One-Year Outcomes of Transurethral Treatment of Bladder Neck Stenosis Following Transurethral Resection of the Prostate. Results from a Large, Multicenter Series.

bladder neck stenosis postoperative complications transurethral resection of the prostate urinary incontinence

Journal

International journal of general medicine
ISSN: 1178-7074
Titre abrégé: Int J Gen Med
Pays: New Zealand
ID NLM: 101515487

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
2024
Historique:
received: 13 01 2024
accepted: 01 05 2024
medline: 13 5 2024
pubmed: 13 5 2024
entrez: 13 5 2024
Statut: epublish

Résumé

To assess management and outcomes of bladder neck stenosis (BNS) post-transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) in 12 centers. A retrospective analysis of patients who underwent transurethral BN incision for stenosis following TURP from January 2015 and January 2023 was performed. Inclusion criteria included endoscopic diagnosis of BNS associated with obstruction and/or lower urinary tract symptoms. Data are presented as median and interquartile range. Two distinct univariable logistic regression analyses were performed to identify factors associated with overall urinary incontinence and recurrent stenosis. Three hundred and seventy-two men were included. 95.2% of patients developed BNS following bipolar TURP. 21.0% of patients were on an indwelling catheter before BNS incision. Bipolar electrocautery was the most commonly employed energy for incision (66.5%). Collings knife was the most commonly employed (61.2%) instrument for incision, followed by end-firing holmium lasering (35.3%). Median operation time was 30 (25-45) minutes. The overall complication rate was 12.4%, with 19 (5.1%) patients suffering from acute urinary retention, 6 (1.6%) patients requiring prolonged irrigation due to persistent hematuria, and a surgical hemostasis was necessary in 8 cases (2.2%). Overall postoperative incontinence rate was 17.2%, with urge incontinence accounting for the most common type (45.3%). Incontinence lasted more than 3 months in 9/46 (14.3%) patients. Recurrent BNS occurred in 29 (7.8%) patients and was managed by re-endoscopic incision in 21 (5.6%) patients and dilatation only in 6 (1.6%) patients. Two (0.5%) patients underwent urethroplasty for recalcitrant stenosis. Logistic regression analysis showed that Collings knife was associated with higher odds of having postoperative incontinence (OR 3.93 95% CI 1.45-11.13, p=0.008) and BN recurrence (OR 3.589 95% CI 1.157-15.7, p=0.047). Transurethral BN incision provides satisfactory short-term results with an acceptable rate of complications.

Identifiants

pubmed: 38736663
doi: 10.2147/IJGM.S459441
pii: 459441
pmc: PMC11088407
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

1967-1974

Informations de copyright

© 2024 Castellani et al.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

The authors report no conflicts of interest in this work.

Auteurs

Daniele Castellani (D)

Urology Unit, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria delle Marche, Università Politecnica delle Marche, Ancona, Italy.

Silvia Stramucci (S)

Urology Unit, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria delle Marche, Università Politecnica delle Marche, Ancona, Italy.

Bhavatej Enganti (B)

Department of Urology, Asian Institute of Nephrology and Urology, Hyderabad, India.

Jenni Lane (J)

Department of Urology, University Hospital Southampton NHS Trust, Southampton, UK.

Santosh Kumar (S)

Department Urology, Christian Medical College, Vellore, India.

Yiloren Tanidir (Y)

Unit of Urology, Marmara University, Pendik Research and Education Hospital, Istanbul.

Alba Farré (A)

Department of Urology, Fundació Puigvert, Autonomous University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.

Boyke Soebhali (B)

Department of Urology, Abdul Wahab Sjahranie Hospital Medical Faculty, Mulawarman University, Samarinda, Indonesia.

Vigen Malkhasyan (V)

Department of Urology, Pavlov First Saint Petersburg State Medical University, Saint Petersburg, Russian Federation.

Nariman Gadzhiev (N)

Department of Urology, Saint-Petersburg State University Hospital, Saint-Petersburg, Russian Federation.

Marek Adam Zawadzki (MA)

Urology Unit, St. Anna Hospital, Piaseczno, Poland.

Pankaj Nandkishore Maheshwari (PN)

Department of Urology, Fortis Hospital Mulund, Mumbai, India.

Khi Yung Fong (KY)

Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore.

Giacomo Maria Pirola (GM)

Urology Unit, San Giuseppe Hospital, Multimedica Group, Milan, Italy.

Angelo Naselli (A)

Urology Unit, San Giuseppe Hospital, Multimedica Group, Milan, Italy.

Apurva Anand (A)

Urology Unit, Kulkarni Reconstructive Urology Center, Pune, India.

Shreyas K Bhadranavar (SK)

Urology Unit, Kulkarni Reconstructive Urology Center, Pune, India.

Bhaskar K Somani (BK)

Department of Urology, University Hospital Southampton NHS Trust, Southampton, UK.

Andrea Benedetto Galosi (AB)

Urology Unit, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria delle Marche, Università Politecnica delle Marche, Ancona, Italy.

Vineet Gauhar (V)

Department of Urology, Ng Teng Fong Hospital, NUHS, Singapore, Singapore.

Classifications MeSH