Process evaluation of a complex, multilevel, multicomponent scheme for the prevention and control of non-communicable diseases in Tamil Nadu, India: A mixed-methods protocol.
Door-delivery of NCD drugs
Dr Joshua and I (Manickam) have worked together on this publication and contributed equally as shared first authorship
Makkalai thedi maruthuvam
Non-communicable diseases
Population based screening
Process evaluation
Sustainable developmental goals
Universal health coverage
Journal
MethodsX
ISSN: 2215-0161
Titre abrégé: MethodsX
Pays: Netherlands
ID NLM: 101639829
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Jun 2024
Jun 2024
Historique:
received:
23
12
2023
accepted:
29
04
2024
medline:
13
5
2024
pubmed:
13
5
2024
entrez:
13
5
2024
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Non-communicable diseases (NCDs) are the leading cause of morbidity and mortality in India, necessitating development of multilevel and multicomponent interventions. The process evaluation uses mixed methods (secondary data analysis, key informant interviews, in-depth interviews, conceptual content analysis of documents, facility-based survey and non-participant observation) to evaluate the implementation of the MTM scheme. The broad evaluation questions addressed the fidelity, contexts, mechanisms of impact and challenges encountered by the scheme using the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) framework. The specific evaluation questions addressed selected inputs and processes identified as critical to implementation by the stakeholders. The CFIR framework will guide the thematic analysis of the qualitative interviews to explore the adaptations and deviations introduced during implementation in various contexts. The quantitative data on the indicators developed for the specific evaluation questions will be cleaned and descriptively analysed.
Sections du résumé
Background
UNASSIGNED
Non-communicable diseases (NCDs) are the leading cause of morbidity and mortality in India, necessitating development of multilevel and multicomponent interventions.
Methods and analysis
UNASSIGNED
The process evaluation uses mixed methods (secondary data analysis, key informant interviews, in-depth interviews, conceptual content analysis of documents, facility-based survey and non-participant observation) to evaluate the implementation of the MTM scheme. The broad evaluation questions addressed the fidelity, contexts, mechanisms of impact and challenges encountered by the scheme using the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) framework. The specific evaluation questions addressed selected inputs and processes identified as critical to implementation by the stakeholders. The CFIR framework will guide the thematic analysis of the qualitative interviews to explore the adaptations and deviations introduced during implementation in various contexts. The quantitative data on the indicators developed for the specific evaluation questions will be cleaned and descriptively analysed.
Identifiants
pubmed: 38737485
doi: 10.1016/j.mex.2024.102739
pii: S2215-0161(24)00192-4
pmc: PMC11087990
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
102739Informations de copyright
© 2024 Published by Elsevier B.V.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.