Patient-reported pain and physical health for acupuncture and chiropractic care delivered by Veterans Affairs versus community providers.


Journal

PloS one
ISSN: 1932-6203
Titre abrégé: PLoS One
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101285081

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
2024
Historique:
received: 06 02 2024
accepted: 26 04 2024
medline: 15 5 2024
pubmed: 15 5 2024
entrez: 15 5 2024
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Acupuncture and chiropractic care are evidence-based pain management alternatives to opioids. The Veterans Health Administration (VA) provides this care in some VA facilities, but also refers patients to community providers. We aimed to determine if patient-reported outcomes differ for acupuncture and chiropractic care from VA versus community providers. We conducted an observational study using survey outcome data and electronic medical record utilization data for acupuncture and chiropractic care provided in 18 VA facilities or in community facilities reimbursed by VA. Study participants were users of VA primary care, mental health, pain clinic, complementary and integrative therapies, coaching or education services in 2018-2019. Patients received 1) 4+ acupuncture visits (N = 201) or 4+ chiropractic care visits (N = 178) from a VA or community provider from 60 days prior to baseline to six-months survey and 2) no acupuncture or chiropractic visits from 1 year to 60 days prior to baseline. Outcomes measured included patient-reported pain (PEG) and physical health (PROMIS) at baseline and six-month surveys. Multivariate analyses examined outcomes at six months, adjusting for baseline outcomes and demographics. In unadjusted analyses, pain and physical health improved for patients receiving community-based acupuncture, while VA-based acupuncture patients experienced no change. Unadjusted analyses also showed improvements in physical health, but not pain, for patients receiving VA-based chiropractic care, with no changes for community-based chiropractic care patients. Using multivariate models, VA-based acupuncture was no different from community-based acupuncture for pain (-0.258, p = 0.172) or physical health (0.539, p = 0.399). Similarly, there were no differences between VA- and community-based chiropractic care in pain (-0.273, p = 0.154) or physical health (0.793, p = 0.191). Acupuncture and chiropractic care were associated with modest improvements at six months, with no meaningful differences between VA and community providers. The choice to receive care from VA or community providers could be based on factors other than quality, like cost or convenience.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
Acupuncture and chiropractic care are evidence-based pain management alternatives to opioids. The Veterans Health Administration (VA) provides this care in some VA facilities, but also refers patients to community providers. We aimed to determine if patient-reported outcomes differ for acupuncture and chiropractic care from VA versus community providers.
MATERIALS AND METHODS METHODS
We conducted an observational study using survey outcome data and electronic medical record utilization data for acupuncture and chiropractic care provided in 18 VA facilities or in community facilities reimbursed by VA. Study participants were users of VA primary care, mental health, pain clinic, complementary and integrative therapies, coaching or education services in 2018-2019. Patients received 1) 4+ acupuncture visits (N = 201) or 4+ chiropractic care visits (N = 178) from a VA or community provider from 60 days prior to baseline to six-months survey and 2) no acupuncture or chiropractic visits from 1 year to 60 days prior to baseline. Outcomes measured included patient-reported pain (PEG) and physical health (PROMIS) at baseline and six-month surveys. Multivariate analyses examined outcomes at six months, adjusting for baseline outcomes and demographics.
RESULTS RESULTS
In unadjusted analyses, pain and physical health improved for patients receiving community-based acupuncture, while VA-based acupuncture patients experienced no change. Unadjusted analyses also showed improvements in physical health, but not pain, for patients receiving VA-based chiropractic care, with no changes for community-based chiropractic care patients. Using multivariate models, VA-based acupuncture was no different from community-based acupuncture for pain (-0.258, p = 0.172) or physical health (0.539, p = 0.399). Similarly, there were no differences between VA- and community-based chiropractic care in pain (-0.273, p = 0.154) or physical health (0.793, p = 0.191).
CONCLUSIONS CONCLUSIONS
Acupuncture and chiropractic care were associated with modest improvements at six months, with no meaningful differences between VA and community providers. The choice to receive care from VA or community providers could be based on factors other than quality, like cost or convenience.

Identifiants

pubmed: 38748671
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0303651
pii: PONE-D-24-02440
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article Observational Study

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

e0303651

Informations de copyright

Copyright: This is an open access article, free of all copyright, and may be freely reproduced, distributed, transmitted, modified, built upon, or otherwise used by anyone for any lawful purpose. The work is made available under the Creative Commons CC0 public domain dedication.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Auteurs

Claire E O'Hanlon (CE)

Veterans Affairs Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System, Center for the Study of Healthcare Innovation, Implementation & Policy (CSHIIP), Los Angeles, California, United States of America.
RAND Corporation, Santa Monica, California, United States of America.

Steven B Zeliadt (SB)

Veterans Affairs Puget Sound Health Care System, VA Center of Innovation for Veteran-Centered and Value-Driven Care, Seattle, Washington, United States of America.
Department of Health Systems and Population Health, Hans Rosling Center for Population Health, University of Washington School of Public Health, Seattle, Washington, United States of America.

Rian DeFaccio (R)

Veterans Affairs Puget Sound Health Care System, VA Center of Innovation for Veteran-Centered and Value-Driven Care, Seattle, Washington, United States of America.

Lauren Gaj (L)

VA Bedford Healthcare System, Center for Healthcare Organization and Implementation Research (CHOIR), Bedford, Massachusetts, United States of America.

Barbara G Bokhour (BG)

VA Bedford Healthcare System, Center for Healthcare Organization and Implementation Research (CHOIR), Bedford, Massachusetts, United States of America.
Division of Preventive and Behavioral Medicine, Department of Population and Quantitative Health Sciences, University of Massachusetts Chan Medical School, Worcester, Massachusetts, United States of America.

Stephanie L Taylor (SL)

Veterans Affairs Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System, Center for the Study of Healthcare Innovation, Implementation & Policy (CSHIIP), Los Angeles, California, United States of America.
Department of Health Policy and Management, Fielding School of Public Health, Los Angeles, California, United States of America.
Department of Medicine, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, California, United States of America.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH