Is There a Relative Age Effect among the Most Successful Track and Field Athletes?
RAE
athletic events
senior athletes
youth athletes
Journal
Journal of human kinetics
ISSN: 1640-5544
Titre abrégé: J Hum Kinet
Pays: Poland
ID NLM: 101513031
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Apr 2024
Apr 2024
Historique:
received:
21
07
2023
accepted:
25
10
2023
medline:
13
5
2024
pubmed:
13
5
2024
entrez:
13
5
2024
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
The prevalence of the Relative Age Effect (RAE) was studied among medalists from the World Athletics Championships at U18, U20 and Senior age groups and from the Olympic Games from 2000 to 2022. The specific events examined were the 100, 200, 400, 800, 1500, and 3000/5000 m, the long jump, the triple jump, the high jump and the pole vault. Dates of birth from 1,858 outdoor track and field athletes were analysed and further divided into four groups according to the quartile of birth. The RAE was found to be widespread among athletes of both sexes in U18 and U20 age groups in all examined disciplines. There was no difference between the most successful U18 and U20 athletes (p = 0.52). Among senior athletes of both sexes, this effect was not detected and the number of "late-born" athletes in this age group was higher than athletes born in the first three quarters. The prevalence of the RAE across the four groups of events was found in U18 and U20 age groups. Additionally, within each age group, the difference among events was statistically significant. In most successful track and field athletes, the RAE is only significant in U18 and U20 age groups. In senior athletes, the number of "late-born" athletes is significant while RAE disappears. These data may be considered when assessing the athletic potential of an individual athlete.
Identifiants
pubmed: 38736604
doi: 10.5114/jhk/174497
pii: 174497
pmc: PMC11079924
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
193-202Informations de copyright
Copyright: © Academy of Physical Education in Katowice.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The authors declare no conflict of interest.