Changes in visually and auditory attended audiovisual speech processing in cochlear implant users: A longitudinal ERP study.

Audiovisual speech perception Cochlear implant Cortical plasticity Electrical neuroimaging Event-related potentials Theta and beta oscillation power Top-down attention effects

Journal

Hearing research
ISSN: 1878-5891
Titre abrégé: Hear Res
Pays: Netherlands
ID NLM: 7900445

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
27 Apr 2024
Historique:
received: 31 01 2024
revised: 25 03 2024
accepted: 26 04 2024
medline: 12 5 2024
pubmed: 12 5 2024
entrez: 11 5 2024
Statut: aheadofprint

Résumé

Limited auditory input, whether caused by hearing loss or by electrical stimulation through a cochlear implant (CI), can be compensated by the remaining senses. Specifically for CI users, previous studies reported not only improved visual skills, but also altered cortical processing of unisensory visual and auditory stimuli. However, in multisensory scenarios, it is still unclear how auditory deprivation (before implantation) and electrical hearing experience (after implantation) affect cortical audiovisual speech processing. Here, we present a prospective longitudinal electroencephalography (EEG) study which systematically examined the deprivation- and CI-induced alterations of cortical processing of audiovisual words by comparing event-related potentials (ERPs) in postlingually deafened CI users before and after implantation (five weeks and six months of CI use). A group of matched normal-hearing (NH) listeners served as controls. The participants performed a word-identification task with congruent and incongruent audiovisual words, focusing their attention on either the visual (lip movement) or the auditory speech signal. This allowed us to study the (top-down) attention effect on the (bottom-up) sensory cortical processing of audiovisual speech. When compared to the NH listeners, the CI candidates (before implantation) and the CI users (after implantation) exhibited enhanced lipreading abilities and an altered cortical response at the N1 latency range (90-150 ms) that was characterized by a decreased theta oscillation power (4-8 Hz) and a smaller amplitude in the auditory cortex. After implantation, however, the auditory-cortex response gradually increased and developed a stronger intra-modal connectivity. Nevertheless, task efficiency and activation in the visual cortex was significantly modulated in both groups by focusing attention on the visual as compared to the auditory speech signal, with the NH listeners additionally showing an attention-dependent decrease in beta oscillation power (13-30 Hz). In sum, these results suggest remarkable deprivation effects on audiovisual speech processing in the auditory cortex, which partially reverse after implantation. Although even experienced CI users still show distinct audiovisual speech processing compared to NH listeners, pronounced effects of (top-down) direction of attention on (bottom-up) audiovisual processing can be observed in both groups. However, NH listeners but not CI users appear to show enhanced allocation of cognitive resources in visually as compared to auditory attended audiovisual speech conditions, which supports our behavioural observations of poorer lipreading abilities and reduced visual influence on audition in NH listeners as compared to CI users.

Identifiants

pubmed: 38733710
pii: S0378-5955(24)00076-5
doi: 10.1016/j.heares.2024.109023
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

109023

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2024. Published by Elsevier B.V.

Auteurs

Anna Weglage (A)

Head and Neck Surgery, Audiology and Pediatric Audiology, Cochlear Implant Centre, University of Cologne, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Germany. Electronic address: anna.weglage1@uk-koeln.de.

Natalie Layer (N)

Head and Neck Surgery, Audiology and Pediatric Audiology, Cochlear Implant Centre, University of Cologne, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Germany.

Hartmut Meister (H)

Head and Neck Surgery, Audiology and Pediatric Audiology, Cochlear Implant Centre, University of Cologne, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Germany; Jean-Uhrmacher-Institute for Clinical ENT Research, University of Cologne, Germany.

Verena Müller (V)

Head and Neck Surgery, Audiology and Pediatric Audiology, Cochlear Implant Centre, University of Cologne, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Germany.

Ruth Lang-Roth (R)

Head and Neck Surgery, Audiology and Pediatric Audiology, Cochlear Implant Centre, University of Cologne, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Germany.

Martin Walger (M)

Head and Neck Surgery, Audiology and Pediatric Audiology, Cochlear Implant Centre, University of Cologne, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Germany; Jean-Uhrmacher-Institute for Clinical ENT Research, University of Cologne, Germany.

Pascale Sandmann (P)

Department of Otolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Carl von Ossietzky University of Oldenburg, Germany; Research Center Neurosensory Science University of Oldenburg, Germany; Cluster of Excellence "Hearing4all", University of Oldenburg, Germany.

Classifications MeSH