Translation, cross-cultural adaptation, and validation of the Duke Activity Status Index (DASI) to Sinhala language.
DASI
Physical activity
Pre-operative
Sinhala
Sri Lanka
Journal
Perioperative medicine (London, England)
ISSN: 2047-0525
Titre abrégé: Perioper Med (Lond)
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101609072
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
13 May 2024
13 May 2024
Historique:
received:
18
01
2024
accepted:
10
04
2024
medline:
13
5
2024
pubmed:
13
5
2024
entrez:
12
5
2024
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Duke Activity Status Index (DASI) is a widely used tool to assess functional capacity among patients, but there is no Sinhala version validated for patients in Sri Lanka. This study aimed to cross-culturally adapt and test the validity and reliability of the Sinhala version of DASI (DASI-S). The translation and cross-cultural adaptation of the DASI questionnaire were conducted following the standard guidelines. It was pre-tested on ten pre-operative patients and further modified. The construct validity and reliability of DASI-S were evaluated by administering the modified final DASI-S, which comprised 12 items, along with the physical functioning sub-scale of the 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36), consisting of 10 items to eighty-one patients who were awaiting non-cardiac surgeries at university surgical wards, National Hospital of Sri Lanka (NHSL), and Colombo North Teaching Hospital (CNTH), Sri Lanka. Reliability was assessed through Cronbach alpha, while the validity was evaluated using factor analysis and Spearman's correlation. The ethical approval was obtained from the Ethics Review Committee, Faculty of Medicine, University of Colombo, Sri Lanka. The mean age of the participants was 46.2 (± 16.6) years and the majority were females (54.3%). The mean height, weight, and body mass index of the sample were 160.5 (± 9.6) cm, 60.3 (± 11.9) kg, and 23.4 (± 4.5) kgm Sinhala version of the DASI appears to be a valid, reliable and easy-to-administer tool to assess functional capacity among patients who are awaiting non-cardiac surgeries.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Duke Activity Status Index (DASI) is a widely used tool to assess functional capacity among patients, but there is no Sinhala version validated for patients in Sri Lanka. This study aimed to cross-culturally adapt and test the validity and reliability of the Sinhala version of DASI (DASI-S).
METHODS
METHODS
The translation and cross-cultural adaptation of the DASI questionnaire were conducted following the standard guidelines. It was pre-tested on ten pre-operative patients and further modified. The construct validity and reliability of DASI-S were evaluated by administering the modified final DASI-S, which comprised 12 items, along with the physical functioning sub-scale of the 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36), consisting of 10 items to eighty-one patients who were awaiting non-cardiac surgeries at university surgical wards, National Hospital of Sri Lanka (NHSL), and Colombo North Teaching Hospital (CNTH), Sri Lanka. Reliability was assessed through Cronbach alpha, while the validity was evaluated using factor analysis and Spearman's correlation. The ethical approval was obtained from the Ethics Review Committee, Faculty of Medicine, University of Colombo, Sri Lanka.
RESULTS
RESULTS
The mean age of the participants was 46.2 (± 16.6) years and the majority were females (54.3%). The mean height, weight, and body mass index of the sample were 160.5 (± 9.6) cm, 60.3 (± 11.9) kg, and 23.4 (± 4.5) kgm
CONCLUSIONS
CONCLUSIONS
Sinhala version of the DASI appears to be a valid, reliable and easy-to-administer tool to assess functional capacity among patients who are awaiting non-cardiac surgeries.
Identifiants
pubmed: 38735972
doi: 10.1186/s13741-024-00386-8
pii: 10.1186/s13741-024-00386-8
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
38Informations de copyright
© 2024. The Author(s).
Références
Akoglu H. User’s guide to correlation coefficients. Turk J Emerg Med. 2018;18(3):91–3.
doi: 10.1016/j.tjem.2018.08.001
pubmed: 30191186
pmcid: 6107969
Alonso J, Permanyer-Miralda G, Cascant P, Brotons C, Prieto L, Soler-Soler J. Measuring functional status of chronic coronary patients: reliability, validity and responsiveness to clinical change of the reduced version of the Duke Activity Status Index (DASI). Eur Heart J. 1997;18(3):414–9.
doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.eurheartj.a015260
pubmed: 9076377
Beaton DE, Bombardier C, Guillemin F, Ferraz MB. Guidelines for the process of cross-cultural adaptation of self-report measures. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2000;25(24):3186–91.
doi: 10.1097/00007632-200012150-00014
pubmed: 11124735
Boulkedid R, Abdoul H, Loustau M, Sibony O, Alberti C. Using and reporting the Delphi method for selecting healthcare quality indicators: a systematic review. PLoS One. 2011;6(6):e20476.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0020476
pubmed: 21694759
pmcid: 3111406
Brazier JE, Harper R, Jones NM, O’Cathain A, Thomas KJ, Usherwood T, et al. Validating the SF-36 health survey questionnaire: new outcome measure for primary care. BMJ. 1992;305(6846):160–4.
doi: 10.1136/bmj.305.6846.160
pubmed: 1285753
pmcid: 1883187
Costa HS, Lima MMO, de Sousa GR, de Souza AC, Alencar MCN, Nunes MCP, et al. Functional capacity and risk stratification by the Six-minute Walk Test in Chagas heart disease: Comparison with Cardiopulmonary Exercise Testing. Int J Cardiol. 2014;177(2):661–3.
doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2014.09.172
pubmed: 25449475
Coutinho-Myrrha MA, Dias RC, Fernandes AA, Araújo CG, Hlatky MA, Pereira DG, et al. Duke Activity Status Index for cardiovascular diseases: validation of the Portuguese translation. Arq Bras Cardiol. 2014;102(4):383–90.
pubmed: 24652056
pmcid: 4028943
Duckett S, Jorm C, Danks L, Moran G. All complications should count: Using our data to make hospitals safer. Grattan Institute. 2018;3–4. ISBN: 978-0-6482307-1-7.
El-Kefraoui C, Rajabiyazdi F, Pecorelli N, Carli F, Lee L, Feldman LS, et al. Prognostic value of the Duke Activity Status Index (DASI) in patients undergoing colorectal surgery. World J Surg. 2021;45(12):3677–85.
doi: 10.1007/s00268-021-06256-4
pubmed: 34448918
Govil N, Parag K, Kumar B, Khandelwal H, Dua R, Sivaji P. Translation, cultural adaptation, and validation of the duke activity status index in the hindi language. Ann Card Anaesth. 2020;23(3):315–20.
doi: 10.4103/0971-9784.282667
pubmed: 32687089
pmcid: 7559948
Gunawardena NS, Seneviratne R de A, Atauda TA. An approach to validation of a multi-dimensional tool. J Coll Community Physicians of Sri Lanka. 2003;8:18–26.
doi: 10.4038/jccpsl.v8i1.8302
Hlatky MA, Boineau RE, Higginbotham MB, Lee KL, Mark DB, Califf RM, et al. A brief self-administered questionnaire to determine functional capacity (The Duke Activity Status Index). Am J Cardiol. 1989;64(10):651–4.
doi: 10.1016/0002-9149(89)90496-7
pubmed: 2782256
Khuri SF, Henderson WG, DePalma RG, Mosca C, Healey NA, Kumbhani DJ. Determinants of long-term survival after major surgery and the adverse effect of postoperative complications. Ann Surg. 2005;242(3):326–43.
doi: 10.1097/01.sla.0000179621.33268.83
pubmed: 16135919
pmcid: 1357741
Lai CW, Hosie KB. Assessing perioperative risk and fitness in patients undergoing elective major non-cardiac surgery. Sri Lanka Journal of Surgery. 2012;30(1):1.
doi: 10.4038/sljs.v30i1.4497
Levett DZH, Jack S, Swart M, Carlisle J, Wilson J, Snowden C, et al. Perioperative cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET): consensus clinical guidelines on indications, organization, conduct, and physiological interpretation. Br J Anaesth. 2018;120(3):484–500.
doi: 10.1016/j.bja.2017.10.020
pubmed: 29452805
Mustafaoglu R, Demir R, Aslan GK, Sinan UY, Zeren M, Yildiz A, Kucukoglu MS. Translation, cross-cultural adaptation, reliability, and validity of the Turkish version of the Duke Activity Status Index in patients with pulmonary hypertension. Pulmonology. 2023;29(Suppl 4):S18–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pulmoe.2021.06.008 .
Nepogodiev D, Martin J, Biccard B, Makupe A, Bhangu A, Nepogodiev D, et al. Global burden of postoperative death. The Lancet. 2019;393(10170):401.
doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)33139-8
Neves LMT, Alberto KN, Arenas FP, Luis Vicente Franco de O, Arena R, Cipriano Junior G. Translation and cross-cultural adaptation of the Duke activity status index to Brazilian Portuguese. Fisioterapia em Movimento. 2013;26(3):631–8.
doi: 10.1590/S0103-51502013000300017
Palladino R, Tayu Lee J, Ashworth M, Triassi M, Millett C. Associations between multimorbidity, healthcare utilisation and health status: evidence from 16 European countries. Age Ageing. 2016;45(3):431–5.
doi: 10.1093/ageing/afw044
pubmed: 27013499
pmcid: 4846796
Park HA, Park SH, Cho SI, Jang YJ, Kim JH, Park SS, et al. Impact of age and comorbidity on the short-term surgical outcome after laparoscopy-assisted distal gastrectomy for adenocarcinoma. Am Surg. 2013;79(1):40–8.
doi: 10.1177/000313481307900123
pubmed: 23317604
Riedel B, Li MHG, Lee CHA, Ismail H, Cuthbertson BH, Wijeysundera DN, et al. A simplified (modified) Duke Activity Status Index (M-DASI) to characterise functional capacity: a secondary analysis of the Measurement of Exercise Tolerance before Surgery (METS) study. Br J Anaesth. 2021;126(1):181–90.
doi: 10.1016/j.bja.2020.06.016
pubmed: 32690247
Tsang S, Royse C, Terkawi A. Guidelines for developing, translating, and validating a questionnaire in perioperative and pain medicine. Saudi J Anaesth. 2017;11(5):80.
doi: 10.4103/sja.SJA_203_17
Tsang S, Royse CF, Terkawi AS. Guidelines for developing, translating, and validating a questionnaire in perioperative and pain medicine. Saudi J Anaesth. 2017;11(Suppl 1):S80–9.
doi: 10.4103/sja.SJA_203_17
pubmed: 28616007
pmcid: 5463570
Vaske JJ, Beaman J, Sponarski CC. Rethinking internal consistency in Cronbach’s alpha. Leis Sci. 2017;39(2):163–73.
doi: 10.1080/01490400.2015.1127189
Vibulchai N, Thanasilp S, Preechawong S, Broome ME. Validation of the Thai version of the Duke Activity Status Index in patients with a previous myocardial infarction. Asian Biomedicine. 2014;8(5):623–30.
doi: 10.5372/1905-7415.0805.336
Ware JE. SF-36 health survey update. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2000;25(24):3130–9.
doi: 10.1097/00007632-200012150-00008
pubmed: 11124729
Ware JE, Sherbourne CD. The MOS 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36) I Conceptual framework and item selection. Med Care. 1992;30(6):473–83.
doi: 10.1097/00005650-199206000-00002
pubmed: 1593914
Wijeysundera DN, Pearse RM, Shulman MA, Abbott TEF, Torres E, Croal BL, et al. Measurement of Exercise Tolerance before Surgery (METS) study: a protocol for an international multicentre prospective cohort study of cardiopulmonary exercise testing prior to major non-cardiac surgery. BMJ Open. 2016;6(3):e010359.
doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2015-010359
pubmed: 26969643
pmcid: 4800144