Contemporary guideline-directed medical therapy in de novo, chronic, and worsening heart failure patients: First data from the TITRATE-HF study.
Guideline‐directed medical therapy
Implementation
Pharmacotherapy
Registry
Sequencing
Titration
Journal
European journal of heart failure
ISSN: 1879-0844
Titre abrégé: Eur J Heart Fail
Pays: England
ID NLM: 100887595
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
12 May 2024
12 May 2024
Historique:
revised:
19
04
2024
received:
05
04
2024
accepted:
23
04
2024
medline:
12
5
2024
pubmed:
12
5
2024
entrez:
12
5
2024
Statut:
aheadofprint
Résumé
Despite clear guideline recommendations for initiating four drug classes in all patients with heart failure (HF) with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) and the availability of rapid titration schemes, information on real-world implementation lags behind. Closely following the 2021 ESC HF guidelines and 2023 focused update, the TITRATE-HF study started to prospectively investigate the use, sequencing, and titration of guideline-directed medical therapy (GDMT) in HF patients, including the identification of implementation barriers. TITRATE-HF is an ongoing long-term HF registry conducted in the Netherlands. Overall, 4288 patients from 48 hospitals were included. Among these patients, 1732 presented with de novo, 2240 with chronic, and 316 with worsening HF. The median age was 71 years (interquartile range [IQR] 63-78), 29% were female, and median ejection fraction was 35% (IQR 25-40). In total, 44% of chronic and worsening HFrEF patients were prescribed quadruple therapy. However, only 1% of HFrEF patients achieved target dose for all drug classes. In addition, quadruple therapy was more often prescribed to patients treated in a dedicated HF outpatient clinic as compared to a general cardiology outpatient clinic. In each GDMT drug class, 19% to 36% of non-use in HFrEF patients was related to side-effects, intolerances, or contraindications. In the de novo HF cohort, 49% of patients already used one or more GDMT drug classes for other indications than HF. This first analysis of the TITRATE-HF study reports relatively high use of GDMT in a contemporary HF cohort, while still showing room for improvement regarding quadruple therapy. Importantly, the use and dose of GDMT were suboptimal, with the reasons often remaining unclear. This underscores the urgency for further optimization of GDMT and implementation strategies within HF management.
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Subventions
Organisme : ICIN Netherlands Heart Institute
Informations de copyright
© 2024 The Authors. European Journal of Heart Failure published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of European Society of Cardiology.
Références
McDonagh TA, Metra M, Adamo M, Gardner RS, Baumbach A, Bohm M, et al.; ESC Scientific Document Group. 2021 ESC Guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of acute and chronic heart failure: Developed by the Task Force for the diagnosis and treatment of acute and chronic heart failure of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC). With the special contribution of the Heart Failure Association (HFA) of the ESC. Eur J Heart Fail 2022;24:4–131. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejhf.2333
McDonagh TA, Metra M, Adamo M, Gardner RS, Baumbach A, Böhm M, et al.; ESC Scientific Document Group. 2023 Focused Update of the 2021 ESC Guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of acute and chronic heart failure: Developed by the task force for the diagnosis and treatment of acute and chronic heart failure of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC). With the special contribution of the Heart Failure Association (HFA) of the ESC. Eur J Heart Fail 2024;26:5–17. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejhf.3024
Mebazaa A, Davison B, Chioncel O, Cohen‐Solal A, Diaz R, Filippatos G, et al. Safety, tolerability and efficacy of up‐titration of guideline‐directed medical therapies for acute heart failure (STRONG‐HF): A multinational, open‐label, randomised, trial. Lancet 2022;400:1938–1952. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140‐6736(22)02076‐1
Brunner‐La Rocca HP, Linssen GC, Smeele FJ, van Drimmelen AA, Schaafsma HJ, Westendorp PH, et al.; CHECK‐HF Investigators. Contemporary drug treatment of chronic heart failure with reduced ejection fraction: The CHECK‐HF registry. JACC Heart Fail 2019;7:13–21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jchf.2018.10.010
Greene SJ, Butler J, Albert NM, DeVore AD, Sharma PP, Duffy CI, et al. Medical therapy for heart failure with reduced ejection fraction: The CHAMP‐HF registry. J Am Coll Cardiol 2018;72:351–366. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2018.04.070
Teng TK, Tromp J, Tay WT, Anand I, Ouwerkerk W, Chopra V, et al. Prescribing patterns of evidence‐based heart failure pharmacotherapy and outcomes in the ASIAN‐HF registry: A cohort study. Lancet Glob Health 2018;6:e1008–e1018. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2214‐109X(18)30306‐1
Savarese G, Kishi T, Vardeny O, Adamsson Eryd S, Bodegård J, Lund LH, et al. Heart failure drug treatment‐inertia, titration, and discontinuation: A multinational observational study (EVOLUTION HF). JACC Heart Fail 2023;11:1–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jchf.2022.08.009
D'Amario D, Rodolico D, Rosano GMC, Dahlstrom U, Crea F, Lund LH, et al. Association between dosing and combination use of medications and outcomes in heart failure with reduced ejection fraction: Data from the Swedish Heart Failure Registry. Eur J Heart Fail 2022;24:871–884. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejhf.2477
Malgie J, Clephas PRD, Brunner‐La Rocca HP, de Boer RA, Brugts JJ. Guideline‐directed medical therapy for HFrEF: Sequencing strategies and barriers for life‐saving drug therapy. Heart Fail Rev 2023;28:1221–1234. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10741‐023‐10325‐2
Clephas PRD, Malgie J, Schaap J, Koudstaal S, Emans M, Linssen GCM, et al. Guideline implementation, drug sequencing, and quality of care in heart failure: Design and rationale of TITRATE‐HF. ESC Heart Fail 2024;11:550–559. https://doi.org/10.1002/ehf2.14604
Herdman M, Gudex C, Lloyd A, Janssen M, Kind P, Parkin D, et al. Development and preliminary testing of the new five‐level version of EQ‐5D (EQ‐5D‐5L). Qual Life Res 2011;20:1727–1736. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136‐011‐9903‐x
Jonsson Å, Orwelius L, Dahlstrom U, Kristenson M. Evaluation of the usefulness of EQ‐5D as a patient‐reported outcome measure using the Paretian classification of health change among patients with chronic heart failure. J Patient Rep Outcomes 2020;4:50. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41687‐020‐00216‐7
Versteegh MM, Vermeulen KM, Evers SMAA, De Wit GA, Prenger R, Stolk EA. Dutch tariff for the five‐level version of EQ‐5D. Value Health 2016;19:343–352. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jval.2016.01.003
McMurray JJV, Packer M, Desai AS, Gong J, Lefkowitz MP, Rizkala AR, et al.; PARADIGM‐HF Investigators and Committees. Angiotensin‐neprilysin inhibition versus enalapril in heart failure. N Engl J Med 2014;371:993–1004. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1409077
McMurray JJV, Solomon SD, Inzucchi SE, Køber L, Kosiborod MN, Martinez FA, et al.; DAPA‐HF Trial Committees and Investigators. Dapagliflozin in patients with heart failure and reduced ejection fraction. N Engl J Med 2019;381:1995–2008. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1911303
Packer M, Anker SD, Butler J, Filippatos G, Pocock SJ, Carson P, et al.; EMPEROR‐Reduced Trial Investigators. Cardiovascular and renal outcomes with empagliflozin in heart failure. N Engl J Med 2020;383:1413–1424. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa2022190
Greene SJ, Felker GM. The urgency of doing: Addressing gaps in use of evidence‐based medical therapy for heart failure. JACC Heart Fail 2019;7:22–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jchf.2018.11.006
Lund LH, Carrero JJ, Farahmand B, Henriksson KM, Jonsson Å, Jernberg T, et al. Association between enrolment in a heart failure quality registry and subsequent mortality – a nationwide cohort study. Eur J Heart Fail 2017;19:1107–1116. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejhf.762
Sherrod CF, Farr SL, Sauer AJ. Overcoming treatment inertia for patients with heart failure: How do we build systems that move us from rest to motion? Eur Heart J 2023;44:1970–1972. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehad169
FitzGerald RJ. Medication errors: The importance of an accurate drug history. Br J Clin Pharmacol 2009;67:671–675. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365‐2125.2009.03424.x
Verhestraeten C, Heggermont WA, Maris M. Clinical inertia in the treatment of heart failure: A major issue to tackle. Heart Fail Rev 2021;26:1359–1370. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10741‐020‐09979‐z
Bozkurt B, Coats AJS, Tsutsui H, Abdelhamid CM, Adamopoulos S, Albert N, et al. Universal definition and classification of heart failure: A report of the Heart Failure Society of America, Heart Failure Association of the European Society of Cardiology, Japanese Heart Failure Society and Writing Committee of the Universal Definition of Heart Failure: Endorsed by the Canadian Heart Failure Society, Heart Failure Association of India, Cardiac Society of Australia and New Zealand, and Chinese Heart Failure Association. Eur J Heart Fail 2021;23:352–380. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejhf.2115
Peterson PN, Rumsfeld JS, Liang L, Hernandez AF, Peterson ED, Fonarow GC, et al. Treatment and risk in heart failure: Gaps in evidence or quality? Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes 2010;3:309–315. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.109.879478
Greene SJ, DeVore AD. The maximally tolerated dose: The key context for interpreting subtarget medication dosing for heart failure. JACC Heart Fail 2020;8:739–741. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jchf.2020.05.011
Veenis JF, Brunner‐La Rocca HP, Linssen GCM, Van Gent MWF, Hoes AW, Brugts JJ; CHECK‐HF Investigators. Treatment differences in chronic heart failure patients with reduced ejection fraction according to blood pressure. Circ Heart Fail 2020;13:e006667. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCHEARTFAILURE.119.006667