Faecal egg count reduction tests and nemabiome analysis reveal high frequency of multi-resistant parasites on sheep farms in north-east Germany involving multiple strongyle parasite species.


Journal

International journal for parasitology. Drugs and drug resistance
ISSN: 2211-3207
Titre abrégé: Int J Parasitol Drugs Drug Resist
Pays: Netherlands
ID NLM: 101576715

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
05 May 2024
Historique:
received: 02 02 2024
revised: 29 04 2024
accepted: 30 04 2024
medline: 12 5 2024
pubmed: 12 5 2024
entrez: 11 5 2024
Statut: aheadofprint

Résumé

Anthelmintic resistance in sheep parasitic gastrointestinal nematodes is widespread and a severe health and economic issue but prevalence of resistance and involved parasite species are unknown in Germany. Here, the faecal egg count reduction test (FECRT) was performed on eight farms using fenbendazole, ivermectin and moxidectin and on four farms using only moxidectin. A questionnaire was used to obtain data on management practices to potentially identify risk factors for presence of resistance. All requirements of the recently revised WAAVP guideline for diagnosing anthelmintic resistance using the FECRT were applied. Nematode species composition in pre- and post-treatment samples was analysed with the nemabiome approach. Using the eggCounts statistic package, resistance against fenbendazole, ivermectin and moxidectin was found on 7/8, 8/8 and 8/12 farms, respectively. No formal risk factor analysis was conducted since resistance was present on most farms. Comparison with the bayescount R package results revealed substantial agreement between methods (Cohen's κ = 0.774). In contrast, interpretation of data comparing revised and original WAAVP guidelines resulted in moderate agreement (Cohen's κ = 0.444). The FECR for moxidectin was significantly higher than for ivermectin and fenbendazole. Nemabiome data identified 4 to 12 species in pre-treatment samples and treatments caused a small but significant decrease in species diversity (inverse Simpson index). Non-metric multidimensional scaling and k-means clustering were used to identify common patterns in pre- and post-treatment samples. However, post-treatment samples were scattered among the pre-treatment samples. Resistant parasite species differed between farms. In conclusion, the revised FECRT guideline allows robust detection of anthelmintic resistance. Resistance was widespread and involved multiple parasite species. Resistance against both drug classes on the same farm was common. Further studies including additional drugs (levamisole, monepantel, closantel) should combine sensitive FECRTs with nemabiome data to comprehensively characterise the anthelmintic susceptibility status of sheep nematodes in Germany.

Identifiants

pubmed: 38733882
pii: S2211-3207(24)00028-9
doi: 10.1016/j.ijpddr.2024.100547
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

100547

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2024 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

Declaration of competing interest The authors declare the following financial interests/personal relationships which may be considered as potential competing interests: Georg von Samson-Himmelstjerna (GvSH) reports financial support was provided by Federal Office of Consumer Protection and Food Safety, Berlin, Germany. GvSH is a member of the editorial board of Int. J. Parasitol. Drugs Drug Rest. Furthermore, he declares that he has previous and ongoing research and consultancy collaborations with several veterinary pharmaceutical and diagnostic companies.

Auteurs

Jürgen Krücken (J)

Institute for Parasitology and Tropical Veterinary Medicine, Freie Universität Berlin, Germany; Veterinary Centre for Resistance Research, Freie Universität Berlin, Berlin, Germany.

Paula Ehnert (P)

Institute for Parasitology and Tropical Veterinary Medicine, Freie Universität Berlin, Germany; Veterinary Centre for Resistance Research, Freie Universität Berlin, Berlin, Germany.

Stefan Fiedler (S)

Federal Office of Consumer Protection and Food Safety, Berlin, Germany.

Fabian Horn (F)

Federal Office of Consumer Protection and Food Safety, Berlin, Germany.

Christina S Helm (CS)

Institute for Parasitology and Tropical Veterinary Medicine, Freie Universität Berlin, Germany; Veterinary Centre for Resistance Research, Freie Universität Berlin, Berlin, Germany.

Sabrina Ramünke (S)

Institute for Parasitology and Tropical Veterinary Medicine, Freie Universität Berlin, Germany; Veterinary Centre for Resistance Research, Freie Universität Berlin, Berlin, Germany.

Tanja Bartmann (T)

Institute for Parasitology and Tropical Veterinary Medicine, Freie Universität Berlin, Germany; Veterinary Centre for Resistance Research, Freie Universität Berlin, Berlin, Germany.

Alexandra Kahl (A)

Institute for Parasitology and Tropical Veterinary Medicine, Freie Universität Berlin, Germany; Veterinary Centre for Resistance Research, Freie Universität Berlin, Berlin, Germany.

Ann Neubert (A)

Federal Office of Consumer Protection and Food Safety, Berlin, Germany.

Wiebke Weiher (W)

Federal Office of Consumer Protection and Food Safety, Berlin, Germany.

Ricarda Daher (R)

Federal Office of Consumer Protection and Food Safety, Berlin, Germany.

Werner Terhalle (W)

Federal Office of Consumer Protection and Food Safety, Berlin, Germany.

Alexandra Klabunde-Negatsch (A)

Federal Office of Consumer Protection and Food Safety, Berlin, Germany.

Stephan Steuber (S)

Federal Office of Consumer Protection and Food Safety, Berlin, Germany.

Georg von Samson-Himmelstjerna (G)

Institute for Parasitology and Tropical Veterinary Medicine, Freie Universität Berlin, Germany; Veterinary Centre for Resistance Research, Freie Universität Berlin, Berlin, Germany. Electronic address: samson.georg@fu-berlin.de.

Classifications MeSH