Defining the optimal segmentation method for measuring somatostatin receptor expressing tumor volume on 68Ga-DOTATATE positron emission tomography/computed tomography to predict prognosis in patients with gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors.


Journal

Nuclear medicine communications
ISSN: 1473-5628
Titre abrégé: Nucl Med Commun
Pays: England
ID NLM: 8201017

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
15 May 2024
Historique:
medline: 15 5 2024
pubmed: 15 5 2024
entrez: 15 5 2024
Statut: aheadofprint

Résumé

We aimed to compare different segmentation methods used to calculate prognostically valuable volumetric parameters, somatostatin receptor expressing tumor volume (SRETV), and total lesion somatostatin receptor expression (TLSRE), measured by 68Ga-DOTATATE PET/CT and to find the optimal segmentation method to predict prognosis. Images of 34 patients diagnosed with gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumor (GEPNET) who underwent 68Ga-DOTATATE PET/CT imaging were reanalyzed. Four different threshold-based methods (fixed relative threshold method, normal liver background threshold method, fixed absolute standardized uptake value (SUV) threshold method, and adaptive threshold method) were used to calculate SRETV and TLSRE values. SRETV of all lesions of a patient was summarized as whole body SRETV (WB-SRETV) and TLSRE of all lesions of a patient was computed as whole body TLSRE (WB-TLSRE). WB-SRETVs calculated with all segmentation methods were statistically significantly associated with progression-free survival except WB-SRETVat which was calculated using adaptive threshold method. The fixed relative threshold methods calculated by using 45% (WB-SRETV45%) and 60% (WB-SRETV60%) of the SUV value as threshold respectively, were found to have statistically significant highest prognostic value (C-index = 0.704, CI = 0.622-0.786, P = 0.007). Among WB-TLSRE parameters, WB-TLSRE35%, WB-TLSRE40%, and WB-TLSRE50% had the highest prognostic value (C-index = 0.689, CI = 0.604-0.774, P = 0.008). The fixed relative threshold method was found to be the most effective and easily applicable method to measure SRETV on pretreatment 68Ga-DOTATATE PET/CT to predict prognosis in GEPNET patients. WB-SRETV45% (cutoff value of 11.8 cm3) and WB-SRETV60% (cutoff value of 6.3 cm3) were found to be the strongest predictors of prognosis in GEPNET patients.

Identifiants

pubmed: 38745508
doi: 10.1097/MNM.0000000000001861
pii: 00006231-990000000-00300
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2024 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.

Références

Oronsky B, Ma PC, Morgensztern D, Carter CA. Nothing but NET: a review of neuroendocrine tumors and carcinomas. Neoplasia 2017; 19:991–1002.
Ito T, Masui T, Komoto I, Doi R, Osamura RY, Sakurai A, et al. JNETS clinical practice guidelines for gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms: diagnosis, treatment, and follow-up: a synopsis. J Gastroenterol 2021; 56:1033–1044.
Park S, Parihar AS, Bodei L, Hope TA, Mallak N, Millo C, et al. Somatostatin receptor imaging and theranostics: current practice and future prospects. J Nucl Med 2021; 62:1323–1329.
Ramachandran A, Madhusudhan KS. Advances in the imaging of gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms. World J Gastroenterol 2022; 28:3008–3026.
Toriihara A, Baratto L, Nobashi T, Park S, Hatami N, Davidzon G, et al. Prognostic value of somatostatin receptor expressing tumor volume calculated from 68Ga-DOTATATE PET/CT in patients with well-differentiated neuroendocrine tumors. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2019; 46:2244–2251.
Hou J, Yang Y, Chen N, Chen D, Hu S. Prognostic value of volume-based parameters measured by SSTR PET/CT in neuroendocrine tumors: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Front Med (Lausanne) 2021; 8:771912.
Nioche C, Orlhac F, Boughdad S, Reuzé S, Goya-Outi J, Robert C, et al. LIFEx: a freeware for radiomic feature calculation in multimodality imaging to accelerate advances in the characterization of tumor heterogeneity. Cancer Res 2018; 78:4786–4789.
Özgüven S, Filizoğlu N, Kesim S, Öksüzoğlu K, Şen F, Öneş T, et al. Physiological biodistribution of 68Ga-DOTA-TATE in normal subjects. Mol Imaging Radionucl Ther 2021; 30:39–46.
Nestle U, Kremp S, Schaefer-Schuler A, Sebastian-Welsch C, Hellwig D, Rübe C, et al. Comparison of different methods for delineation of 18F-FDG PET-positive tissue for target volume definition in radiotherapy of patients with non-small cell lung cancer. J Nucl Med 2005; 46:1342–1348.
Carlsen EA, Johnbeck CB, Loft M, Pfeifer A, Oturai P, Langer SW, et al. Semiautomatic tumor delineation for evaluation of 64Cu-DOTATATE PET/CT in patients with neuroendocrine neoplasms: prognostication based on lowest lesion uptake and total tumor volume. J Nucl Med 2021; 62:1564–1570.
Pauwels E, Van Binnebeek S, Vandecaveye V, Baete K, Vanbilloen H, Koole M, et al. Inflammation-based index and 68Ga-DOTATOC PET-derived uptake and volumetric parameters predict outcome in neuroendocrine tumor patients treated with 90Y-DOTATOC. J Nucl Med 2020; 61:1014–1020.
Tirosh A, Papadakis GZ, Millo C, Hammoud D, Sadowski SM, Herscovitch P, et al. Prognostic utility of total 68Ga-DOTATATE-avid tumor volume in patients with neuroendocrine tumors. Gastroenterology 2018; 154:998–1008.e1.
Erdi YE, Mawlawi O, Larson SM, Imbriaco M, Yeung H, Finn R, et al. Segmentation of lung lesion volume by adaptive positron emission tomography image thresholding. Cancer 1997; 80:2505–2509.
Ohlendorf F, Henkenberens C, Brunkhorst T, Ross TL, Christiansen H, Bengel FM, et al. Volumetric 68Ga-DOTA-TATE PET/CT for assessment of whole-body tumor burden as a quantitative imaging biomarker in patients with metastatic gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors. Q J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2022; 66:361–371.
Ohnona J, Nataf V, Gauthe M, Balogova S, Belissant Benesty O, Zhang-Yin J, et al. Prognostic value of functional tumor burden on 68Ga-DOTATOC PET/CT in patients with pancreatic neuro-endocrine tumors. Neoplasma 2019; 66:140–148.
Chen L, Jumai N, He Q, Liu M, Lin Y, Luo Y, et al. The role of quantitative tumor burden based on [68 Ga]Ga-DOTA-NOC PET/CT in well-differentiated neuroendocrine tumors: beyond prognosis. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2023; 50:525–534.
Kim YI, Yoo C, Oh SJ, Lee SJ, Kang J, Hwang HS, et al. Tumour-to-liver ratio determined by [68Ga]Ga-DOTA-TOC PET/CT as a prognostic factor of lanreotide efficacy for patients with well-differentiated gastroenteropancreatic-neuroendocrine tumours. EJNMMI Res 2020; 10:63.
Ortega C, Wong RKS, Schaefferkoetter J, Veit-Haibach P, Myrehaug S, Juergens R, et al. Quantitative 68Ga-DOTATATE PET/CT parameters for the prediction of therapy response in patients with progressive metastatic neuroendocrine tumors treated with 177Lu-DOTATATE. J Nucl Med 2021; 62:1406–1414.
Tatewaki Y, Terao CM, Ariake K, Saito R, Mutoh T, Shimomura H, et al. Defining the optimal method for measuring metabolic tumor volume on preoperative 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography/computed tomography as a prognostic predictor in patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. Front Oncol 2021; 11:646141.
Hofman MS, Lau WF, Hicks RJ. Somatostatin receptor imaging with 68Ga DOTATATE PET/CT: clinical utility, normal patterns, pearls, and pitfalls in interpretation. Radiographics 2015; 35:500–516.
Geets X, Lee JA, Bol A, Lonneux M, Grégoire V. A gradient-based method for segmenting FDG-PET images: methodology and validation. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2007; 34:1427–1438.
Lapuyade-Lahorgue J, Visvikis D, Pradier O, Cheze Le Rest C, Hatt M. SPEQTACLE. An automated generalized fuzzy C-means algorithm for tumor delineation in PET. Med Phys 2015; 42:5720–5734.
Hatt M, Cheze le Rest C, Descourt P, Dekker A, De Ruysscher D, Oellers M, et al. Accurate automatic delineation of heterogeneous functional volumes in positron emission tomography for oncology applications. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2010; 77:301–308.
Otsu N. A threshold selection method from gray-level histograms. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern 1979; 9:62–66.

Auteurs

Nuh Filizoglu (N)

Department of Nuclear Medicine, University of Health Sciences, Kartal Dr. Lutfi Kirdar City Hospital.

Salih Ozguven (S)

Department of Nuclear Medicine, Marmara University Pendik Training and Research Hospital.

Tugba Akin Telli (T)

Department of Oncology, Memorial Sisli Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey.

Tunc Ones (T)

Department of Nuclear Medicine, Marmara University Pendik Training and Research Hospital.

Fuat Dede (F)

Department of Nuclear Medicine, Marmara University Pendik Training and Research Hospital.

Halil T Turoglu (HT)

Department of Nuclear Medicine, Marmara University Pendik Training and Research Hospital.

Tanju Y Erdil (TY)

Department of Nuclear Medicine, Marmara University Pendik Training and Research Hospital.

Classifications MeSH