Awareness of orthodontic patients towards smartphone orthodontic apps.


Journal

Minerva dental and oral science
ISSN: 2724-6337
Titre abrégé: Minerva Dent Oral Sci
Pays: Italy
ID NLM: 101778009

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
14 May 2024
Historique:
medline: 15 5 2024
pubmed: 15 5 2024
entrez: 14 5 2024
Statut: aheadofprint

Résumé

Mobile phone applications (apps) can potentially enhance patient care as they are easy to use and offer multifunctions. In 2019, 305 orthodontic apps were documented, many of which were patient-focused; however, there was little information on how popular these applications are with orthodontic patients. The main aim of this study was to evaluate how well patients were now aware of orthodontic applications. A survey asking 700 orthodontic patients about their knowledge of, access to, and use of orthodontic apps to facilitate their treatment resulted in 615 responses. The results showed that a smartphone was owned by 96% of patients. Apple (Apple Inc., Cupertino, CA, USA) was the most used platform, followed by Android (Google LLC, Mountain View, CA, USA). Seventy-five percent of patients have previously used social media to research information, with YouTube (YouTube, San Mateo, CA, USA) being the most popular site. Only 3% of patients knew that applications were available to aid with orthodontic therapy and 12 patients had utilized an app linked to orthodontics. Nevertheless, 88% of patients said they would be open to using an app to supplement their treatment. Although 88% of patients said they would be prepared to use an app to help with orthodontic treatment, there is currently a low level of knowledge of the existence of apps. Given the availability of applications geared toward those patients, it is necessary to evaluate these apps' quality and, when critical, direct patients toward high-quality, efficient apps.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
Mobile phone applications (apps) can potentially enhance patient care as they are easy to use and offer multifunctions. In 2019, 305 orthodontic apps were documented, many of which were patient-focused; however, there was little information on how popular these applications are with orthodontic patients. The main aim of this study was to evaluate how well patients were now aware of orthodontic applications.
METHODS METHODS
A survey asking 700 orthodontic patients about their knowledge of, access to, and use of orthodontic apps to facilitate their treatment resulted in 615 responses.
RESULTS RESULTS
The results showed that a smartphone was owned by 96% of patients. Apple (Apple Inc., Cupertino, CA, USA) was the most used platform, followed by Android (Google LLC, Mountain View, CA, USA). Seventy-five percent of patients have previously used social media to research information, with YouTube (YouTube, San Mateo, CA, USA) being the most popular site. Only 3% of patients knew that applications were available to aid with orthodontic therapy and 12 patients had utilized an app linked to orthodontics. Nevertheless, 88% of patients said they would be open to using an app to supplement their treatment.
CONCLUSIONS CONCLUSIONS
Although 88% of patients said they would be prepared to use an app to help with orthodontic treatment, there is currently a low level of knowledge of the existence of apps. Given the availability of applications geared toward those patients, it is necessary to evaluate these apps' quality and, when critical, direct patients toward high-quality, efficient apps.

Identifiants

pubmed: 38743249
pii: S2724-6329.23.04853-2
doi: 10.23736/S2724-6329.23.04853-2
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Auteurs

Haider M A Ahmed (HMA)

Department of Orthodontics, College of Dentistry, University of Baghdad, Baghdad, Iraq.

Dina H Obaid (DH)

Department of Orthodontics, College of Dentistry, University of Baghdad, Baghdad, Iraq.

Hossam I Kadhum (HI)

Ministry of Health, Baghdad, Iraq.

Mohammed Nahidh (M)

Department of Orthodontics, College of Dentistry, University of Baghdad, Baghdad, Iraq.

Marco Cicciù (M)

Department of Biomedical and Surgical and Biomedical Sciences, University of Catania, Catania, Italy.

Giuseppe Minervini (G)

Saveetha Dental College and Hospitals, Saveetha Institute of Medical and Technical Sciences (SIMATS), Saveetha University, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India - giuseppe.minervini@unicampania.it.
Multidisciplinary Department of Medical-Surgical and Odontostomatological Specialties, Luigi Vanvitelli University of Campania, Naples, Italy.

Classifications MeSH