Highest fusion performance without harmful edge energy bursts in tokamak.


Journal

Nature communications
ISSN: 2041-1723
Titre abrégé: Nat Commun
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101528555

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
11 May 2024
Historique:
received: 25 10 2023
accepted: 29 04 2024
medline: 12 5 2024
pubmed: 12 5 2024
entrez: 11 5 2024
Statut: epublish

Résumé

The path of tokamak fusion and International thermonuclear experimental reactor (ITER) is maintaining high-performance plasma to produce sufficient fusion power. This effort is hindered by the transient energy burst arising from the instabilities at the boundary of plasmas. Conventional 3D magnetic perturbations used to suppress these instabilities often degrade fusion performance and increase the risk of other instabilities. This study presents an innovative 3D field optimization approach that leverages machine learning and real-time adaptability to overcome these challenges. Implemented in the DIII-D and KSTAR tokamaks, this method has consistently achieved reactor-relevant core confinement and the highest fusion performance without triggering damaging bursts. This is enabled by advances in the physics understanding of self-organized transport in the plasma edge and machine learning techniques to optimize the 3D field spectrum. The success of automated, real-time adaptive control of such complex systems paves the way for maximizing fusion efficiency in ITER and beyond while minimizing damage to device components.

Identifiants

pubmed: 38734685
doi: 10.1038/s41467-024-48415-w
pii: 10.1038/s41467-024-48415-w
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

3990

Subventions

Organisme : U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)
ID : DE-AC52-07NA27344
Organisme : U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)
ID : DE-SC0022270
Organisme : U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)
ID : DE-AC02-09CH11466
Organisme : U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)
ID : DE-SC0020372
Organisme : U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)
ID : DE-AC05-00OR22725
Organisme : U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)
ID : DE-FG02-99ER54531
Organisme : U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)
ID : DE-SC0022272
Organisme : U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)
ID : DE-SC0019352
Organisme : U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)
ID : DE-FC02-04ER54698
Organisme : U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)
ID : DE-SC0024527

Informations de copyright

© 2024. The Author(s).

Références

Gormezano, C. et al. Chapter 6: steady state operation. Nucl. Fusion 47, S285–S336 (2007).
doi: 10.1088/0029-5515/47/6/S06
Sips, A., Hobirk, J. & Peeters, A. G. Chapter 4: advanced tokamak studies in ASDEX upgrade. Fusion Sci. Technol. 44, 605–617 (2003).
doi: 10.13182/FST03-A402
Luce, T. C. et al. High performance stationary discharges in the DIII-D tokamak. Phys. Plasmas 11, 2627–2636 (2004).
doi: 10.1063/1.1704644
Joffrin, E. et al. The ‘hybrid’ scenario in JET: towards its validation for ITER. Nucl. Fusion 45, 626–634 (2005).
doi: 10.1088/0029-5515/45/7/010
Peeters, A., Angioni, C. & Sips, A. On the extrapolation to ITER of discharges in present tokamaks. Nucl. Fusion 47, 1341–1345 (2007).
doi: 10.1088/0029-5515/47/9/035
Sips, A. et al. Assessment of the baseline scenario at q
doi: 10.1088/1741-4326/aade57
Yushmanov, P. et al. Scalings for tokamak energy confinement. Nucl. Fusion 30, 1999–2006 (1990).
doi: 10.1088/0029-5515/30/10/001
Han, H. et al. A sustained high-temperature fusion plasma regime facilitated by fast ions. Nature 609, 269–275 (2022).
pubmed: 36071190 doi: 10.1038/s41586-022-05008-1
Wagner, F. et al. Development of an edge transport barrier at the H-mode transition of ASDEX. Phys. Rev. Lett. 53, 1453–1456 (1984).
doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.53.1453
Connor, J. W., Hastie, R. J., Wilson, H. R. & Miller, R. L. Magnetohydrodynamic stability of tokamak edge plasmas. Phys. Plasmas 5, 2687–2700 (1998).
doi: 10.1063/1.872956
Loarte, A. et al. Progress on the application of ELM control schemes to ITER scenarios from the non-active phase to DT operation. Nucl. Fusion 54, 033007 (2014).
doi: 10.1088/0029-5515/54/3/033007
Gunn, J. et al. Surface heat loads on the ITER divertor vertical targets. Nucl. Fusion 57, 046025 (2017).
doi: 10.1088/1741-4326/aa5e2a
Kamada, Y. et al. Disappearance of giant ELMs and appearance of minute grassy ELMs in JT-60U high-triangularity discharges. Plasma Phys. Controlled Fusion 42, A247–A253 (2000).
doi: 10.1088/0741-3335/42/5A/329
Stober, J. et al. Type II ELMy H modes on ASDEX Upgrade with good confinement at high density. Nucl. Fusion 41, 1123–1134 (2001).
doi: 10.1088/0029-5515/41/9/301
Maingi, R. et al. H-mode pedestal, ELM and power threshold studies in NSTX. Nucl. Fusion 45, 1066–1077 (2005).
doi: 10.1088/0029-5515/45/9/006
Viezzer, E. Access and sustainment of naturally ELM-free and small-ELM regimes. Nucl. Fusion 58, 115002 (2018).
doi: 10.1088/1741-4326/aac222
Ye, Y. et al. Experimental study on low recycling no-ELM high confinement mode in EAST. Nucl. Fusion 59, 086044 (2019).
doi: 10.1088/1741-4326/ab2806
Harrer, G. et al. Quasicontinuous exhaust scenario for a fusion reactor: the renaissance of small edge localized modes. Phys. Rev. Lett. 129, 165001 (2022).
pubmed: 36306746 doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.129.165001
Greenwald, M. et al. Studies of EDA H-mode in alcator C-Mod. Plasma Phys. Controlled Fusion 42, A263–A269 (2000).
doi: 10.1088/0741-3335/42/5A/331
Mossessian, D. A. et al. Edge dimensionless identity experiment on DIII-D and Alcator C -Mod. Phys. Plasmas 10, 689–698 (2003).
doi: 10.1063/1.1538252
Ryter, F. et al. H-mode power threshold and transition in ASDEX Upgrade. Plasma Phys. Controlled Fusion 40, 725–729 (1998).
doi: 10.1088/0741-3335/40/5/032
Whyte, D. et al. I-mode: an H-mode energy confinement regime with L-mode particle transport in Alcator C-Mod. Nucl. Fusion 50, 105005 (2010).
doi: 10.1088/0029-5515/50/10/105005
Greenfield, C. M. et al. Quiescent double barrier regime in the DIII-D tokamak. Phys. Rev. Lett. 86, 4544–4547 (2001).
pubmed: 11384279 doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.86.4544
Suttrop, W. et al. ELM-free stationary H-mode plasmas in the ASDEX upgrade tokamak. Plasma Phys. Controlled Fusion 45, 1399–1416 (2003).
doi: 10.1088/0741-3335/45/8/302
Evans, T. E. et al. Edge stability and transport control with resonant magnetic perturbations in collisionless tokamak plasmas. Nat. Phys. 2, 419–423 (2006).
doi: 10.1038/nphys312
Suttrop, W. et al. First observation of edge localized modes mitigation with resonant and nonresonant magnetic perturbations in ASDEX upgrade. Phys. Rev. Lett. 106, 225004 (2011).
pubmed: 21702608 doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.106.225004
Jeon, Y. M. et al. Suppression of edge localized modes in high-confinement KSTAR plasmas by nonaxisymmetric magnetic perturbations. Phys. Rev. Lett. 109, 035004 (2012).
pubmed: 22861864 doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.109.035004
Sun, Y. et al. Nonlinear transition from mitigation to suppression of the edge localized mode with resonant magnetic perturbations in the EAST tokamak. Phys. Rev. Lett. 117, 115001 (2016).
pubmed: 27661697 doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.117.115001
Fenstermacher, M. E. et al. Effect of island overlap on edge localized mode suppression by resonant magnetic perturbations in DIII-D. Phys. Plasmas 15, 056122 (2008).
doi: 10.1063/1.2901064
Rozhansky, V. et al. Modification of the edge transport barrier by resonant magnetic perturbations. Nucl. Fusion 50, 034005 (2010).
doi: 10.1088/0029-5515/50/3/034005
Nazikian, R. et al. Pedestal bifurcation and resonant field penetration at the threshold of edge-localized mode suppression in the DIII-D tokamak. Phys. Rev. Lett. 114, 105002 (2015).
pubmed: 25815938 doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.114.105002
Paz-Soldan, C. et al. Observation of a multimode plasma response and its relationship to density pumpout and edge-localized mode suppression. Phys. Rev. Lett. 114, 105001 (2015).
pubmed: 25815937 doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.114.105001
Hu, Q. M. et al. The density dependence of edge-localized-mode suppression and pump-out by resonant magnetic perturbations in the DIII-D tokamak. Phys. Plasmas 26, 120702 (2019).
doi: 10.1063/1.5134767
Fitzpatrick, R. Theory of edge localized mode suppression by static resonant magnetic perturbations in the DIII-D tokamak. Phys. Plasmas 27, 042506 (2020).
doi: 10.1063/5.0003117
Liu, Y., Paz-Soldan, C., Li, L. & Sun, Y. Role of 3D neoclassical particle flux in density pump-out during ELM control by RMP in DIII-D. Nucl. Fusion 60, 036018 (2020).
doi: 10.1088/1741-4326/ab6c35
Mordijck, S., Moyer, R. A. & McKee, G. R. Changes in density fluctuations as a result of resonant magnetic perturbations correlate with the density inverse scale length. Phys. Plasmas 19, 024504 (2012).
doi: 10.1063/1.3680641
McKee, G. et al. Increase of turbulence and transport with resonant magnetic perturbations in ELM-suppressed plasmas on DIII-D. Nucl. Fusion 53, 113011 (2013).
doi: 10.1088/0029-5515/53/11/113011
Müller, H. et al. Modification of scrape-off layer transport and turbulence by non-axisymmetric magnetic perturbations in ASDEX Upgrade. J. Nucl. Mater. 438, S64–S71 (2013).
doi: 10.1016/j.jnucmat.2013.01.010
Liu, S. et al. Edge turbulence characteristics and transport during the ELM mitigation with n = 1 resonant magnetic perturbation on EAST. Nucl. Fusion 60, 082001 (2020).
doi: 10.1088/1741-4326/ab77e5
Snyder, P. et al. Stability and dynamics of the edge pedestal in the low collisionality regime: physics mechanisms for steady-state ELM-free operation. Nucl. Fusion 47, 961–968 (2007).
doi: 10.1088/0029-5515/47/8/030
Laggner, F. et al. Real-time pedestal optimization and ELM control with 3D fields and gas flows on DIII-D. Nucl. Fusion 60, 076004 (2020).
doi: 10.1088/1741-4326/ab88e1
Shousha, R. et al. Design and experimental demonstration of feedback adaptive RMP ELM controller toward complete long pulse ELM suppression on KSTAR. Phys. Plasmas 29, 032514 (2022).
doi: 10.1063/5.0081928
Kates-Harbeck, J., Svyatkovskiy, A. & Tang, W. Predicting disruptive instabilities in controlled fusion plasmas through deep learning. Nature 568, 526–531 (2019).
pubmed: 30996348 doi: 10.1038/s41586-019-1116-4
Degrave, J. et al. Magnetic control of tokamak plasmas through deep reinforcement learning. Nature 602, 414–419 (2022).
pubmed: 35173339 pmcid: 8850200 doi: 10.1038/s41586-021-04301-9
Vega, J. et al. Disruption prediction with artificial intelligence techniques in tokamak plasmas. Nat. Phys. 18, 741–750 (2022).
doi: 10.1038/s41567-022-01602-2
Seo, J. et al. Avoiding fusion plasma tearing instability with deep reinforcement learning. Nature 626, 746–751 (2024).
pubmed: 38383624 pmcid: 10881383 doi: 10.1038/s41586-024-07024-9
Lehnen, M. et al. Plasma disruption management in ITER. Nucl. Fusion 26, 6–39 (2016).
Yang, S. et al. Tailoring resonant magnetic perturbation to optimize fast-ion confinement during ELM control in KSTAR. Nucl. Fusion 63, 126046 (2023).
doi: 10.1088/1741-4326/ad0161
Park, J.-K., Boozer, A. H. & Glasser, A. H. Computation of three-dimensional tokamak and spherical torus equilibria. Phys. Plasmas 14, 052110 (2007).
doi: 10.1063/1.2732170
Park, J.-K. et al. 3D field phase-space control in tokamak plasmas. Nat. Phys. 14, 1223–1228 (2018).
doi: 10.1038/s41567-018-0268-8
Park, J.-K. et al. Quasisymmetric optimization of nonaxisymmetry in tokamaks. Phys. Rev. Lett. 126, 125001 (2021).
pubmed: 33834790 doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.126.125001
Ferron, J. et al. Real time equilibrium reconstruction for tokamak discharge control. Nucl. Fusion 38, 1055–1066 (1998).
doi: 10.1088/0029-5515/38/7/308
Nazikian, R. et al. Advances in the understanding of ELM suppression by resonant magnetic perturbations (RMPs) in DIII-D and implications for ITER. In Proc. 25th IAEA Fusion Energy Conference https://www.osti.gov/biblio/1182663 (2014).
Suttrop, W. et al. Experimental studies of high-confinement mode plasma response to non-axisymmetric magnetic perturbations in ASDEX upgrade. Plasma Phys. Controlled Fusion 59, 014049 (2016).
doi: 10.1088/0741-3335/59/1/014049
Kim, M. et al. Pedestal electron collisionality and toroidal rotation during ELM-crash suppression phase under n = 1 RMP in KSTAR. Phys. Plasmas 27, 112501 (2020).
doi: 10.1063/5.0024055
Paz-Soldan, C. Plasma performance and operational space without ELMs in DIII-D. Plasma Phys. Controlled Fusion 63, 083001 (2021).
doi: 10.1088/1361-6587/ac048b
Yang, S. et al. Localizing resonant magnetic perturbations for edge localized mode control in KSTAR. Nucl. Fusion 60, 096023 (2020).
doi: 10.1088/1741-4326/aba1cf
Park, J.-K. a. et al. Progress towards ELM-less H-mode operations in KSTAR long pulses with resonant magnetic perturbations. In Proc. 29th IAEA Fusion Energy Conference https://conferences.iaea.org/event/316/contributions/28414/ (2023).
Eich, T. et al. ELM divertor peak energy fluence scaling to ITER with data from JET, MAST and ASDEX upgrade. Nucl. Mater. Energy 12, 84–90 (2017).
doi: 10.1016/j.nme.2017.04.014
Evans, T. E., the DIII-D Team. Suppression and mitigation of edge localized modes in the DIII-D tokamak with 3D magnetic perturbations. Plasma Fusion Res. 7, 2402046–2402046 (2012).
doi: 10.1585/pfr.7.2402046
Shin, G. et al. Preemptive RMP-driven ELM crash suppression automated by a real-time machine-learning classifier in KSTAR. Nucl. Fusion 62, 026035 (2022).
doi: 10.1088/1741-4326/ac412d
ITER Physics Expert Group on Confinement and Transport. Chapter 2: plasma confinement and transport. Nucl. Fusion 39, 2175–2249 (1999).
doi: 10.1088/0029-5515/39/12/302
Suttrop, W. et al. Experimental conditions to suppress edge localised modes by magnetic perturbations in the ASDEX upgrade tokamak. Nucl. Fusion 58, 096031 (2018).
doi: 10.1088/1741-4326/aace93
Hu, Q. et al. Wide operational windows of edge-localized mode suppression by resonant magnetic perturbations in the DIII-D tokamak. Phys. Rev. Lett. 125, 045001 (2020).
pubmed: 32794790 doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.125.045001
Hu, Q. M. et al. Predicting operational windows of ELMs suppression by resonant magnetic perturbations in the DIII-D and KSTAR tokamaks. Phys. Plasmas 28, 052505 (2021).
doi: 10.1063/5.0043018
Kim, S. et al. Optimization of 3D controlled ELM-free state with recovered global confinement for KSTAR with n = 1 resonant magnetic field perturbation. Nucl. Fusion 62, 026043 (2022).
doi: 10.1088/1741-4326/ac4369
Logan, N. C., Park, J.-K., Kim, K., Wang, Z. & Berkery, J. W. Neoclassical toroidal viscosity in perturbed equilibria with general tokamak geometry. Phys. Plasmas 20, 122507 (2013).
doi: 10.1063/1.4849395
Park, J.-K. & Logan, N. C. Self-consistent perturbed equilibrium with neoclassical toroidal torque in tokamaks. Phys. Plasmas 24, 032505 (2017).
doi: 10.1063/1.4977898
Kim, M. et al. Integrated RMP-based ELM-crash-control process for plasma performance enhancement during ELM crash suppression in KSTAR. Nucl. Fusion 63, 086032 (2023).
doi: 10.1088/1741-4326/ace460
Paz-Soldan, C. et al. The effect of plasma shape and neutral beam mix on the rotation threshold for RMP-ELM suppression. Nucl. Fusion 59, 056012 (2019).
doi: 10.1088/1741-4326/ab04c0
Evans, T. et al. 3D vacuum magnetic field modelling of the ITER ELM control coil during standard operating scenarios. Nucl. Fusion 53, 093029 (2013).
doi: 10.1088/0029-5515/53/9/093029
Pütterich, T. et al. Calculation and experimental test of the cooling factor of tungsten. Nucl. Fusion 50, 025012 (2010).
doi: 10.1088/0029-5515/50/2/025012
Chang, Y. et al. Tungsten transport due to the neoclassical toroidal viscosity induced by resonant magnetic perturbation in the EAST tokamak. Phys. Plasmas 30, 122301 (2023).
doi: 10.1063/5.0165669
Järvinen, A. et al. Simulations of tungsten transport in the edge of JET ELMy H-mode plasmas. J. Nucl. Mater. 438, S1005–S1009 (2013).
doi: 10.1016/j.jnucmat.2013.01.219
Kirschner, A. et al. Modelling of tungsten erosion and deposition in the divertor of JET-ILW in comparison to experimental findings. Nucl. Mater. Energy 18, 239–244 (2019).
doi: 10.1016/j.nme.2019.01.004
Dux, R., Loarte, A., Fable, E. & Kukushkin, A. Transport of tungsten in the H-mode edge transport barrier of ITER. Plasma Phys. Controlled Fusion 56, 124003 (2014).
doi: 10.1088/0741-3335/56/12/124003
Shousha, R. et al. Closed loop RMP ELM suppression with minimized confinement degradation using adaptive control demonstrated. In Proc. 29th IAEA Fusion Energy Conference https://conferences.iaea.org/event/316/contributions/27821/ (2023).
Leonard, A. et al. Effects of applied error fields on the H-mode power threshold of JFT-2M. Nucl. Fusion 31, 1511–1518 (1991).
doi: 10.1088/0029-5515/31/8/008
Kaye, S. et al. L–H threshold studies in NSTX. Nucl. Fusion 51, 113019 (2011).
doi: 10.1088/0029-5515/51/11/113019
Gohil, P. et al. L–H transition studies on DIII-D to determine H-mode access for operational scenarios in ITER. Nucl. Fusion 51, 103020 (2011).
doi: 10.1088/0029-5515/51/10/103020
Ryter, F. et al. L–H transition in the presence of magnetic perturbations in ASDEX Upgrade. Nucl. Fusion 52, 114014 (2012).
doi: 10.1088/0029-5515/52/11/114014
In, Y. et al. Enhanced understanding of non-axisymmetric intrinsic and controlled field impacts in tokamaks. Nucl. Fusion 57, 116054 (2017).
doi: 10.1088/1741-4326/aa791c
Schmitz, L. et al. L–H transition trigger physics in ITER-similar plasmas with applied n = 3 magnetic perturbations. Nucl. Fusion 59, 126010 (2019).
doi: 10.1088/1741-4326/ab36bf
Seraydarian, R. P. & Burrell, K. H. Multichordal charge-exchange recombination spectroscopy on the DIII-D tokamak. Rev. Sci. Instrum. 57, 2012–2014 (1986).
doi: 10.1063/1.1138774
Ko, W., Oh, S. & Kwon, M. KSTAR charge exchange spectroscopy system. IEEE Trans. Plasma Sci. 38, 996–1000 (2010).
doi: 10.1109/TPS.2010.2042182
Carlstrom, T. N. et al. Design and operation of the multipulse Thomson scattering diagnostic on DIII-D (invited). Rev. Sci. Instrum. 63, 4901–4906 (1992).
doi: 10.1063/1.1143545
Eldon, D. et al. Initial results of the high resolution edge Thomson scattering upgrade at DIII-D. Rev. Sci. Instrum. 83, 10E343 (2012).
pubmed: 23127000 doi: 10.1063/1.4738656
Lee, K. et al. The design of two color interferometer system for the 3-dimensional analysis of plasma density evolution on KSTAR. Fusion Eng. Des. 113, 87–91 (2016).
doi: 10.1016/j.fusengdes.2016.10.008
Lao, L., St. John, H., Stambaugh, R., Kellman, A. & Pfeiffer, W. Reconstruction of current profile parameters and plasma shapes in tokamaks. Nucl. Fusion 25, 1611–1622 (1985).
doi: 10.1088/0029-5515/25/11/007
Logan, N. C. et al. OMFIT tokamak profile data fitting and physics analysis. Fusion Sci. Technol. 74, 125–134 (2018).
doi: 10.1080/15361055.2017.1386943
Meneghini, O. et al. Integrated modeling applications for tokamak experiments with OMFIT. Nucl. Fusion 55, 083008 (2015).
doi: 10.1088/0029-5515/55/8/083008
Hillesheim, J. C. et al. A multichannel, frequency-modulated, tunable Doppler backscattering and reflectometry system. Rev. Sci. Instrum. 80, 083507 (2009).
pubmed: 19725655 doi: 10.1063/1.3205449

Auteurs

S K Kim (SK)

Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory, Princeton, NJ, USA.

R Shousha (R)

Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory, Princeton, NJ, USA.

S M Yang (SM)

Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory, Princeton, NJ, USA.

Q Hu (Q)

Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory, Princeton, NJ, USA.

S H Hahn (SH)

Korea Institute of Fusion Energy, Daejeon, South Korea.

A Jalalvand (A)

Princeton University, Princeton, NJ, USA.

J-K Park (JK)

Seoul National University, Seoul, South Korea.

N C Logan (NC)

Columbia University, New York, NY, USA.

A O Nelson (AO)

Columbia University, New York, NY, USA.

Y-S Na (YS)

Seoul National University, Seoul, South Korea.

R Nazikian (R)

General Atomics, San Diego, CA, USA.

R Wilcox (R)

Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, TN, USA.

R Hong (R)

University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA.

T Rhodes (T)

University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA.

C Paz-Soldan (C)

Columbia University, New York, NY, USA.

Y M Jeon (YM)

Korea Institute of Fusion Energy, Daejeon, South Korea.

M W Kim (MW)

Korea Institute of Fusion Energy, Daejeon, South Korea.

W H Ko (WH)

Korea Institute of Fusion Energy, Daejeon, South Korea.

J H Lee (JH)

Korea Institute of Fusion Energy, Daejeon, South Korea.

A Battey (A)

Columbia University, New York, NY, USA.

G Yu (G)

University of California Davis, Davis, CA, USA.

A Bortolon (A)

Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory, Princeton, NJ, USA.

J Snipes (J)

Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory, Princeton, NJ, USA.

E Kolemen (E)

Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory, Princeton, NJ, USA. ekolemen@princeton.edu.
Princeton University, Princeton, NJ, USA. ekolemen@princeton.edu.

Classifications MeSH