Outcomes of Non-Penetrating versus Penetrating Deep Sclerectomy in Open-Angle Glaucoma.


Journal

Journal of glaucoma
ISSN: 1536-481X
Titre abrégé: J Glaucoma
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 9300903

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
16 May 2024
Historique:
received: 30 08 2023
accepted: 27 04 2024
medline: 15 5 2024
pubmed: 15 5 2024
entrez: 15 5 2024
Statut: aheadofprint

Résumé

In this retrospective study, Non-Penetrating-Deep-Sclerectomy and Penetrating-Deep-Sclerectomy interventions showed similar >90% complete success rates at one-year post-surgery. However, Non-Penetrating-Deep-Sclerectomy achieved a superior safety profile in terms of best-corrected visual acuity recovery and rates of post-surgical complications. Comparing the surgical outcomes of two surgical techniques: non-penetrating deep sclerectomy (NPDS) and penetrating deep sclerectomy (PDS). This was a retrospective, longitudinal, comparative study including 66 eyes from 57 patients aged 69±9 years who underwent either NPDS or PDS for medically uncontrolled open-angle glaucoma. Outcome measurements included intraocular pressure (IOP), best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), rates of complications, post-operative corrective interventions and glaucoma medications at baseline and at all post-operative appointments up to 1 year. An exploratory mixed-effects model was used to assess the intergroup differences for IOP and BCVA. One-year post-surgery, similar significant IOP reduction from baseline were observed in NPDS (from 19,9±1.3 to 11.5±0.9 mmHg, P<0.001) and PDS (from 19,5±1,1 to 10.7±0.6 mmHg, P<0.001). A conservative complete success rate (defined as medicated IOP ≤16 mmHg and ≥20% reduction in IOP) was of 87% for NPDS and 97% for PDS. No BCVA changes were observed between baseline and 1-year post-surgery in both groups, and glaucoma medications showed a similar 10-fold reduction in both groups (P<0.001 vs. baseline). However, a significant difference in the speed of post-operative BVCA recovery was observed between NPDS and PDS (P<0.01), NPDS showing a faster recovery. Moreover, lower numbers of post-surgical complication and post-operative interventions were observed following NPDS compared to PDS (NPDS n=30 and 34 vs. PDS n=80 and 48 (P<0.05), respectively). The present study confirmed that both NPDS and PDS are highly effective surgical interventions for the management of primary open angle glaucoma. However, NPDS had a superior safety profile, in terms of BCVA recovery, complication rates and post-operative interventions.

Identifiants

pubmed: 38747719
doi: 10.1097/IJG.0000000000002421
pii: 00061198-990000000-00394
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2024 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

Financial disclosure: The authors declare no financial or other conflicts of interest.

Auteurs

Francesco Giorgio Giulio Merlo Pich (FGG)

Ophthalmology Resident, Swiss Visio Montchoisi Clinic - Lausanne, Vaud, Switzerland.

Leandro Oliverio (L)

FEBO in Ophthalmology and Ophthalmic Surgery, Head of Clinic of Medical and Surgical Glaucoma Unit - Swiss Visio Montchoisi Clinic, Avenue de Servan 38, 1006 Lausanne, Vaud, Switzerland.

Kevin Gillmann (K)

Glaucoma Specialist and Medical Director at Genève Ophtalmologie - Geneva, Switzerland.

André Mermoud (A)

FEBO in Ophthalmology and Ophthalmic Surgery, Director of Medical and Surgical Glaucoma Unit, Swiss Visio Montchoisi Clinic - Lausanne, Vaud, Switzerland.

Classifications MeSH