Daily-life stress reactivity and recovery following virtual-reality-based cognitive behavioral therapy in patients with a psychotic disorder.

VR paranoia psychosis stress reactivity stress recovery

Journal

Frontiers in psychiatry
ISSN: 1664-0640
Titre abrégé: Front Psychiatry
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101545006

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
2024
Historique:
received: 22 12 2023
accepted: 15 04 2024
medline: 15 5 2024
pubmed: 15 5 2024
entrez: 15 5 2024
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Studies have consistently demonstrated increased stress sensitivity in individuals with psychosis. Since stress sensitivity may play a role in the onset and maintenance of psychosis, this could potentially be a promising target for treatment. The current study was the first to investigate whether reactivity to and recovery from daily-life stressors in psychosis change in response to treatment, namely virtual-reality-based cognitive behavioral therapy (VR-CBT). 116 patients were randomized to either VR-CBT or the waiting list control group (WL). Pre-treatment and post-treatment participants completed a diary ten times a day during six to ten days. Multilevel analyses were used to model the time-lagged effects of daily stressful events on negative affect (NA) and paranoia symptoms to examine reactivity and recovery. There was a significant difference in NA reactivity. VR-CBT showed higher NA at post-treatment compared to pre-treatment than WL (b Negative affect and paranoia recovery improved in response to treatment. Increased NA reactivity may be explained by a decrease in safety behavior in the VR-CBT group. The discrepancy between reactivity and recovery findings may be explained by the inhibitory learning theory that suggests that an original threat reaction may not erase but can be inhibited as a consequence of exposure therapy.

Identifiants

pubmed: 38745779
doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2024.1360165
pmc: PMC11091723
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

1360165

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2024 van der Stouwe, Booij, Geraets, Pot-Kolder, Kuranova, van der Gaag and Veling.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Auteurs

Elisabeth C D van der Stouwe (ECD)

University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Department of Psychiatry, Groningen, Netherlands.

Sanne H Booij (SH)

University Medical Center Groningen, University Center Psychiatry (UCP) Interdisciplinary Center Psychopathology and Emotion Regulation (ICPE), University of Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands.
Center for Integrative Psychiatry, Lentis, Groningen, Netherlands.

Chris N W Geraets (CNW)

University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Department of Psychiatry, Groningen, Netherlands.

Roos M C A Pot-Kolder (RMCA)

University of Melbourne, Centre for Youth Mental Health, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Department of Psychology, Health and Technology, Orygen, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.

Anna Kuranova (A)

University Medical Center Groningen, University Center Psychiatry (UCP) Interdisciplinary Center Psychopathology and Emotion Regulation (ICPE), University of Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands.

Mark van der Gaag (M)

VU University and Amsterdam Public Mental Health Research Institute, Department of Clinical Psychology, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
Parnassia Psychiatric Institute, The Hague, Netherlands.

Wim Veling (W)

University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Department of Psychiatry, Groningen, Netherlands.

Classifications MeSH