Professional home care and the objective care burden for family caregivers of persons with spinal cord injury: Cross sectional survey.

Cross-sectional survey Family caregiver Professional home care Spinal cord injury

Journal

International journal of nursing studies advances
ISSN: 2666-142X
Titre abrégé: Int J Nurs Stud Adv
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101769252

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Nov 2021
Historique:
received: 17 07 2020
revised: 01 11 2020
accepted: 04 12 2020
medline: 11 12 2020
pubmed: 11 12 2020
entrez: 15 5 2024
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Spinal cord injury imposes high demands on family caregivers providing long-term care. Professional home care has been suggested for family caregivers' relief. However, it is not clear whether professional home care can achieve the goal of relieving family caregivers. To quantify to what extent professional home care was used as a relief or replacement for family caregivers, using the case of care for persons with spinal cord injury in Switzerland. Cross-sectional survey. Community setting in Switzerland. 717 family caregivers of persons with spinal cord injury living at home. Linear regression analyses were applied to investigate the relationship between care hours by family caregivers and the use of professional home care. Percentages of family caregivers that assisted in different tasks, and their time investment in the tasks, were contrasted between those with and without professional home care. Multiple logistic regression compared the likelihood of specific tasks being assisted by family caregivers dependent on whether professional home care was in place. The reasons given for not hiring more professional home care despite unmet needs were described with relative frequencies. Adjusted for non-utilization, care hours of family caregivers had a positive, but insignificant, relationship with the hours of professional home care (Coef. = 0.21, 95% CI: -0.05-0.47). Assistance in activities of daily living was more frequent in family caregivers with professional home care. Eating and drinking assistance was provided by 47% of family caregivers with professional home care (versus 18% of those without professional home care). The most frequent task in instrumental activities of daily living was housekeeping (88% of family caregivers with professional home care and 83% of those without professional home care). After adjusting for characteristics of the caregivers and care recipients, significantly lower odds of assistance were found in washing feet (OR 0.39, 95% CI: 0.22-0.71), transferring to the toilet or bathtub (OR 0.53, 95% CI: 0.29-0.96), and climbing stairs (OR 0.26, 95% CI: 0.09-0.69). Higher odds of assistance were found in respiratory care (OR 2.22, 95% CI: 1.04-4.74) and bladder management (OR 1.99, 95% CI: 1.05-3.76) with professional home care in place. No significant difference was found in other tasks. Professional home care is a strong support to caregivers in high care demand situations, but it is not a replacement. The present study recommends further relief, empowerment, and acknowledgement for family caregivers.

Sections du résumé

Background UNASSIGNED
Spinal cord injury imposes high demands on family caregivers providing long-term care. Professional home care has been suggested for family caregivers' relief. However, it is not clear whether professional home care can achieve the goal of relieving family caregivers.
Objective UNASSIGNED
To quantify to what extent professional home care was used as a relief or replacement for family caregivers, using the case of care for persons with spinal cord injury in Switzerland.
Design UNASSIGNED
Cross-sectional survey.
Setting UNASSIGNED
Community setting in Switzerland.
Participants UNASSIGNED
717 family caregivers of persons with spinal cord injury living at home.
Methods UNASSIGNED
Linear regression analyses were applied to investigate the relationship between care hours by family caregivers and the use of professional home care. Percentages of family caregivers that assisted in different tasks, and their time investment in the tasks, were contrasted between those with and without professional home care. Multiple logistic regression compared the likelihood of specific tasks being assisted by family caregivers dependent on whether professional home care was in place. The reasons given for not hiring more professional home care despite unmet needs were described with relative frequencies.
Results UNASSIGNED
Adjusted for non-utilization, care hours of family caregivers had a positive, but insignificant, relationship with the hours of professional home care (Coef. = 0.21, 95% CI: -0.05-0.47). Assistance in activities of daily living was more frequent in family caregivers with professional home care. Eating and drinking assistance was provided by 47% of family caregivers with professional home care (versus 18% of those without professional home care). The most frequent task in instrumental activities of daily living was housekeeping (88% of family caregivers with professional home care and 83% of those without professional home care). After adjusting for characteristics of the caregivers and care recipients, significantly lower odds of assistance were found in washing feet (OR 0.39, 95% CI: 0.22-0.71), transferring to the toilet or bathtub (OR 0.53, 95% CI: 0.29-0.96), and climbing stairs (OR 0.26, 95% CI: 0.09-0.69). Higher odds of assistance were found in respiratory care (OR 2.22, 95% CI: 1.04-4.74) and bladder management (OR 1.99, 95% CI: 1.05-3.76) with professional home care in place. No significant difference was found in other tasks.
Conclusion UNASSIGNED
Professional home care is a strong support to caregivers in high care demand situations, but it is not a replacement. The present study recommends further relief, empowerment, and acknowledgement for family caregivers.

Identifiants

pubmed: 38746708
doi: 10.1016/j.ijnsa.2020.100014
pii: S2666-142X(20)30013-8
pmc: PMC11080444
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

100014

Informations de copyright

© 2020 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

All authors were salaried by organizations financially compensated by the Swiss Paraplegic Foundation.

Auteurs

Jianan Huang (J)

Rehabilitation Services and Care Unit, Swiss Paraplegic Research, Guido A Zäch Strasse 4, 6207 Nottwil, Switzerland.
Department of Health Sciences and Medicine, University of Lucerne, Lucerne, Switzerland.

Diana Pacheco Barzallo (D)

Rehabilitation Services and Care Unit, Swiss Paraplegic Research, Guido A Zäch Strasse 4, 6207 Nottwil, Switzerland.
Department of Health Sciences and Medicine, University of Lucerne, Lucerne, Switzerland.

Sara Rubinelli (S)

Rehabilitation Services and Care Unit, Swiss Paraplegic Research, Guido A Zäch Strasse 4, 6207 Nottwil, Switzerland.
Department of Health Sciences and Medicine, University of Lucerne, Lucerne, Switzerland.

Nadja Münzel (N)

ParaHelp, Nottwil, Switzerland.

Mirjam Brach (M)

Rehabilitation Services and Care Unit, Swiss Paraplegic Research, Guido A Zäch Strasse 4, 6207 Nottwil, Switzerland.
Department of Health Sciences and Medicine, University of Lucerne, Lucerne, Switzerland.

Armin Gemperli (A)

Rehabilitation Services and Care Unit, Swiss Paraplegic Research, Guido A Zäch Strasse 4, 6207 Nottwil, Switzerland.
Department of Health Sciences and Medicine, University of Lucerne, Lucerne, Switzerland.

Classifications MeSH