Canine sexual dimorphism in crown and root dimensions: a cone-beam computed tomographic study.
Canine tooth
Cone-beam Computed Tomography
Forensic Dentistry
Sexual Dimorphism
Tooth length
Journal
The Journal of forensic odonto-stomatology
ISSN: 2219-6749
Titre abrégé: J Forensic Odontostomatol
Pays: Australia
ID NLM: 8501421
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
30 Apr 2024
30 Apr 2024
Historique:
medline:
15
5
2024
pubmed:
15
5
2024
entrez:
14
5
2024
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
The primary step in forensic odontological analysis is sex determination. The present study is one of the few studies that evaluated the accuracy of the combination of canine tooth root length and crown measurements for sex determination. The study sample comprised 196 cone-be am computed tomographic scans of individuals aged 20-80 years distributed in five age categories: 20-29, 30-39, 40-49, 50-59, and 60+ years old. Different parameters, such as width, length, and ratio measurements for the crown and root of each maxillary and mandibular canine tooth, were examined and recorded. The findings indicated that maxillary canines had greater sex dimorphism ability (87.3%) than mandibular canines (80.6%). Total tooth length and root length of maxillary canine were the most pronounced variables in the differentiation of sex groups. When the combination of the mandibular and maxillary measurements was considered, the accuracy for sex dimorphism was 85.7%. By using ratio variables, the accuracy was reduced to 68.9%. According to the findings of this study, total tooth length and root length are the most discriminant variables of canine teeth. These variables are more reliable sex indicators than crown measurements.
Identifiants
pubmed: 38742568
doi: 10.5281/zenodo.11061431
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
12-21Informations de copyright
Copyright© 2024 IOFOS This work is published and licensed by International Organization for Forensic Odonto-Stomatology.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The authors report no conflicts of interest in this work.