A qualitative narrative study of rescue and recovery workers responding to the terrorist bombing of Oklahoma City's Murrah Building.

Much of disaster mental health research uses quantitative methods, focusing on numerical prevalence, services, and outcomes. Qualitative methods can provide more detailed, rich, and spontaneous insights into personal disaster experiences, yielding important insights beyond deductive methods. This large-scale qualitative narrative study examined experiences of 181 OKC bombing rescue/recovery workers. Thematic narrative content of the bombing experience arose from personal accounts of the bomb blast by rescue/recovery workers proceeding chronologically from initial awareness and deployment to harrowing onsite search and rescue/recovery missions to the aftermath with reflections on the bombing. Beyond disaster recovery/rescue worker stories published in popular media, little other substantive published knowledge on this topic is available, and therefore this research study provides a wealth of new in-depth information that can provide guidance for policy and practice for disaster response.

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2024 American College of Occupational and Environmental Medicine.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

Conflict of Interest. None declared.