Real-World Outcomes of Carotid Artery Stenting in Symptomatic and Asymptomatic Patients With Carotid Artery Stenosis.
Humans
Carotid Stenosis
/ diagnostic imaging
Male
Female
Aged
Retrospective Studies
Registries
Stents
Treatment Outcome
Asymptomatic Diseases
Time Factors
Risk Factors
Japan
Aged, 80 and over
Risk Assessment
Middle Aged
Endovascular Procedures
/ adverse effects
Ischemic Stroke
/ mortality
Intracranial Hemorrhages
/ etiology
asymptomatic
carotid artery stenosis
carotid artery stenting
complication
outcome
symptomatic
Journal
JACC. Cardiovascular interventions
ISSN: 1876-7605
Titre abrégé: JACC Cardiovasc Interv
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101467004
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
13 May 2024
13 May 2024
Historique:
received:
10
12
2023
revised:
15
02
2024
accepted:
12
03
2024
medline:
16
5
2024
pubmed:
16
5
2024
entrez:
15
5
2024
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
The effectiveness and safety of carotid artery stenting (CAS) are comparable to those of carotid endarterectomy in both symptomatic and asymptomatic patients with carotid artery stenosis, but real-world outcomes are not well-known. The purpose of this study was to investigate the real-world clinical outcomes of CAS in symptomatic and asymptomatic patients with carotid artery stenosis. We conducted a nationwide retrospective registry study of 156 centers between January 2015 and December 2019. We enrolled consecutive patients with CAS managed by certified specialists from the Japanese Society of Neuroendovascular Therapy. Outcomes between symptomatic and asymptomatic patients were compared. The primary outcome was a composite of ischemic stroke and all-cause death at 30 days after CAS. Secondary outcomes were ischemic stroke, all-cause death, intracranial hemorrhage (ICH), and procedural complications. We analyzed 9,792 patients (symptomatic, n = 5,351; asymptomatic, n = 4,441). The mean age was 73.5 years, and men were dominant (86.4%). Embolism protection devices were used in 99% of patients. The primary outcome was not significantly different between the symptomatic and asymptomatic groups (120 [2.2%] vs 65 [1.5%]; adjusted OR: 1.30; 95% CI: 0.92-1.83). The incidences of symptomatic ICH, any ICH, acute in-stent occlusion, and hyperperfusion syndrome were significantly more prevalent in the symptomatic group (47 [0.9%] vs 8 [0.2%], aOR: 4.41 [95% CI: 1.68-11.6]; 73 [1.4%] vs 12 [0.3%], aOR: 3.56 [95% CI: 1.71-7.39]; 45 [0.8%] vs 19 [0.4%], aOR: 2.18 [95% CI: 1.08-4.40]; and 102 [1.9%] vs 36 [0.8%], aOR: 1.78 [95% CI: 1.17-2.71], respectively). Other secondary outcomes were not significantly different between the 2 groups. The complication rate after specialist-involved CAS at 30 days was low in real-world practice.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
The effectiveness and safety of carotid artery stenting (CAS) are comparable to those of carotid endarterectomy in both symptomatic and asymptomatic patients with carotid artery stenosis, but real-world outcomes are not well-known.
OBJECTIVES
OBJECTIVE
The purpose of this study was to investigate the real-world clinical outcomes of CAS in symptomatic and asymptomatic patients with carotid artery stenosis.
METHODS
METHODS
We conducted a nationwide retrospective registry study of 156 centers between January 2015 and December 2019. We enrolled consecutive patients with CAS managed by certified specialists from the Japanese Society of Neuroendovascular Therapy. Outcomes between symptomatic and asymptomatic patients were compared. The primary outcome was a composite of ischemic stroke and all-cause death at 30 days after CAS. Secondary outcomes were ischemic stroke, all-cause death, intracranial hemorrhage (ICH), and procedural complications.
RESULTS
RESULTS
We analyzed 9,792 patients (symptomatic, n = 5,351; asymptomatic, n = 4,441). The mean age was 73.5 years, and men were dominant (86.4%). Embolism protection devices were used in 99% of patients. The primary outcome was not significantly different between the symptomatic and asymptomatic groups (120 [2.2%] vs 65 [1.5%]; adjusted OR: 1.30; 95% CI: 0.92-1.83). The incidences of symptomatic ICH, any ICH, acute in-stent occlusion, and hyperperfusion syndrome were significantly more prevalent in the symptomatic group (47 [0.9%] vs 8 [0.2%], aOR: 4.41 [95% CI: 1.68-11.6]; 73 [1.4%] vs 12 [0.3%], aOR: 3.56 [95% CI: 1.71-7.39]; 45 [0.8%] vs 19 [0.4%], aOR: 2.18 [95% CI: 1.08-4.40]; and 102 [1.9%] vs 36 [0.8%], aOR: 1.78 [95% CI: 1.17-2.71], respectively). Other secondary outcomes were not significantly different between the 2 groups.
CONCLUSIONS
CONCLUSIONS
The complication rate after specialist-involved CAS at 30 days was low in real-world practice.
Identifiants
pubmed: 38749596
pii: S1936-8798(24)00576-4
doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2024.03.014
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Multicenter Study
Comparative Study
Observational Study
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
1148-1159Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2024. Published by Elsevier Inc.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Funding Support and Author Disclosures This study was supported in part by a research grant from the Japanese Society of Neuroendovascular Therapy and the Kobayashi Foundation. Dr Uchida has received lecturer fees from Daiichi-Sankyo, Bristol Myers Squibb, Stryker, and Medtronic. Dr Sakakibara has received a manuscript fee from Medicus Shuppan. Dr N. Sakai has received a research grant from Biomedical Solutions, Medtronic, Terumo, and TG Medical; has received lecturer fees from Asahi-Intec, Biomedical Solutions, Daiichi-Sankyo, Kaneka, Medtronic, and Terumo; and has served on the Advisory Boards for Johnson & Johnson, Medtronic, and Terumo outside the submitted work. Dr Iihara has received a research grant from Idorsia Pharmaceutical Japan outside the submitted work. Dr Imamura has received lecturer fees from Medtronic, Daiichi Sankyo, Stryker, Johnson & Johnson, Terumo, and Asahi Intecc. Dr Ishii has received a research grant from Fuji Film; and has received lecture fees from Medtronic, Stryker, Terumo, and Johnson & Johnson. Dr Matsumaru has received lecturer fees from Medtronic, Stryker, Terumo, Kaneka, Biomedical Solution, E.P. Medical, B Braun, Daiichi-Sankyo, and Idorsia Pharmaceutical Japan outside of the submitted work. Dr Satow has received research grants from Canon Medical Systems; has received lecturer fees from Medtronic; and has received consulting fees from Kaneka Medix. Dr Yamada has received a research grant from the Terumo Life Science Foundation; and has received lecturer fees from Johnson & Johnson and Daiichi-Sankyo. Dr Shirakawa has received lecturer fees from Stryker, Terumo, Johnson & Johnson, and Medtronic. Dr Yoshimura has received research grants from Medico’s Hirata, Medtronic, and Terumo; and has received lecturer fees from Medtronic, Kaneka, Stryker, Daiichi-Sankyo, Bristol Myers Squibb, and Johnson & Johnson. Dr C. Sakai has reported that she has no relationships relevant to the contents of this paper to disclose.