Management of perforations during endoscopic resection.
Cancer
Colonoscopy
Innovation
Screening
Technology
Journal
Best practice & research. Clinical gastroenterology
ISSN: 1532-1916
Titre abrégé: Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol
Pays: Netherlands
ID NLM: 101120605
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Mar 2024
Mar 2024
Historique:
received:
09
12
2023
revised:
02
02
2024
accepted:
25
02
2024
medline:
16
5
2024
pubmed:
16
5
2024
entrez:
15
5
2024
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Despite the evolution in tools and techniques, perforation is still one of the most pernicious adverse events of therapeutic endoscopy with potentially huge consequences. As advanced endoscopic resection techniques are worldwide spreading, endoscopists must be ready to manage intraprocedural perforations. In fact, immediate endoscopic closure through a prompt diagnosis represents the first-line option, saving patients from surgery, long hospitalizations and worse outcomes. Traditional and novel endoscopic closure modalities, including clips, suturing devices, stents and vacuum therapy, are increasingly expanding the therapeutic armamentarium for closing these defects. Nevertheless, available literature on this topic is currently limited. In this review our goal is to give an overview on the management of perforations occurring during endoscopic resections, with particular attention to characteristics, advantages, disadvantages and new horizons of endoscopic closure tools.
Identifiants
pubmed: 38749581
pii: S1521-6918(24)00019-2
doi: 10.1016/j.bpg.2024.101900
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Review
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
101900Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Declaration of competing interest Cesare Hassan:Fujifilm Co. (consultancy); Medtronic Co. (consultancy), Alessandro Repici: Fujifilm Co. (consultancy); Olympus Corp (consultancy); Medtronic Co. (consultancy); Roberta Maselli: Fujifilm Co. (speaking honorarium). Other authors have no conflict of interest to disclose.