Precision in IOL Calculation for Cataract Patients with Prior History of Combined RK and LASIK Histories.

Barrett True K Barrett True K No History Barrett Universal 2 Camellin-Calossi-Camellin Galilei Haigis-L IOL calculator IOL power OCT PEARL-DGS Panacea Potvin-Hill Shammas double K-modified Holladay intraocular lens laser assisted in situ keratomileusis radial keratotomy

Journal

Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.)
ISSN: 1177-5467
Titre abrégé: Clin Ophthalmol
Pays: New Zealand
ID NLM: 101321512

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
2024
Historique:
received: 19 03 2024
accepted: 28 04 2024
medline: 14 5 2024
pubmed: 14 5 2024
entrez: 14 5 2024
Statut: epublish

Résumé

This study aimed to evaluate the accuracy of 12 intraocular lens (IOL) power calculation formulae for eyes that have undergone both radial keratotomy (RK) and laser assisted in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) surgery to determine the efficacy of various IOL calculations for this unique patient group. Currently, research on this surgical topic is limited. In this retrospective study, 11 eyes from 7 individuals with a history of RK and LASIK who underwent cataract surgery at Hoopes Vision were analyzed. Preoperative biometric and corneal topographic measurements were performed. Subjective refraction was obtained postoperatively. Twelve different intraocular lens (IOL) power calculations were used: Barrett True K No History, Barrett True K (prior LASIK, Prior RK history), Barrett Universal 2, Camellin-Calossi-Camellin (3C), Double K-Modified Holladay, Haigis-L, Galilei, OCT, PEARL-DGS, Potvin-Hill, Panacea, and Shammas. The rankings of mean arithmetic error (MAE), from least to greatest, were as follows: 3C (0.088), Haigis-L-L (-0.508), Shammas (-0.516), OCT Average (-0.538), Barrett True K (-0.557), OCT RK (-0.563), Galilei (-0.570), IOL Master (-0.571), OCT LASIK (-0.583), Barrett True K No History (-0.597), Pearl-DGS (-0.606), Potvin-Hill SF (-0.770), Potvin-Hill TNP (-0.778), Panacea (-0.876), and Barrett Universal 2 (-1.522). The 3C formula achieved the greatest percentage of eyes within ±0.25 D of target range (91%), while Haigis-L, Shammas, Galilei, Potvin Hill, Barrett True K, IOL Master, PEARL-DGS, and OCT formulae performed similarly, achieving 45% of eyes within ±0.75D of target refraction. This study demonstrates the accuracy of the lesser known 3C formula in IOL calculation, particularly for patients who have undergone both RK and LASIK. Well-known formulae, such as Haigis-L, Shammas, and Galilei, which are used by the American Society of Cataract and Refractive Surgery (ASCRS), are viable options, although 3C formulae should be considered in this patient population. Furthermore, larger studies can confirm the best IOL power formulas for post-RK and LASIK cataract patients.

Identifiants

pubmed: 38741583
doi: 10.2147/OPTH.S461988
pii: 461988
pmc: PMC11090196
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

1277-1286

Informations de copyright

© 2024 Moshirfar et al.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

The authors report no conflicts of interest in this work.

Auteurs

Majid Moshirfar (M)

Hoopes Vision Research Center, Hoopes Vision, Draper, UT, USA.
John A. Moran Eye Center, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, UT, USA.
Utah Lions Eye Bank, John A. Moran Eye Center, Murray, UT, USA.

Azraa Ayesha (A)

Spencer Fox Eccles School of Medicine, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA.

Muhammad Jaafar (M)

University of Arizona- Phoenix College of Medicine, Phoenix, AZ, USA.

Kenneth Han (K)

University of Arizona- Phoenix College of Medicine, Phoenix, AZ, USA.

Soroush Omidvarnia (S)

Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center School of Medicine, Lubbock, TX, USA.

Amal Altaf (A)

University of Arizona- Phoenix College of Medicine, Phoenix, AZ, USA.

Isabella M Stoakes (IM)

Hoopes Vision Research Center, Hoopes Vision, Draper, UT, USA.
Pacific Northwest University of Health Science School of Medicine, Yakima, WA, USA.

Phillip C Hoopes (PC)

Hoopes Vision Research Center, Hoopes Vision, Draper, UT, USA.

Classifications MeSH