Mental health workers' perspectives on the implementation of a peer support intervention in five countries: qualitative findings from the UPSIDES study.


Journal

BMJ open
ISSN: 2044-6055
Titre abrégé: BMJ Open
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101552874

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
15 May 2024
Historique:
medline: 16 5 2024
pubmed: 16 5 2024
entrez: 15 5 2024
Statut: epublish

Résumé

The introduction of peer support in mental health teams creates opportunities and challenges for both peer and non-peer staff. However, the majority of research on mental health workers' (MHWs) experiences with peer support comes from high-income countries. Using Peer Support In Developing Empowering Mental Health Services (UPSIDES) is an international multicentre study, which aims at scaling up peer support for people with severe mental illness in Europe, Asia and Africa. This study investigates MHWs experiences with UPSIDES peer support. Six focus groups with MHWs were conducted approximately 18 months after the implementation of the UPSIDES peer support intervention. Transcripts were analysed with a descriptive approach using thematic content analysis. Qualitative data were collected in Ulm and Hamburg (Germany), Butabika (Uganda), Dar es Salaam (Tanzania), Be'er Sheva (Israel) and Pune (India). 25 MHWs (19 females and 6 males) from UPSIDES study sites in the UPSIDES Trial (ISRCTN26008944) participated. Five overarching themes were identified in MHWs' discussions: MHWs valued peer support workers (PSWs) for sharing their lived experiences with service users (theme 1), gained trust in peer support over time (theme 2) and provided support to them (theme 3). Participants from lower-resource study sites reported additional benefits, including reduced workload. PSWs extending their roles beyond what MHWs perceived as appropriate was described as a challenge (theme 4). Perceptions about PSWs varied based on previous peer support experience, ranging from considering PSWs as equal team members to viewing them as service users (theme 5). Considering local context is essential in order to understand MHWs' views on the cooperation with PSWs. Especially in settings with less prior experience of peer support, implementers should make extra effort to promote interaction between MHWs and PSWs. In order to better understand the determinants of successful implementation of peer support in diverse settings, further research should investigate the impact of contextual factors (eg, resource availability and cultural values). ISRCTN26008944.

Identifiants

pubmed: 38749688
pii: bmjopen-2023-081963
doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-081963
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article Multicenter Study

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

e081963

Informations de copyright

© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2024. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

Competing interests: None declared.

Auteurs

Maria Hildegard Haun (MH)

Department of Psychiatry II, Ulm University, Ulm, Germany maria.haun@uni-ulm.de.

Selina Girit (S)

Department of Psychiatry II, Ulm University, Ulm, Germany.

Yael Goldfarb (Y)

Department of Social Work, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, Be'er-Sheva, Israel.

Jasmine Kalha (J)

Centre for Mental Health Law and Policy, Indian Law Society, Pune, India.

Palak Korde (P)

Centre for Mental Health Law and Policy, Indian Law Society, Pune, India.

Eric Kwebiiha (E)

Butabika National Referral Hospital, Kampala, Uganda.

Galia Moran (G)

Department of Social Work, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, Be'er-Sheva, Israel.

Rachel Mtei (R)

Department of Health Systems, Impact Evaluation and Policy, Ifakara Health Institute, Dar es Salaam, Tanzania.

Jackline Niwemuhwezi (J)

Department of Health Systems, Impact Evaluation and Policy, Ifakara Health Institute, Dar es Salaam, Tanzania.

Rebecca Nixdorf (R)

Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.

Lena Nugent (L)

Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.

Bernd Puschner (B)

Department of Psychiatry II, Ulm University, Ulm, Germany.

Mary Ramesh (M)

Department of Health Systems, Impact Evaluation and Policy, Ifakara Health Institute, Dar es Salaam, Tanzania.

Grace Kathryn Ryan (GK)

Centre for Global Mental Health, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK.

Mike Slade (M)

School of Health Sciences, Institute of Mental Health, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.

Ashleigh Charles (A)

School of Health Sciences, Institute of Mental Health, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.

Silvia Krumm (S)

Department of Psychiatry II, Ulm University, Ulm, Germany.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH