Experimental comparison of first-pass effect between direct thromboaspiration and combined thrombectomy in the setting of distal basilar occlusion.

Stroke basilar artery in-vitro techniques thrombectomy

Journal

Interventional neuroradiology : journal of peritherapeutic neuroradiology, surgical procedures and related neurosciences
ISSN: 2385-2011
Titre abrégé: Interv Neuroradiol
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 9602695

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
15 May 2024
Historique:
medline: 16 5 2024
pubmed: 16 5 2024
entrez: 16 5 2024
Statut: aheadofprint

Résumé

Studies investigating endovascular therapy in vertebro-basilar stroke have led to controversial results in the past, but recent randomized trials seem to show an effectiveness superiority of endovascular therapy versus best medical treatment. However, uncertainty remains concerning many aspects of thrombectomy in acute basilar artery occlusion, notably technical considerations. This study compared the first-pass effect of direct thromboaspiration and combined thrombectomy in the setting of distal basilar occlusion. An in-vitro experimental set-up was used, consisting of a vascular phantom model and thrombus analogs of different consistencies to mimic human clots. Thrombus analogs were injected into the model through the vertebral artery and flowed to the basilar distal third to mimic a distal basilar occlusion. Ten procedures were performed for each thrombus analog stiffness and technique (direct thromboaspiration versus combined thrombectomy). Direct thromboaspiration showed an overall first-pass effect rate of 83.3% (25/30) and was particularly effective for ultra-soft and soft clot analogs, but decreased for hard clot analogs. Combined thrombectomy had an overall first-pass effect rate of 56.7% (17/30). The effect rate for ultra-soft and soft clot analogs was 60% and 50% for hard clot analogs. In the softer clot analogs, the stent-retriever device used for the combined thrombectomies tended to deviate the clot analog from a co-axial trajectory with the aspiration catheter. In the context of distal basilar occlusion, our in-vitro results showed that higher first-pass effect rates were achieved with direct thromboaspiration compared to combined thrombectomy in all types of thrombus analogs.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
Studies investigating endovascular therapy in vertebro-basilar stroke have led to controversial results in the past, but recent randomized trials seem to show an effectiveness superiority of endovascular therapy versus best medical treatment. However, uncertainty remains concerning many aspects of thrombectomy in acute basilar artery occlusion, notably technical considerations. This study compared the first-pass effect of direct thromboaspiration and combined thrombectomy in the setting of distal basilar occlusion.
METHODS METHODS
An in-vitro experimental set-up was used, consisting of a vascular phantom model and thrombus analogs of different consistencies to mimic human clots. Thrombus analogs were injected into the model through the vertebral artery and flowed to the basilar distal third to mimic a distal basilar occlusion. Ten procedures were performed for each thrombus analog stiffness and technique (direct thromboaspiration versus combined thrombectomy).
RESULTS RESULTS
Direct thromboaspiration showed an overall first-pass effect rate of 83.3% (25/30) and was particularly effective for ultra-soft and soft clot analogs, but decreased for hard clot analogs. Combined thrombectomy had an overall first-pass effect rate of 56.7% (17/30). The effect rate for ultra-soft and soft clot analogs was 60% and 50% for hard clot analogs. In the softer clot analogs, the stent-retriever device used for the combined thrombectomies tended to deviate the clot analog from a co-axial trajectory with the aspiration catheter.
CONCLUSIONS CONCLUSIONS
In the context of distal basilar occlusion, our in-vitro results showed that higher first-pass effect rates were achieved with direct thromboaspiration compared to combined thrombectomy in all types of thrombus analogs.

Identifiants

pubmed: 38751100
doi: 10.1177/15910199241254412
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

15910199241254412

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

Declaration of conflicting interestsThe authors declared the following potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: PM is consultant for Medtronic and Stryker.

Auteurs

Reza Seiffert (R)

Division of Neuroradiology, Geneva University Hospitals, Geneva, Switzerland.
Division of Neuroradiology, University Hospital of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.

Olivier Brina (O)

Division of Neuroradiology, Geneva University Hospitals, Geneva, Switzerland.

Philippe Reymond (P)

Division of Neuroradiology, Geneva University Hospitals, Geneva, Switzerland.

Jeremy Hofmeister (J)

Division of Neuroradiology, Geneva University Hospitals, Geneva, Switzerland.

Gianmarco Bernava (G)

Division of Neuroradiology, Geneva University Hospitals, Geneva, Switzerland.

Andrea Rosi (A)

Division of Neuroradiology, Geneva University Hospitals, Geneva, Switzerland.

Lars Michels (L)

Division of Neuroradiology, University Hospital of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.

Zsolt Kulcsar (Z)

Division of Neuroradiology, University Hospital of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.

Karl-Olof Lovblad (KO)

Division of Neuroradiology, Geneva University Hospitals, Geneva, Switzerland.

Paolo Machi (P)

Division of Neuroradiology, Geneva University Hospitals, Geneva, Switzerland.

Classifications MeSH