Professional home care and the objective care burden for family caregivers of persons with spinal cord injury: Cross sectional survey.
Cross-sectional survey
Family caregiver
Professional home care
Spinal cord injury
Journal
International journal of nursing studies advances
ISSN: 2666-142X
Titre abrégé: Int J Nurs Stud Adv
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101769252
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Nov 2021
Nov 2021
Historique:
received:
17
07
2020
revised:
01
11
2020
accepted:
04
12
2020
medline:
11
12
2020
pubmed:
11
12
2020
entrez:
15
5
2024
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Spinal cord injury imposes high demands on family caregivers providing long-term care. Professional home care has been suggested for family caregivers' relief. However, it is not clear whether professional home care can achieve the goal of relieving family caregivers. To quantify to what extent professional home care was used as a relief or replacement for family caregivers, using the case of care for persons with spinal cord injury in Switzerland. Cross-sectional survey. Community setting in Switzerland. 717 family caregivers of persons with spinal cord injury living at home. Linear regression analyses were applied to investigate the relationship between care hours by family caregivers and the use of professional home care. Percentages of family caregivers that assisted in different tasks, and their time investment in the tasks, were contrasted between those with and without professional home care. Multiple logistic regression compared the likelihood of specific tasks being assisted by family caregivers dependent on whether professional home care was in place. The reasons given for not hiring more professional home care despite unmet needs were described with relative frequencies. Adjusted for non-utilization, care hours of family caregivers had a positive, but insignificant, relationship with the hours of professional home care (Coef. = 0.21, 95% CI: -0.05-0.47). Assistance in activities of daily living was more frequent in family caregivers with professional home care. Eating and drinking assistance was provided by 47% of family caregivers with professional home care (versus 18% of those without professional home care). The most frequent task in instrumental activities of daily living was housekeeping (88% of family caregivers with professional home care and 83% of those without professional home care). After adjusting for characteristics of the caregivers and care recipients, significantly lower odds of assistance were found in washing feet (OR 0.39, 95% CI: 0.22-0.71), transferring to the toilet or bathtub (OR 0.53, 95% CI: 0.29-0.96), and climbing stairs (OR 0.26, 95% CI: 0.09-0.69). Higher odds of assistance were found in respiratory care (OR 2.22, 95% CI: 1.04-4.74) and bladder management (OR 1.99, 95% CI: 1.05-3.76) with professional home care in place. No significant difference was found in other tasks. Professional home care is a strong support to caregivers in high care demand situations, but it is not a replacement. The present study recommends further relief, empowerment, and acknowledgement for family caregivers.
Sections du résumé
Background
UNASSIGNED
Spinal cord injury imposes high demands on family caregivers providing long-term care. Professional home care has been suggested for family caregivers' relief. However, it is not clear whether professional home care can achieve the goal of relieving family caregivers.
Objective
UNASSIGNED
To quantify to what extent professional home care was used as a relief or replacement for family caregivers, using the case of care for persons with spinal cord injury in Switzerland.
Design
UNASSIGNED
Cross-sectional survey.
Setting
UNASSIGNED
Community setting in Switzerland.
Participants
UNASSIGNED
717 family caregivers of persons with spinal cord injury living at home.
Methods
UNASSIGNED
Linear regression analyses were applied to investigate the relationship between care hours by family caregivers and the use of professional home care. Percentages of family caregivers that assisted in different tasks, and their time investment in the tasks, were contrasted between those with and without professional home care. Multiple logistic regression compared the likelihood of specific tasks being assisted by family caregivers dependent on whether professional home care was in place. The reasons given for not hiring more professional home care despite unmet needs were described with relative frequencies.
Results
UNASSIGNED
Adjusted for non-utilization, care hours of family caregivers had a positive, but insignificant, relationship with the hours of professional home care (Coef. = 0.21, 95% CI: -0.05-0.47). Assistance in activities of daily living was more frequent in family caregivers with professional home care. Eating and drinking assistance was provided by 47% of family caregivers with professional home care (versus 18% of those without professional home care). The most frequent task in instrumental activities of daily living was housekeeping (88% of family caregivers with professional home care and 83% of those without professional home care). After adjusting for characteristics of the caregivers and care recipients, significantly lower odds of assistance were found in washing feet (OR 0.39, 95% CI: 0.22-0.71), transferring to the toilet or bathtub (OR 0.53, 95% CI: 0.29-0.96), and climbing stairs (OR 0.26, 95% CI: 0.09-0.69). Higher odds of assistance were found in respiratory care (OR 2.22, 95% CI: 1.04-4.74) and bladder management (OR 1.99, 95% CI: 1.05-3.76) with professional home care in place. No significant difference was found in other tasks.
Conclusion
UNASSIGNED
Professional home care is a strong support to caregivers in high care demand situations, but it is not a replacement. The present study recommends further relief, empowerment, and acknowledgement for family caregivers.
Identifiants
pubmed: 38746708
doi: 10.1016/j.ijnsa.2020.100014
pii: S2666-142X(20)30013-8
pmc: PMC11080444
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
100014Informations de copyright
© 2020 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
All authors were salaried by organizations financially compensated by the Swiss Paraplegic Foundation.