Patients' perioperative experiences of an opioid-free versus opioid-based care pathway for laparoscopic bariatric surgery: A qualitative study.

Bariatric surgery Nursing research Opioid-free anaesthesia Patient experience Perioperative care

Journal

International journal of nursing studies advances
ISSN: 2666-142X
Titre abrégé: Int J Nurs Stud Adv
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101769252

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Jun 2024
Historique:
received: 27 11 2023
revised: 10 04 2024
accepted: 19 04 2024
medline: 15 5 2024
pubmed: 15 5 2024
entrez: 15 5 2024
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Despite recent evidence supporting the adoption of opioid-free anaesthetic and analgesic alternatives in the perioperative context, opioid-based regimens remain standard of care. There is limited knowledge about the patients' perioperative experiences of bariatric surgery, with no study yet investigating their experiences within an opioid-free care pathway. We aimed to describe similarities and differences in patients' perioperative experiences of undergoing bariatric surgery with either an opioid-free or opioid-based care pathway. A qualitative interview study. A strategic sample of patients enrolled in an ongoing randomized controlled trial investigating the effects of opioid-free anaesthesia for bariatric surgery were recruited. In the randomized controlled trial, participants were randomized to either opioid-based anaesthesia or opioid-free anaesthesia, including transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation as primary postoperative pain management. Twenty patients were interviewed 3 months after surgery: 10 participants in the opioid-free group versus 10 in the opioid-based group. Semi-structured interviews were conducted between December 2020 and February 2022 and analysed with qualitative content analysis. The analysis yielded four categories and 12 subcategories. In Category 1, participants shared We highlighted the overall similarities in perioperative experiences of patients undergoing bariatric surgery. However, the differences in experiences during opioid-free anaesthesia induction need to be addressed in further implementation and research studies investigating strategies to reduce the sense of loss of control. More research is needed to facilitate the implementation of opioid-free treatment strategies into clinical practice and improve the patient care experience.

Sections du résumé

Background UNASSIGNED
Despite recent evidence supporting the adoption of opioid-free anaesthetic and analgesic alternatives in the perioperative context, opioid-based regimens remain standard of care. There is limited knowledge about the patients' perioperative experiences of bariatric surgery, with no study yet investigating their experiences within an opioid-free care pathway.
Objective UNASSIGNED
We aimed to describe similarities and differences in patients' perioperative experiences of undergoing bariatric surgery with either an opioid-free or opioid-based care pathway.
Design UNASSIGNED
A qualitative interview study.
Setting UNASSIGNED
A strategic sample of patients enrolled in an ongoing randomized controlled trial investigating the effects of opioid-free anaesthesia for bariatric surgery were recruited. In the randomized controlled trial, participants were randomized to either opioid-based anaesthesia or opioid-free anaesthesia, including transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation as primary postoperative pain management.
Participants UNASSIGNED
Twenty patients were interviewed 3 months after surgery: 10 participants in the opioid-free group versus 10 in the opioid-based group.
Methods UNASSIGNED
Semi-structured interviews were conducted between December 2020 and February 2022 and analysed with qualitative content analysis.
Results UNASSIGNED
The analysis yielded four categories and 12 subcategories. In Category 1, participants shared
Conclusions UNASSIGNED
We highlighted the overall similarities in perioperative experiences of patients undergoing bariatric surgery. However, the differences in experiences during opioid-free anaesthesia induction need to be addressed in further implementation and research studies investigating strategies to reduce the sense of loss of control. More research is needed to facilitate the implementation of opioid-free treatment strategies into clinical practice and improve the patient care experience.

Identifiants

pubmed: 38746814
doi: 10.1016/j.ijnsa.2024.100201
pii: S2666-142X(24)00028-6
pmc: PMC11080373
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

100201

Informations de copyright

© 2024 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Auteurs

Alexander Olausson (A)

Institute of Health and Care Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Sweden.

Eva Angelini (E)

Institute of Health and Care Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Sweden.

Birgit Heckemann (B)

Institute of Health and Care Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Sweden.
Sahlgrenska University Hospital/Östra, Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Gothenburg, Sweden.

Paulin Andréll (P)

Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Institute of Clinical Sciences at Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Sweden.
Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine/Pain Centre, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Region Västra Götaland, Gothenburg, Sweden.

Pether Jildenstål (P)

Institute of Health and Care Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Sweden.
Department of Health Sciences, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.
Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, Örebro University Hospital and School of Medical Sciences, Örebro University, Örebro, Sweden.

Sven-Egron Thörn (SE)

Sahlgrenska University Hospital/Östra, Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Gothenburg, Sweden.

Axel Wolf (A)

Institute of Health and Care Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Sweden.
Sahlgrenska University Hospital/Östra, Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Institute of Nursing and Health Promotion, Oslo Metropolitan University, Oslo, Norway.
Centre for Person-Centred Care (GPCC), University of Gothenburg, Sweden.

Classifications MeSH