Structural basis for the distinct roles of non-conserved Pro116 and conserved Tyr124 of BCH domain of yeast p50RhoGAP.


Journal

Cellular and molecular life sciences : CMLS
ISSN: 1420-9071
Titre abrégé: Cell Mol Life Sci
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 9705402

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
13 May 2024
Historique:
received: 25 10 2023
accepted: 11 04 2024
revised: 08 04 2024
medline: 14 5 2024
pubmed: 14 5 2024
entrez: 13 5 2024
Statut: epublish

Résumé

p50RhoGAP is a key protein that interacts with and downregulates the small GTPase RhoA. p50RhoGAP is a multifunctional protein containing the BNIP-2 and Cdc42GAP Homology (BCH) domain that facilitates protein-protein interactions and lipid binding and the GAP domain that regulates active RhoA population. We recently solved the structure of the BCH domain from yeast p50RhoGAP (

Identifiants

pubmed: 38740643
doi: 10.1007/s00018-024-05238-8
pii: 10.1007/s00018-024-05238-8
doi:

Substances chimiques

Proline 9DLQ4CIU6V
Tyrosine 42HK56048U
Saccharomyces cerevisiae Proteins 0
rhoA GTP-Binding Protein EC 3.6.5.2

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

216

Subventions

Organisme : Ministry of Education - Singapore
ID : R154-000-C07-114
Organisme : Ministry of Education - Singapore
ID : A-8000477-00-00
Organisme : Ministry of Education - Singapore
ID : AcRF Tier 3 Grant MOE 2016-T3-1-002

Informations de copyright

© 2024. The Author(s).

Références

Hubbard SR, Mohammadi M, Schlessinger J (1998) Autoregulatory mechanisms in protein-tyrosine kinases*. J Biol Chem 273(20):11987–11990
doi: 10.1074/jbc.273.20.11987 pubmed: 9575136
Bos J, Rehmann H, Wittinghofer A (2007) GEFs and GAPs: critical elements in the control of small G proteins. Cell Rev 129(3):865–877. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.200
doi: 10.1016/j.cell.200
Zandvakili I, Lin Y, Morris JC, Zheng Y (2017) Rho GTPases: anti-or pro-neoplastic targets? Oncogene 36(23):3213–3222. https://doi.org/10.1038/onc.2016.473
doi: 10.1038/onc.2016.473 pubmed: 27991930
Zhang B, Zheng Y (1998) Negative regulation of Rho family GTPases Cdc42 and Rac2 by homodimer formation. J Biol Chem 273(40):25728–25733. https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.273.40.25728
doi: 10.1074/jbc.273.40.25728 pubmed: 9748241
Zhou YT, Chew LL, Lin SC, Low BC (2010) The BNIP-2 and Cdc42GAP Homology (BCH) domain of p50RhoGAP/Cdc42GAP sequesters RhoA from inactivation by the adjacent GTPase-activating protein domain. Mol Biol Cell 21(18):3232–3246. https://doi.org/10.1091/mbc.E09-05-0408
doi: 10.1091/mbc.E09-05-0408 pubmed: 20660160 pmcid: 2938388
Zhou YT, Guy GR, Low BC (2005) BNIP-2 induces cell elongation and membrane protrusions by interacting with Cdc42 via a unique Cdc42-binding motif within its BNIP-2 and Cdc42GAP homology domain. Exp Cell Res 303(2):263–274. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.yexcr.2004.08.044
doi: 10.1016/j.yexcr.2004.08.044 pubmed: 15652341
Shang X, Zhou YT, Low BC (2003) Concerted regulation of cell dynamics by BNIP-2 and Cdc42GAP homology/Sec14p-like, Proline-rich, and GTPase-activating protein domains of a novel Rho GTPase-activating protein, BPGAP1. J Biol Chem 278(46):45903–45914. https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M304514200
doi: 10.1074/jbc.M304514200 pubmed: 12944407
Zhou YT, Guy GR, Low BC (2006) BNIP-Sα induces cell rounding and apoptosis by displacing p50RhoGAP and facilitating RhoA activation via its unique motifs in the BNIP-2 and Cdc42GAP homology domain. Oncogene 25(16):2393–2408. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.onc.1209274
doi: 10.1038/sj.onc.1209274 pubmed: 16331259
Soh UJK, Low BC (2008) BNIP2 extra long inhibits RhoA and cellular transformation by Lbc RhoGEF via its BCH domain. J Cell Sci 121(10):1739–1749. https://doi.org/10.1242/jcs.021774
doi: 10.1242/jcs.021774 pubmed: 18445682
Buschdorf JP, Li Chew L, Zhang B et al (2006) Brain-specific BNIP-2-homology protein caytaxin relocalises glutaminase to neurite terminals and reduces glutamate levels. J Cell Sci 119(16):3337–3350. https://doi.org/10.1242/jcs.03061
doi: 10.1242/jcs.03061 pubmed: 16899818
Sun J, Pan CQ, Chew TW, Liang F, Burmeister M, Low BC (2015) BNIP-H recruits the cholinergic machinery to neurite terminals to promote acetylcholine signaling and neuritogenesis. Dev Cell 34(5):555–568. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.devcel.2015.08.006
doi: 10.1016/j.devcel.2015.08.006 pubmed: 26343454
Pan M, Chew TW, Pei Wong DC et al (2020) BNIP-2 retards breast cancer cell migration by coupling microtubule-mediated GEF-H1 and RhoA activation. Sci Adv. https://doi.org/10.1126/SCIADV.AAZ1534
doi: 10.1126/SCIADV.AAZ1534 pubmed: 33328240 pmcid: 7744073
Wong DCP, Xiao J, Chew TW et al (2022) BNIP-2 activation of cellular contractility inactivates YAP for H9c2 cardiomyoblast differentiation. Adv Sci. https://doi.org/10.1002/ADVS.202202834
doi: 10.1002/ADVS.202202834
Wong DCP, Pan CQ, Er SY et al (2023) The scaffold RhoGAP protein ARHGAP8/BPGAP1 synchronizes Rac and Rho signaling to facilitate cell migration. Mol Biol Cell. https://doi.org/10.1091/MBC.E21-03-0099
doi: 10.1091/MBC.E21-03-0099 pubmed: 36598812 pmcid: 10011724
Pan CQ, Low BC (2012) Functional plasticity of the BNIP-2 and Cdc42GAP homology (BCH) domain in cell signaling and cell dynamics. FEBS Lett 586(17):2674–2691. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.febslet.2012.04.023
doi: 10.1016/j.febslet.2012.04.023 pubmed: 22710163
Lavoie H, Therrien M (2015) Regulation of RAF protein kinases in ERK signalling. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 16:281–298. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrm3979
doi: 10.1038/nrm3979 pubmed: 25907612
Das M, Wiley DJ, Medina S et al (2007) Regulation of cell diameter, For3p localization, and cell symmetry by fission yeast Rho-GAP Rga4p. Mol Biol Cell 18(6):2090–2101. https://doi.org/10.1091/mbc.E06-09-0883
doi: 10.1091/mbc.E06-09-0883 pubmed: 17377067 pmcid: 1877093
Li L, Tang Q, Nakamura T, SuhJung J-GHS (2016) Fine tuning of Rac1 and RhoA alters cuspal shapes by remolding the cellular geometry. Sci Rep. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep37828
doi: 10.1038/srep37828 pubmed: 28442790 pmcid: 5515987
Nunes KP, Rigsby CS (2010) RhoA/Rho-kinase and vascular diseases: what is the link? Cell Mol Life Sci. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00018-010-0460-1.RhoA/Rho-kinase
doi: 10.1007/s00018-010-0460-1.RhoA/Rho-kinase pubmed: 20668910 pmcid: 2996825
Ridley AJ (2013) RhoA, RhoB and RhoC have different roles in cancer cell migration. J Microsc 251(3):242–249. https://doi.org/10.1111/jmi.12025
doi: 10.1111/jmi.12025 pubmed: 23488932
Symons M, Settleman J (2000) Rho family GTPases: more than simple switches. Trends Cell Biol 10(10):415–419. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0962-8924(00)01832-8
doi: 10.1016/S0962-8924(00)01832-8 pubmed: 10998597
Kotting Carsten, Kallenbach Angela, Suveyzdis Yan, Wittinghofer Alfred, KG. (2008) The GAP arginine finger movement into the catalytic site of Ras increases the activation entropy. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 105(17):6260–6265
doi: 10.1073/pnas.0712095105 pubmed: 18434546 pmcid: 2359817
Ihara K, Muraguchi S, Kato M et al (1998) Crystal structure of human RhoA in a dominantly active form complexed with a GTP analogue. J Biol Chem 273(16):9656–9666. https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.273.16.9656
doi: 10.1074/jbc.273.16.9656 pubmed: 9545299
Sahai E, Marshall CJ (2002) RHO—GTPases and cancer. Nat Rev Cancer 2(2):133–142. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrc725
doi: 10.1038/nrc725 pubmed: 12635176
Milburn MV, Tong L, DeVos AM et al (1990) Molecular switch for signal transduction: structural differences between active and inactive forms of protooncogenic ras proteins. Science. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.2406906
doi: 10.1126/science.2406906 pubmed: 2406906
Schaefer A, Reinhard NR, Hordijk PL (2014) Toward understanding RhoGTPase specificity: structure, function and local activation. Small GTPases 5(2):1–11. https://doi.org/10.4161/21541248.2014.968004
doi: 10.4161/21541248.2014.968004
Roberts PJ, Mitin N, Keller PJ, Chenette EJ, Madigan JP, Currin RO, Cox AD, Oswald Wilson PK, Der CJ (2008) Rho Family GTPase modification and dependence on CAAX motif-signaled posttranslational modification *. J Biol Chem. https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M800882200
doi: 10.1074/jbc.M800882200 pubmed: 19004835 pmcid: 2586253
Prakash P, Gorfe AA (2017) Membrane orientation dynamics of lipid-modified small GTPases. Small GTPases. https://doi.org/10.1080/21541248.2016.1211067
doi: 10.1080/21541248.2016.1211067 pubmed: 27715448
Molnár G, Dagher MC, Geiszt M, Settleman J, Ligeti E (2001) Role of prenylation in the interaction of RHO-family small GTPases with GTPpase activating proteins. Biochemistry 40(35):10542–10549. https://doi.org/10.1021/bi011158e
doi: 10.1021/bi011158e pubmed: 11523996
Moskwa P, Lè Ne Paclet MH, Dagher MC, Bet Ligeti E (2005) Autoinhibition of p50 Rho GTPase-activating Protein (GAP) is released by prenylated small GTPases*. J Biol Chem. https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M412563200
doi: 10.1074/jbc.M412563200 pubmed: 15596440
Chichili VPR, Chew TW, Shankar S et al (2021) Structural basis for p50RhoGAP BCH domain–mediated regulation of Rho inactivation. Proc Natl Acad Sci 118(21):e2014242118. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2014242118
doi: 10.1073/pnas.2014242118 pubmed: 34006635 pmcid: 8166187
Bell D, Berchuck A, Birrer M et al (2011) Integrated genomic analyses of ovarian carcinoma. Nature 474(7353):609–615. https://doi.org/10.1038/NATURE10166
doi: 10.1038/NATURE10166
Gupta AB, Wee LE, Zhou YT, Hortsch M, Low BC (2012) Cross-species analyses identify the BNIP-2 and Cdc42gap homology (BCH) domain as a distinct functional subclass of the CRAL_TRIO/ sec14 superfamily. PLoS ONE. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0033863
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0033863 pubmed: 23300590 pmcid: 3532443
Joseph PRB, Poluri KM, Gangavarapu P et al (2013) Proline substitution of dimer interface β-strand residues as a strategy for the design of functional monomeric proteins. Biophys J 105(6):1491–1501. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bpj.2013.08.008
doi: 10.1016/j.bpj.2013.08.008 pubmed: 24048001 pmcid: 3785864
Sieger GM, Ziegler WM, Klein DX, Sokol H (2013) Proline: the distribution, frequency, positioning, and common functional roles of proline and polyproline sequences in the human proteome. PLoS ONE 8(1):296–297. https://doi.org/10.1371/JOURNAL.PONE.0053785
doi: 10.1371/JOURNAL.PONE.0053785
Sievers F, Wilm A, Dineen D et al (2011) Fast, scalable generation of high-quality protein multiple sequence alignments using clustal omega. Mol Syst Biol 7(1):539. https://doi.org/10.1038/MSB.2011.75
doi: 10.1038/MSB.2011.75 pubmed: 21988835 pmcid: 3261699
Otwinowski Z, Minor W (1997) Processing of X-ray diffraction data collected in oscillation mode. Methods Enzymol 276:307–326. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0076-6879(97)76066-X
doi: 10.1016/S0076-6879(97)76066-X pubmed: 27754618
Matthews BW (1968) Solvent content of protein crystals. J Mol Biol 33(2):491–497. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-2836(68)90205-2
doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(68)90205-2 pubmed: 5700707
Terwilliger TC, Grosse-Kunstleve RW, Afonine PV et al (2007) Iterative model building, structure refinement and density modification with the PHENIX autoBuild wizard. Acta Crystallographica Sec D https://doi.org/10.1107/S090744490705024X
doi: 10.1107/S090744490705024X
Emsley P, Coot CK (2004) Model-building tools for molecular graphics. Acta Crystallogr D Biol Crystallogr. https://doi.org/10.1107/S0907444904019158
doi: 10.1107/S0907444904019158 pubmed: 15572783
Adams PD, Afonine PV, Bunkóczi G et al (2010) PHENIX: a comprehensive python-based system for macromolecular structure solution. Acta Crystallogr D Biol Crystallogr 66(2):213–221. https://doi.org/10.1107/S0907444909052925
doi: 10.1107/S0907444909052925 pubmed: 20124702 pmcid: 2815670
Laskowski RA, MacArthur MW, Moss DS, Thornton JM (1993) PROCHECK: a program to check the stereochemical quality of protein structures. J Appl Crystallogr 26(2):283–291. https://doi.org/10.1107/s0021889892009944
doi: 10.1107/s0021889892009944

Auteurs

Srihari Shankar (S)

Department of Biological Sciences, National University of Singapore, 14 Science Drive 4, Singapore, 117543, Singapore.

Ti Weng Chew (TW)

Mechanobiology Institute, National University of Singapore, Singapore, 117411, Singapore.

Vishnu Priyanka Reddy Chichili (VPR)

Department of Biological Sciences, National University of Singapore, 14 Science Drive 4, Singapore, 117543, Singapore.

Boon Chuan Low (BC)

Department of Biological Sciences, National University of Singapore, 14 Science Drive 4, Singapore, 117543, Singapore. dbslowbc@nus.edu.sg.
Mechanobiology Institute, National University of Singapore, Singapore, 117411, Singapore. dbslowbc@nus.edu.sg.
NUS College, National University of Singapore, Singapore, 138593, Singapore. dbslowbc@nus.edu.sg.

J Sivaraman (J)

Department of Biological Sciences, National University of Singapore, 14 Science Drive 4, Singapore, 117543, Singapore. dbsjayar@nus.edu.sg.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH