Can 3D Multiparametric Ultrasound Imaging Predict Prostate Biopsy Outcome?

Computer-assisted diagnosis Dynamic contrast-enhanced ultrasound Multiparametric ultrasound Prostate cancer Ultrasound shear-wave elastography

Journal

Ultrasound in medicine & biology
ISSN: 1879-291X
Titre abrégé: Ultrasound Med Biol
Pays: England
ID NLM: 0410553

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
10 May 2024
Historique:
received: 28 11 2023
revised: 16 03 2024
accepted: 14 04 2024
medline: 12 5 2024
pubmed: 12 5 2024
entrez: 11 5 2024
Statut: aheadofprint

Résumé

To assess the value of 3D multiparametric ultrasound imaging, combining hemodynamic and tissue stiffness quantifications by machine learning, for the prediction of prostate biopsy outcomes. After signing informed consent, 54 biopsy-naïve patients underwent a 3D dynamic contrast-enhanced ultrasound (DCE-US) recording, a multi-plane 2D shear-wave elastography (SWE) scan with manual sweeping from base to apex of the prostate, and received 12-core systematic biopsies (SBx). 3D maps of 18 hemodynamic parameters were extracted from the 3D DCE-US quantification and a 3D SWE elasticity map was reconstructed based on the multi-plane 2D SWE acquisitions. Subsequently, all the 3D maps were segmented and subdivided into 12 regions corresponding to the SBx locations. Per region, the set of 19 computed parameters was further extended by derivation of eight radiomic features per parameter. Based on this feature set, a multiparametric ultrasound approach was implemented using five different classifiers together with a sequential floating forward selection method and hyperparameter tuning. The classification accuracy with respect to the biopsy reference was assessed by a group-k-fold cross-validation procedure, and the performance was evaluated by the Area Under the Receiver Operating Characteristics Curve (AUC). Of the 54 patients, 20 were found with clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa) based on SBx. The 18 hemodynamic parameters showed mean AUC values varying from 0.63 to 0.75, and SWE elasticity showed an AUC of 0.66. The multiparametric approach using radiomic features derived from hemodynamic parameters only produced an AUC of 0.81, while the combination of hemodynamic and tissue-stiffness quantifications yielded a significantly improved AUC of 0.85 for csPCa detection (p-value < 0.05) using the Gradient Boosting classifier. Our results suggest 3D multiparametric ultrasound imaging combining hemodynamic and tissue-stiffness features to represent a promising diagnostic tool for biopsy outcome prediction, aiding in csPCa localization.

Identifiants

pubmed: 38734528
pii: S0301-5629(24)00179-0
doi: 10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2024.04.007
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2024 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

Conflict of interest Prof. Massimo Mischi and Prof. Hessel Wijkstra are the advisors of the company Angiogenesis Analytics (the Netherlands).

Auteurs

Peiran Chen (P)

Department of Electrical Engineering, Eindhoven University of Technology, Eindhoven, Netherlands. Electronic address: p.chen1@tue.nl.

Simona Turco (S)

Department of Electrical Engineering, Eindhoven University of Technology, Eindhoven, Netherlands.

Yao Wang (Y)

Department of Ultrasound in Medicine, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China.

Auke Jager (A)

Department of Urology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Amsterdam, Netherlands.

Gautier Daures (G)

Angiogenesis Analytics, JADS Venture Campus, Netherlands.

Hessel Wijkstra (H)

Department of Electrical Engineering, Eindhoven University of Technology, Eindhoven, Netherlands; Department of Urology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Amsterdam, Netherlands.

Wim Zwart (W)

Angiogenesis Analytics, JADS Venture Campus, Netherlands.

Pintong Huang (P)

Department of Ultrasound in Medicine, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China.

Massimo Mischi (M)

Department of Electrical Engineering, Eindhoven University of Technology, Eindhoven, Netherlands.

Classifications MeSH