An ecologically sound and participatory monitoring network for pan-Arctic seabirds.
black‐legged kittiwakes
ciencia ciudadana
citizen science
environmental gradients
especie centinela
gaviota tridáctila
gradiente ambiental
key monitoring sites
sentinel species
sitios clave de monitoreo
公民科学
关键监测点
哨兵物种
环境梯度
黑腿三趾鸥
Journal
Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology
ISSN: 1523-1739
Titre abrégé: Conserv Biol
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 9882301
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
15 May 2024
15 May 2024
Historique:
revised:
23
01
2024
received:
08
06
2023
accepted:
18
02
2024
medline:
15
5
2024
pubmed:
15
5
2024
entrez:
15
5
2024
Statut:
aheadofprint
Résumé
In a warming Arctic, circumpolar long-term monitoring programs are key to advancing ecological knowledge and informing environmental policies. Calls for better involvement of Arctic peoples in all stages of the monitoring process are widespread, although such transformation of Arctic science is still in its infancy. Seabirds stand out as ecological sentinels of environmental changes, and priority has been given to implement the Circumpolar Seabird Monitoring Plan (CSMP). We assessed the representativeness of a pan-Arctic seabird monitoring network focused on the black-legged kittiwake (Rissa tridactyla) by comparing the distribution of environmental variables for all known versus monitored colonies. We found that with respect to its spatiotemporal coverage, this monitoring network does not fully embrace current and future environmental gradients. To improve the current scheme, we designed a method to identify colonies whose inclusion in the monitoring network will improve its ecological representativeness, limit logistical constraints, and improve involvement of Arctic peoples. We thereby highlight that inclusion of study sites in the Bering Sea, Siberia, western Russia, northern Norway, and southeastern Greenland could improve the current monitoring network and that their proximity to local populations might allow increased involvement of local communities. Our framework can be applied to improve existing monitoring networks in other ecoregions and sociological contexts. Una red de monitoreo participativa y ecológica para las aves marinas del Ártico Resumen En un Ártico cada vez más cálido, los programas circumpolares de monitoreo a largo plazo son importantes para potenciar el conocimiento ecológico e informar las políticas ambientales. Existe un llamado generalizado para involucrar de mejor manera a los pueblos árticos en el proceso de monitoreo, aunque dicha transformación de la ciencia ártica todavía está en desarrollo. Las aves marinas resaltan como centinelas del cambio ambiental y se ha priorizado implementar el Plan Circumpolar de Monitoreo de Aves Marinas (CSMP). Comparamos la distribución de las variables ambientales de todas las colonias conocidas de la gaviota tridáctila (Rissa tridactyla) contra las colonias monitoreadas para evaluar la representación de una red pan‐ártica de monitoreo enfocada en esta especie. Encontramos que esta red de monitoreo no considera del todo los gradientes ambientales actuales y futuros con respecto a la cobertura espaciotemporal. Para mejorar el esquema actual, diseñamos un método para identificar las colonias cuya inclusión en la red de monitoreo mejorará su representación ecológica, limitará las restricciones logísticas e incrementará la participación de los pueblos árticos. Por lo tanto, resaltamos que la inclusión de los sitios de estudio en el Mar de Bering, Siberia, Rusia occidental, el norte de Noruega y el sureste de Groenlandia mejorarían la red actual de monitoreo. También destacamos que la proximidad de los sitios de estudio con las poblaciones locales podría permitir una mayor participación de estas. Nuestro marco puede aplicarse para mejorar las redes de monitoreo existentes en otros contextos socioecológicos y ecoregiones. 在北极气候变暖的背景下, 开展环北极长期监测项目对于积累生态知识、指导环境政策十分重要。尽管促进北极居民更好地参与监测过程各个阶段的呼声很高, 但北极科学的这种转型仍处于起步阶段。海鸟是环境变化的生态哨兵, 实施环北极海鸟监测项目已被视为保护优先事项。本研究通过比较所有已知鸟类聚居地和受监测鸟类聚居地的环境变量分布情况, 评估了以黑腿三趾鸥(Rissa tridactyla)为重点的泛北极海鸟监测网络的代表性。我们发现, 在时空覆盖度方面, 该监测网络尚未完全覆盖当前和未来的环境梯度。为了改进现有方案, 我们设计了一种方法来识别应在监测网络中纳入哪些鸟类聚居地, 以提升其生态代表性、减少后勤运输限制, 并提高北极居民的参与度。结果强调, 纳入白令海、西伯利亚、俄罗斯西部、挪威北部和格陵兰东南部的研究位点将有助于改进现有的监测网络, 且这些位点靠近当地居民, 可能有助于提高当地社区的参与度。我们的框架可用于改进其他生态区和社会环境背景下的现有监测网络。【翻译: 胡怡思; 审校: 聂永刚】.
Autres résumés
Type: Publisher
(spa)
Una red de monitoreo participativa y ecológica para las aves marinas del Ártico Resumen En un Ártico cada vez más cálido, los programas circumpolares de monitoreo a largo plazo son importantes para potenciar el conocimiento ecológico e informar las políticas ambientales. Existe un llamado generalizado para involucrar de mejor manera a los pueblos árticos en el proceso de monitoreo, aunque dicha transformación de la ciencia ártica todavía está en desarrollo. Las aves marinas resaltan como centinelas del cambio ambiental y se ha priorizado implementar el Plan Circumpolar de Monitoreo de Aves Marinas (CSMP). Comparamos la distribución de las variables ambientales de todas las colonias conocidas de la gaviota tridáctila (Rissa tridactyla) contra las colonias monitoreadas para evaluar la representación de una red pan‐ártica de monitoreo enfocada en esta especie. Encontramos que esta red de monitoreo no considera del todo los gradientes ambientales actuales y futuros con respecto a la cobertura espaciotemporal. Para mejorar el esquema actual, diseñamos un método para identificar las colonias cuya inclusión en la red de monitoreo mejorará su representación ecológica, limitará las restricciones logísticas e incrementará la participación de los pueblos árticos. Por lo tanto, resaltamos que la inclusión de los sitios de estudio en el Mar de Bering, Siberia, Rusia occidental, el norte de Noruega y el sureste de Groenlandia mejorarían la red actual de monitoreo. También destacamos que la proximidad de los sitios de estudio con las poblaciones locales podría permitir una mayor participación de estas. Nuestro marco puede aplicarse para mejorar las redes de monitoreo existentes en otros contextos socioecológicos y ecoregiones.
Type: Publisher
(chi)
在北极气候变暖的背景下, 开展环北极长期监测项目对于积累生态知识、指导环境政策十分重要。尽管促进北极居民更好地参与监测过程各个阶段的呼声很高, 但北极科学的这种转型仍处于起步阶段。海鸟是环境变化的生态哨兵, 实施环北极海鸟监测项目已被视为保护优先事项。本研究通过比较所有已知鸟类聚居地和受监测鸟类聚居地的环境变量分布情况, 评估了以黑腿三趾鸥(Rissa tridactyla)为重点的泛北极海鸟监测网络的代表性。我们发现, 在时空覆盖度方面, 该监测网络尚未完全覆盖当前和未来的环境梯度。为了改进现有方案, 我们设计了一种方法来识别应在监测网络中纳入哪些鸟类聚居地, 以提升其生态代表性、减少后勤运输限制, 并提高北极居民的参与度。结果强调, 纳入白令海、西伯利亚、俄罗斯西部、挪威北部和格陵兰东南部的研究位点将有助于改进现有的监测网络, 且这些位点靠近当地居民, 可能有助于提高当地社区的参与度。我们的框架可用于改进其他生态区和社会环境背景下的现有监测网络。【翻译: 胡怡思; 审校: 聂永刚】.
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
e14287Subventions
Organisme : Agence Nationale de la Recherche
ID : ILETOP
Organisme : Agence Nationale de la Recherche
ID : INTERARCTIC
Organisme : Belmont Forum
ID : TAMANI project
Organisme : French Polar Institute IPEV
ID : ADACLIM Progr 388
Informations de copyright
© 2024 The Authors. Conservation Biology published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of Society for Conservation Biology.
Références
Alexander, S. M., Provencher, J. F., Henri, D. A., Taylor, J. J., Lloren, J. I., Nanayakkara, L., Johnson, J. T., & Steven, J. C. (2019). Bridging Indigenous and science‐based knowledge in coastal and marine research, monitoring, and management in Canada. Environmental Evidence, 8, 36.
Alvestad, R. J. (2015). Effects of climate on chick growth in the black‐legged kittiwake (Rissa tridactyla). Norwegian University of Science and Technology.
Amélineau, F., Grémillet, D., Harding, A. M. A., Walkusz, W., Choquet, R., & Fort, J. (2019). Arctic climate change and pollution impact little auk foraging and fitness across a decade. Scientific Reports, 9(1), 1014.
Barry, T., Daviðsdóttir, B., Einarsson, N., & Young, O. R. (2020). The Arctic Council: An agent of change? Global Environmental Change, 63, 102099.
Bates, D., Mächler, M., Bolker, B., & Walker, S. (2015). Fitting linear mixed‐effects models using lme4. Journal of Statistical Software, 67(1), 1–48.
Bhattacharyya, A. (1943). On a measure of divergence between two statistical populations defined by their probability distributions. Bulletin of the Calcutta Mathematical Society, 35, 99–109.
BirdLife International. (2019). Rissa tridactyla (amended version of 2018 assessment). The IUCN red list of threatened species 2019: E.T22694497A155617539. https://doi.org/10.2305/IUCN.UK.2018‐2.RLTS.T22694497A155617539.en
Bjorkman, A. D., García Criado, M., Myers‐Smith, I. H., Ravolainen, V., Jónsdóttir, I. S., Westergaard, K. B., Lawler, J. P., Aronsson, M., Bennet, B., Gardfjell, H., Heiðmarsson, S., Stewart, L., & Normand, S. (2020). Status and trends in Arctic vegetation: Evidence from experimental warming and long‐term monitoring. Ambio, 49(3), 678–692.
Boertmann, D., Merkel, F., & Gilg, O. (2020). Seabird breeding colonies in East and North Greenland. Arctic, 73(1), 20–39.
Cam, E., Cafiou, B., Hines, J. E., & Monnat, J. (2002). Influence of behavioural tactics on recruitment and reproductive trajectory in the kittiwake. Journal of Applied Statistics, 29(1‐4), 163–185.
Certain, G., Jørgensen, L. L., Christel, I., Planque, B., & Bretagnolle, V. (2015). Mapping the vulnerability of animal community to pressure in marine systems: Disentangling pressure types and integrating their impact from the individual to the community level. ICES Journal of Marine Science, 72(5), 1470–1482.
Chesser, S., Porter, M. M., & Tuckett, A. G. (2020). Cultivating citizen‐science for all: Ethical considerations for research projects involving diverse and marginalized populations. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 23(5), 497–508.
Christensen, T., Barry, T., Taylor, J. J., Doyle, M., Aronsson, M., Braa, J., Burns, C., Coon, C., Coulson, S., Cuyler, C., Falk, K., Heiðmarsson, S., Kulmala, P., Lawler, J., MacNearney, D., Ravolainen, V., Smith, P. A., Soloviev, M., & Schmidt, N. M. (2020). Developing a circumpolar programme for the monitoring of Arctic terrestrial biodiversity. Ambio, 49(3), 655–665.
Christensen‐Dalsgaard, S., May, R., & Lorentsen, S. H. (2018). Taking a trip to the shelf: Behavioral decisions are mediated by the proximity to foraging habitats in the black‐legged kittiwake. Ecology and Evolution, 8, 866–878.
Conservation of Arctic Flora and Fauna (CAFF). (2020). International Black‐legged Kittiwake Conservation Strategy and Action Plan. Circumpolar Seabird Expert Group. Conservation of Arctic Flora and Fauna, Akureyri, Iceland. ISBN 978‐9935‐431‐85‐1.
Couvet, D., & Prevot, A.‐C. (2015). Citizen‐science programs: Towards transformative biodiversity governance. Environmental Development, 13, 39–45.
Descamps, S., Anker‐Nilssen, T., Barrett, R. T., Irons, D. B., Merkel, F., Robertson, G. J., Yoccoz, N. G., Mallory, M. L., Montevecchi, W. A., Boertmann, D., Artukhin, Y., Christensen‐Dalsgaard, S., Erikstad, K. E., Gilchrist, H. G., Labansen, A. L., Lorentsen, S. H., Mosbech, A., Olsen, B., Petersen, A., … Zelenskaya, L. (2017). Circumpolar dynamics of a marine top‐predator track ocean warming rates. Global Change Biology, 23(9), 3770–3780.
Dietz, R., Letcher, R. J., Desforges, J.‐P., Eulaers, I., Sonne, C., Wilson, S., Andersen‐Ranberg, E., Basu, N., Barst, B. D., Bustnes, J. O., Bytingsvik, J., Ciesielski, T. M., Drevnick, P. E., Gabrielsen, G. W., Haarr, A., Hylland, K., Jenssen, B. M., Levin, M., McKinney, M. A., … Víkingsson, G. (2019). Current state of knowledge on biological effects from contaminants on arctic wildlife and fish. Science of The Total Environment, 696, 133792.
Edney, A. J., & Wood, M. J. (2020). Applications of digital imaging and analysis in seabird monitoring and research. Ibis, 163, 317–337.
Elliott, K. H., Chivers, L. S., Bessey, L., Gaston, A. J., Hatch, S. A., Kato, A., Osborne, O., Ropert‐Coudert, Y., Speakman, J. R., & Hare, J. F. (2014). Windscapes shape seabird instantaneous energy costs but adult behavior buffers impact on offspring. Movement Ecology, 2(1), 17.
Ens, E. J., Pert, P., Clarke, P. A., Budden, M., Clubb, L., Doran, B., Douras, C., Gaikwad, J., Gott, B., Leonard, S., Locke, J., Packer, J., Turpin, G., & Wason, S. (2015). Indigenous biocultural knowledge in ecosystem science and management: Review and insight from Australia. Biological Conservation, 181, 133–149.
Frederiksen, M., Edwards, M., RA, M., & Wanless, S. (2007). Regional and annual variation in black‐legged kittiwake breeding productivity is related to sea surface temperature. Marine Ecology Progress Series, 350, 137–143.
Furness, R. W., & Camphuysen, K. (1997). Seabirds as monitors of the marine environment. ICES Journal of Marine Science, 54(4), 726–737.
Grémillet, D., & Descamps, S. (2023). Ecological impacts of climate change on Arctic marine megafauna. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 38(8), 773–783.
Hamre, T., Danielsen, F., Poulsen, M. K., & Monsen, F. A. (2022). Standards‐based data catalogue integrating scientific, community‐based and citizen science data across the Arctic. EGU General Assembly, 2021, EGU21‐15783. https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere‐egu21‐15783
Harris, S. M., Sneddon, L. U., Chastel, O., & Patrick, S. C. (2020). Personality predicts foraging site fidelity and trip repeatability in a marine predator. Journal of Animal Ecology, 89, 68–79.
Hauser, D. D., Whiting, A. V., Mahoney, A. R., Goodwin, J., Harris, C., Schaeffer, R. J., & Zappa, C. J. (2021). Co‐production of knowledge reveals loss of Indigenous hunting opportunities in the face of accelerating Arctic climate change. Environmental Research Letters, 16(9), 095003.
Heino, J., Culp, J. M., Erkinaro, J., Goedkoop, W., Lento, J., Rühland, K. M., & Smol, J. P. (2020). Abruptly and irreversibly changing Arctic freshwaters urgently require standardized monitoring. Journal of Applied Ecology, 57(7), 1192–1198.
Hinke, J. T., Barbosa, A., Emmerson, L. M., Hart, T., Juáres, M. A., Korczak‐Abshire, M., Milinevsky, G., Santos, M., Trathan, P. N., Watters, G. M., & Southwell, C. (2018). Estimating nest‐level phenology and reproductive success of colonial seabirds using time‐lapse cameras. Methods in Ecology and Evolution, 9, 1853–1863.
Huffeldt, N. P., & Merkel, F. R. (2013). Remote time‐lapse photography as a monitoring tool for colonial breeding seabirds: A case study using Thick‐billed Murres (Uria lomvia). Waterbirds, 36(3), 330–341.
Hughes, B. B., Beas‐Luna, R., Barner, A. K., Brewitt, K., Brumbaugh, D. R., Cerny‐Chipman, E. B., Close, S. L., Coblentz, K. E., De Nesnera, K. L., Drobnitch, S. T., Figurski, J. D., Focht, B., Friedman, M., Freiwald, J., Heady, K. K., Heady, W. N., Hettinger, A., Johnson, A., Karr, K. A., … Carr, M. H. (2017). Long‐term studies contribute disproportionately to ecology and policy. Bioscience, 67(3), 271–278.
Huntington, H. P., Carey, M., Apok, C., Forbes, B. C., Fox, S., Holm, L. K., Ivanova, A., Jaypoody, J., Noongwook, G., & Stammler, F. (2019). Climate change in context: Putting people first in the Arctic. Regional Environmental Change, 19(4), 1217–1223.
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPPC). (2021). Summary for Policymakers. In V. Masson‐Delmotte, P. Zhai, A. Pirani, S. L. Connors, C. Péan, S. Berger, N. Caud, Y. Chen, L. Goldfarb, M. I. Gomis, M. Huang, K. Leitzell, E. Lonnoy, J. B. R. Matthews, T. K. Maycock, T. Waterfield, O. Yelekçi, R. Yu, & B. Zhou (Eds.), Climate Change 2021: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (pp. 3–32). Cambridge University Press. https://www.ipcc.ch/report/ar6/wg1/
Inuit Circumpolar Council Alaska. (2020). Food sovereignty and self‐governance: Inuit role in managing arctic marine resources. Author.
Inuit Circumpolar Council. (2020). Policy paper on the matter of “Local communities”. https://iccalaska.org/wp‐icc/wp‐content/uploads/2020/10/FINAL‐ICC‐Policy‐Paper‐on‐matter‐of‐local‐communities.pdf
Inuit Tapiriit Kanatami. (2018). National Inuit strategy on research. Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
Irons, D., Petersen, A., Anker‐Nilssen, T., Artukhin, Y., Barrett, R., Boertmann, D., Gavrilo, M. V., Gilchrist, G., Hansen, E. S., Hario, M., Kuletz, K., Mallory, M., Merkel, F., Mosbech, A., Labansen, A. L., Olsen, B., Österblom, H., Reid, J., Robertson, G., … Strøm, H. (2015). Circumpolar Seabird Monitoring Plan. CAFF Monitoring Report No. 17. https://oaarchive.arctic‐council.org/items/2cce8587‐8e40‐4144‐8580‐2b6d718d4fb4
Jones, F. M., Allen, C., Arteta, C., Arthur, J., Black, C., Emmerson, L. E., Freeman, R., Hines, G., Lintott, C. J., Macháčková, Z., Miller, G., Simpson, R., Soutwell, C., Torsey, H. R., Zisserman, A., & Hart, T. (2018). Time‐lapse imagery and volunteer classifications from the Zooniverse Penguin Watch project. Scientific Data, 5, 180124.
Jones, F. M., Arteta, C., Zisserman, A., Lempitsky, V., Lintott, C. J., & Hart, T. (2020). Processing citizen science‐and machine‐annotated time‐lapse imagery for biologically meaningful metrics. Scientific Data, 7, 102.
Kane, A., Pirotta, E., Wischnewski, S., Critchley, E. J., Bennison, A., & Jessopp, M. (2020). Spatio‐temporal patterns of foraging behaviour in a wide‐ranging seabird reveal the role of primary productivity in locating prey. Marine Ecology Progress Series, 646, 175–188.
Knopp, J. A., Levenstein, B., Watson, A., Ivanova, I., & Lento, J. (2022). Systematic review of documented Indigenous Knowledge of freshwater biodiversity in the circumpolar Arctic. Freshwater Biology, 67(1), 194–209.
Kochanowicz, Z., Dawson, J., Halliday, W. D., Sawada, M., Copland, L., Carter, N. A., Nicoll, A., Ferguson, S. H., Heide‐Jørgensen, M. P., Marcoux, M., Watt, C., & Yurkowski, D. J. (2021). Using western science and Inuit knowledge to model ship‐source noise exposure for cetaceans (marine mammals) in Tallurutiup Imanga (Lancaster Sound), Nunavut, Canada. Marine Policy, 130, 104557.
Kroodsma, D. A., Mayorga, J., Hochberg, T., Miller, N. A., Boerder, K., Ferretti, F., Wilson, A., Bergman, B., White, T. D., Block, B. A., Woods, P., Sullivan, B., Costello, C., & Worm, B. (2018). Tracking the global footprint of fisheries. Science, 361(6378), 904–908.
Ksenofontov, S., Backhaus, N., & Schaepman‐Strub, G. (2019). “There are new species”: Indigenous Knowledge of biodiversity change in Arctic Yakutia. Polar Geography, 42(1), 34–57.
Likens, G., & Lindenmayer, D. (2018). Effective ecological monitoring. CSIRO Publishing. https://books.google.fr/books?id=QDBZDwAAQBAJ
Logan, S., Christensen, T., Barry, T., Price, C., & Lárussoon, K. (2018). Circumpolar Biodiversity Monitoring Program Strategic Plan: 2018–2021. Conservation of Arctic Fauna and Flora (CAFF) working group of the Arctic Council.
Mallory, M. L., Gilchrist, H. G., Janssen, M., Major, H. L., Merkel, F., Provencher, J. F., & Strøm, H. (2018). Financial costs of conducting science in the Arctic: Examples from seabird research. Arctic Science, 4(4), 624–633.
Mallory, M. L., Fontaine, A. J., Akearok, J. A., & Johnston, V. H. (2006). Synergy of local ecological knowledge, community involvement and scientific study to develop marine wildlife areas in eastern Arctic Canada. Polar Record, 42(3), 205–216.
Mallory, M. L., Gilchrist, H. G., Fontaine, A. J., & Akearok, J. A. (2003). Local ecological knowledge of Ivory gull declines in Arctic Canada. Arctic, 56(3), 293–298.
Mallory, M. L., Toomasie, J., Emond, S., Lamarche, G., Roberts, L., Pirie‐Dominix, L., & Provencher, J. F. (2022). Community‐scientist collaboration in the creation, management and research for two National Wildlife Areas in Arctic Canada. In J. M. Holzer, J. Baird, & G. M. Hickey (Eds.), Pluralism in ecosystem governance (pp. 37–61). Academic Press.
Markussen, U. (2016). Towards an Arctic awakening: Neocolonalism, sustainable development, emancipatory research, collective action, and Arctic regional policymaking. In K. Latola & H. Savela (Eds.), The Inter‐connected Arctic, UArctic Congress 2016 (pp. 305–311). Springer.
Merkel, F. R. (2004). Evidence of population decline in common eiders breeding in Western Greenland. Arctic, 57, 27–36.
Merkel, F. R., Johansen, K. L., & Kristensen, A. J. (2016). Use of time‐lapse photography and digital images to estimate breeding success of a cliff‐nesting seabird. Journal of Field Ornithology, 87, 84–95.
Osborne, O. E., O'Hara, P. D., Whelan, S., Zandbergen, P., Hatch, S. A., & Elliott, K. H. (2020). Breeding seabirds increase foraging range in response to an extreme marine heatwave. Marine Ecology Progress Series, 646, 161–173.
Pearce, S. M. (1987). Ivory, antler, feather and wood: Material culture and the cosmology of the Cumberland Sound Inult, Baffin Island, Canada. Canadian Journal of Native Studies, 7(2), 307–321.
Pratte, I., Braune, B. M., Hobson, K. A., & Mallory, M. L. (2019). Variable sea‐ice conditions influence trophic dynamics in an Arctic community of marine top predators. Ecology and Evolution, 9(13), 7639–7651.
Provencher, J., Kögel, T., Lusher, A., Vorkamp, K., Gomiero, A., Peeken, I., Granberg, M., Hammer, S., Baak, J., Larsen, J. R., & Farmen, E. (2022). An ecosystem‐scale litter and microplastic monitoring plan under the Arctic Monitoring and Assessment Programme (AMAP). Arctic Science, 8, 1067–1081.
Rantanen, M., Karpechko, A. Y., Lipponen, A., Nordling, K., Hyvärinen, O., Ruosteenoja, K., Vihma, T., & Laaksonen, A. (2022). The Arctic has warmed nearly four times faster than the globe since 1979. Communications Earth and Environment, 3, 168.
Sandalh, A., & Tøttrup, A. P. (2020). Marine citizen science: Recent developments and future recommendations. Citizen Science: Theory and Practice, 5(1), 24.
Sauve, D., Charmantier, A., Hatch, S. A., & Friesen, V. L. (2022). Environmental conditions variably affect growth across the breeding season in a subarctic seabird. Oecologia, 198, 307–318.
Schwalm, C. R., Glendon, S., & Duffy, P. B. (2020). RCP8.5 tracks cumulative CO2 emissions. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 117(33), 19656–19657.
Silverman, B. W. (1986). Density estimation for statistics and data analysis. Monographs on statistics and applied probability (Vol. 26). Chapman and Hall.
Wang, M., & Overland, J. E. (2015). Projected future duration of the sea‐ice‐free season in the Alaskan Arctic. Progress in Oceanography, 136, 50–59.
Ward‐Fear, G., Pauly, G. B., Vendetti, J. E., & Shine, R. (2019). Authorship protocols must change to credit citizen scientists. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 35(3), 187–190.
Wein, E., Freeman, M., & Makus, J. (1996). Use of and preference for traditional foods among the Belcher Island Inuit. Arctic, 49(3), 256–264.
Wheeler, H. C., Berteaux, D., Furgal, C., Parlee, B., Yoccoz, N. G., & Grémillet, D. (2016). Stakeholder perspectives on triage in wildlife monitoring in a rapidly changing Arctic. Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution, 4, 128.
Wheeler, H. C., Danielsen, F., Fidel, M., Hausner, V., Horstkotte, T., Johnson, N., Lee, O., Mukherjee, N., Amos, A., Ashthorn, H., Ballari, Ø., Behe, C., Breton‐Honeyman, K., Retter, G. B., Buschman, V., Jakobsen, P., Johnson, F., Lyberth, B., Parrott, J. A., … Vronski, N. (2020). The need for transformative changes in the use of Indigenous knowledge along with science for environmental decision‐making in the Arctic. People and Nature, 2, 544–556.
Young, R. C., Kitaysky, A. S., Carothers, C., & Dorresteijn, I. (2014). Seabirds as a subsistence and cultural resource in two remote Alaskan communities. Ecology and Society, 19(4), 40.