The Influence of Thickness on Light Transmission for Pre- and Fully Crystallized Chairside CAD/CAM Lithium Disilicate Ceramics.

CAD-DAM ceramics esthetic dentistry lithium disilicate

Journal

Materials (Basel, Switzerland)
ISSN: 1996-1944
Titre abrégé: Materials (Basel)
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101555929

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
26 Apr 2024
Historique:
received: 18 03 2024
revised: 19 04 2024
accepted: 22 04 2024
medline: 11 5 2024
pubmed: 11 5 2024
entrez: 11 5 2024
Statut: epublish

Résumé

This in vitro study aimed to compare the light-transmission properties of two chairside CAD/CAM lithium disilicate (LD) ceramics (a novel fully crystallized and a traditional pre-crystallized) across varying thicknesses. One hundred flat specimens were obtained from precrystallized (e.max CAD, Ivoclar Vivadent, Schaan, Liechtenstein) and fully crystallized (LiSi GC Block; GC, Tokyo, Japan) LD at five different thicknesses (0.5, 0.75, 1.0, 1.50 and 2.0 mm). All specimens were polished with a polishing system for lithium disilicate restorations following recommendations from the manufacturer. Light transmission was evaluated with a radiometer. The statistical analysis between e.max CAD and LiSi GC Block was performed using a Mann-Whitney test for each thickness at a significance level of 0.05 ( Light transmittance was significantly affected by ceramic thickness. The 0.5 mm thick specimens exhibited the highest transmittance values compared to all other groups, while a light transmittance of 0.00 was observed in the 2.0 mm thick specimens for both e.max CAD and LiSi GC Block. In the comparison between e.max CAD and LiSi GC Block according to thickness, there was a statistically significant difference exclusively between groups with a thickness of 1.50 mm ( Light transmission for pre- and fully crystallized CAD/CAM lithium disilicate ceramics only showed a statistical difference at the thickness of 1.50 mm ( A thickness of 2 mm for chairside CAD/CAM lithium disilicate ceramics, whether pre-crystallized or fully crystallized, necessitates the use of dual-cure resin luting cement due to reduced light transmission.

Identifiants

pubmed: 38730851
pii: ma17092045
doi: 10.3390/ma17092045
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Auteurs

Franciele Floriani (F)

Department of Prosthodontics, The University of Iowa College of Dentistry and Dental Clinics, Iowa City, IA 52241, USA.

Salahaldeen Abuhammoud (S)

Department of Prosthodontics, The University of Iowa College of Dentistry and Dental Clinics, Iowa City, IA 52241, USA.

Silvia Rojas-Rueda (S)

Division of Dental Biomaterials, The University of Alabama at Birmingham School of Dentistry, Birmingham, AL 35233, USA.

Amit Unnadkat (A)

Division of Operative Dentistry, Department of General Dentistry, University of Tennessee Health Science Center, College of Dentistry, Memphis, TN 38103, USA.

Nicholas G Fischer (NG)

Minnesota Dental Research for Biomaterials and Biomechanics, University of Minnesota School of Dentistry, Minneapolis, MN 55455, USA.

Chin-Chuan Fu (CC)

Department of Restorative Sciences, The University of Alabama at Birmingham School of Dentistry, Birmingham, AL 35233, USA.

Carlos A Jurado (CA)

Division of Operative Dentistry, Department of General Dentistry, University of Tennessee Health Science Center, College of Dentistry, Memphis, TN 38103, USA.

Classifications MeSH