hospital. The 207 enrolled patients had accepted vNOTES and laparo-endoscopic single-site surgery in gynecology procedures from February 2021 to March 2022. Surgically relevant information regarding patients who underwent ambulatory surgery was collected, and 64 females underwent vNOTES. Multiple outcomes were analyzed in 207 patients. The Wilcoxon Rank-Sum test showed that there were statistically significant differences between the vNOTES and laparo-endoscopic single-site surgery groups in terms of postoperative pain score (0 vs. 1 scores, p = 0.026), duration of anesthesia (90 vs. 101 min, p = 0.025), surgery time (65 vs. 80 min, p = 0.015), estimated blood loss (20 vs. 40 mL, p < 0.001), and intestinal exhaustion time (12.20 vs. 17.14 h, p < 0.001). Treatment with vNOTES resulted in convenience, both with respect to time savings and hemorrhage volume in surgery and with respect to the quality of the prognosis. These comprehensive data reveal the capacity of vNOTES to increase surgical efficiency. vNOTES in gynecological procedures may demonstrate sufficient feasibility and provide a new medical strategy compared with laparo-endoscopic single-site surgery for ambulatory surgery in gynecological procedures.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (NOTES) is an achievement in the field of minimally invasive surgery. However, the vantage point of vaginal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (vNOTES) in gynecologicalprocedures remains unclear. The main purpose of this study was to compare vNOTES with laparo-endoscopic single-site surgery, and to determine which procedure is more suitable for ambulatory surgery in gynecologic procedures.
METHODS
METHODS
This retrospective observational study was conducted at the Department of Gynecology, Chengdu Women's and Children's Central Hospital. The 207 enrolled patients had accepted vNOTES and laparo-endoscopic single-site surgery in gynecology procedures from February 2021 to March 2022. Surgically relevant information regarding patients who underwent ambulatory surgery was collected, and 64 females underwent vNOTES.
RESULTS
RESULTS
Multiple outcomes were analyzed in 207 patients. The Wilcoxon Rank-Sum test showed that there were statistically significant differences between the vNOTES and laparo-endoscopic single-site surgery groups in terms of postoperative pain score (0 vs. 1 scores, p = 0.026), duration of anesthesia (90 vs. 101 min, p = 0.025), surgery time (65 vs. 80 min, p = 0.015), estimated blood loss (20 vs. 40 mL, p < 0.001), and intestinal exhaustion time (12.20 vs. 17.14 h, p < 0.001). Treatment with vNOTES resulted in convenience, both with respect to time savings and hemorrhage volume in surgery and with respect to the quality of the prognosis.
CONCLUSION
CONCLUSIONS
These comprehensive data reveal the capacity of vNOTES to increase surgical efficiency. vNOTES in gynecological procedures may demonstrate sufficient feasibility and provide a new medical strategy compared with laparo-endoscopic single-site surgery for ambulatory surgery in gynecological procedures.
Identifiants
pubmed: 38730489
doi: 10.1186/s12905-024-03132-w
pii: 10.1186/s12905-024-03132-w
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Observational Study
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
283Informations de copyright
© 2024. The Author(s).
Références
Kale A, Sarıibrahim B. Bas¸ Ol, Hysterectomy and salphingoopherectomy by Transvaginal Natural Orifice Transluminal endoscopic surgery (NOTES): Turkish surgeons’ initial experience. Int J Surg. 2017;47(November):62–8.
doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2017.09.062
pubmed: 28951308
Kalloo AN, Singh VK, Jagannath SB, et al. Flexible transgastric peritoneoscopy: a novel approach to diagnostic and therapeutic interventions in the peritoneal cavity. Gastrointest Endosc. 2004;60:114–7.
doi: 10.1016/S0016-5107(04)01309-4
pubmed: 15229442
Zorron R, Filgueiras M, Maggioni LC, Pombo L, Lopes Carvalho G. Lacerda Oliveira, NOTES. Transvaginal cholecystectomy: report of the first case. Surg Innov. 2007;14:279–83.
doi: 10.1177/1553350607311090
pubmed: 18178917
Baekelandt J. Transvaginal naturalorifice transluminal endoscopic surgery: a new approach to myomectomy. Fertil Steril. 2018;109:179.
doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2017.09.009
pubmed: 29129378
Baekelandt J, Vercammen J. IMELDA transvaginal approach to ectopic pregnancy: diagnosis by transvaginal hydrolaparoscopy and treatment by transvaginal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery. Fertil Steril. 2017;107:e1–2.
doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2016.09.024
pubmed: 27793386
Kaya C. The comparison of Surgical outcomes following laparoscopic hysterectomy and vNOTES hysterectomy in obese patients. J Invest Surg. 2022;35(4):862–7.
doi: 10.1080/08941939.2021.1927262
pubmed: 34036898
Naoyuki, Yoshiki. Review of transvaginal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery in gynecology. Gynecol Minim Invasive Ther. 2017;6:1–5. (February (1)).
doi: 10.1016/j.gmit.2016.11.007
Li CB, Hua KQ. Transvaginal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (vNOTES) in gynecologic surgeries: a systematic review. Asian J Surg. 2020;43:44–51.
doi: 10.1016/j.asjsur.2019.07.014
pubmed: 31444108
Baekelandt J, De Mulder PA, Le Roy I, Mathieu C, Laenen A, Enzlin P, et al. Postoperative outcomes and quality of life following hysterectomy by natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (NOTES) compared to laparoscopy in women with a non-prolapsed uterus and benign gynaecological disease: a systematic review and metaanalysis. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2017;208:6–15.
doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2016.10.044
pubmed: 27880893
International Association for Ambulatory. Surgery (IAAS)ambulatory surgery handbook. London, UK: International Association for Ambulatory Surgery; 2013.
Ripolles-Melchor J. Association between use of enhanced recovery after surgery protocols and postoperative complications after gastric surgery for cancer (POWER 4): a nationwide, prospective multicentre study. Cir. Esp. (Engl. Ed.). 2023.
Nelson G. Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS(R)) society guidelines for gynecologic oncology: addressing implementation challenges – 2023 update. Gynecol Oncol. 2023;173:58–67.
doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2023.04.009
pubmed: 37086524
Nahas S, Feigenberg T, Park S. Feasibility and safety of same-day discharge after minimally invasive hysterectomy in gynecologic oncology: a systematic review of the literature. Gynecol Oncol. 2016;143:439–42.
doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2016.07.113
pubmed: 27475523
Gien LT, Kupets R, Covens A. Feasibility of same-day discharge after laparoscopic surgery in gynecologic oncology. Gynecol Oncol. 2011;121:339–43.
doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2010.12.344
pubmed: 21292313
Hurt WG. Outpatient gynecologic procedures. Surg Clin North Am. 1991;71:1099–110.
doi: 10.1016/S0039-6109(16)45537-4
pubmed: 1833837
Huang L. Transvaginal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery in gynecological procedure: experience of a women’s and children’s medical center from China. J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2022;48:2926–34.
doi: 10.1111/jog.15402
pubmed: 36054651
Lee CL, Wu KY, Su H, Wu PJ, Han CM, Yen CF. Hysterectomy by transvaginal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (NOTES): a series of 137 patients. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2014;21:818–24.
doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2014.03.011
pubmed: 24681063
Lerner VT, May G, Iglesia CB. Vaginal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery revolution: the next frontier in gynecologic minimally invasive surgery. J Soc Laparoendosc Surg. 2023;27(1).
Chaccour C, Giannini A, Golia D’Augè T, et al. Hysterectomy using vaginal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery compared with classic laparoscopic hysterectomy: a new advantageous approach? A systematic review on surgical outcomes. Gynecol Obstet Invest. 2023;88:187–96.
doi: 10.1159/000530797
pubmed: 37231836
Karakaş S. Comparison of vNOTES technique with conventional laparoscopy in gynecological emergency cases. Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol. 2022;31(5):803–9.
doi: 10.1080/13645706.2021.2025111
pubmed: 35073493
Kaya C. Hysterectomy by vaginal-assisted natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery: initial experience with twelve cases. J Turk Ger Gynecol Assoc. 2018;19(1):34–8.
doi: 10.4274/jtgga.2017.0075
pubmed: 29503260
pmcid: 5838776
Kaya C. Conventional laparoscopy or vaginally assisted natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery for Adnexal pathologies: a paired sample cross-sectional study. J Invest Surg. 2021;34(11):1185–90.
doi: 10.1080/08941939.2020.1789246
pubmed: 32633168
Baekelandt JF, De Mulder PA, Le Roy I, Mathieu C, Laenen A, Enzlin P, et al. Hysterectomy by transvaginal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery versus laparoscopy as a day-care procedure: a randomised controlled trial. BJOG. 2019;126:105–13.
doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.15504
pubmed: 30325565
Xie A. Transvaginal natural orifice endoscopic surgery for ovarian cystectomy: a more suitable surgical approach for the day-care procedure. Front Med (Lausanne). 2023;10:1164970.
doi: 10.3389/fmed.2023.1164970
pubmed: 37275379
Liu Y. Transvaginal natural orifice endoscopic surgery for tubal ectopic pregnancy: a more suitable surgical approach for enhanced recovery after surgery. Heliyon. 2024;10(2):e24945.
doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e24945
pubmed: 38312673
pmcid: 10835374