A practical guide to bioimaging research data management in core facilities.
FAIR
OMERO
bioimaging
data stewardship
research data management
Journal
Journal of microscopy
ISSN: 1365-2818
Titre abrégé: J Microsc
Pays: England
ID NLM: 0204522
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
16 May 2024
16 May 2024
Historique:
revised:
29
04
2024
received:
09
04
2024
accepted:
30
04
2024
medline:
16
5
2024
pubmed:
16
5
2024
entrez:
16
5
2024
Statut:
aheadofprint
Résumé
Bioimage data are generated in diverse research fields throughout the life and biomedical sciences. Its potential for advancing scientific progress via modern, data-driven discovery approaches reaches beyond disciplinary borders. To fully exploit this potential, it is necessary to make bioimaging data, in general, multidimensional microscopy images and image series, FAIR, that is, findable, accessible, interoperable and reusable. These FAIR principles for research data management are now widely accepted in the scientific community and have been adopted by funding agencies, policymakers and publishers. To remain competitive and at the forefront of research, implementing the FAIR principles into daily routines is an essential but challenging task for researchers and research infrastructures. Imaging core facilities, well-established providers of access to imaging equipment and expertise, are in an excellent position to lead this transformation in bioimaging research data management. They are positioned at the intersection of research groups, IT infrastructure providers, the institution´s administration, and microscope vendors. In the frame of German BioImaging - Society for Microscopy and Image Analysis (GerBI-GMB), cross-institutional working groups and third-party funded projects were initiated in recent years to advance the bioimaging community's capability and capacity for FAIR bioimage data management. Here, we provide an imaging-core-facility-centric perspective outlining the experience and current strategies in Germany to facilitate the practical adoption of the FAIR principles closely aligned with the international bioimaging community. We highlight which tools and services are ready to be implemented and what the future directions for FAIR bioimage data have to offer.
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Subventions
Organisme : Funded by the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG, German Research Foundation)
ID : 462231789
Informations de copyright
© 2024 The Authors. Journal of Microscopy published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Royal Microscopical Society.
Références
Ferrando‐May, E., Hartmann, H., Reymann, J., Ansari, N., Utz, N., Fried, H.‐U., Kukat, C., Peychl, J., Liebig, C., Terjung, S., Laketa, V., Sporbert, A., Weidtkamp‐Peters, S., Schauss, A., Zuschratter, W., & Avilov, S. (2016). Advanced light microscopy core facilities: Balancing service, science and career. Microscopy Research and Technique, 79(6), 463–479. https://doi.org/10.1002/jemt.22648
Meder, D., Morales, M., Pepperkok, R., Schlapbach, R., Tiran, A., & Van Minnebruggen, G. (2016). Institutional core facilities: Prerequisite for breakthroughs in the life sciences: Core facilities play an increasingly important role in biomedical research by providing scientists access to sophisticated technology and expertise. Embo Reports, 17(8), 1088–1093. https://doi.org/10.15252/embr.201642857
Renaud, O., Aulner, N., Salles, A., Halidi, N., Brunstein, M., Mallet, A., Aumayr, K., Terjung, S., Levy, D., Lippens, S., Verbavatz, J.‐M., Heuser, T., Santarella‐Mellwig, R., Tinevez, J.‐Y., Woller, T., Botzki, A., Cawthorne, C., & Munck, S., The Core4Life Consortium. (2024). Staying on track – Keeping things running in a high‐end scientific imaging core facility. Journal of Microscopy, 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1111/jmi.13304
Kivinen, K., Van Luenen, H., Alcalay, M., Bock, C., Dodzian, J., Hoskova, K., Hoyle, D., Hradil, O., Christensen, S. K., Korn, B., Kosteas, T., Morales, M., Skowronek, K., Theodorou, V., Van Minnebruggen, G., Salamero, J., & Premvardhan, L. (2022). Acknowledging and citing core facilities: Key contributions to data lifecycle should be recognised in the scientific literature. Embo Reports, 23(9), e55734. https://doi.org/10.15252/embr.202255734
Kos‐Braun, I. C., Gerlach, B., & Pitzer, C. (2020). A survey of research quality in core facilities. Elife, 9, e62212. https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.62212
DeMaggio, S. (2002). Chapter 14 – Running and setting up a confocal microscope core facility. In B. Matsumoto (Ed.), Methods in cell biology (pp. 475–485). Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0091‐679X(02)70015‐0
Schmidt, C., Hanne, J., Moore, J., Meesters, C., Ferrando‐May, E., Weidtkamp‐Peters, S., &. Members of the NFDI4BIOIMAGE Initiative. (2022). Research data management for bioimaging: The 2021 NFDI4BIOIMAGE community survey. F1000Research, 11, 638. https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.121714.2
Imreh, G., Hu, J., & Le Guyader, S. (2023). Improving light microscopy training routines with evidence‐based education. Journal of Microscopy, n/a(n/a). https://doi.org/10.1111/jmi.13216
Wilkinson, M. D., Dumontier, M., Aalbersberg, I. J., Appleton, G., Axton, M., Baak, A., Blomberg, N., Boiten, J.‐W., Da Silva Santos, L. B., Bourne, P. E., Bouwman, J., Brookes, A. J., Clark, T., Crosas, M., Dillo, I., Dumon, O., Edmunds, S., Evelo, C. T., Finkers, R., …Mons, B. (2016). The FAIR Guiding Principles for scientific data management and stewardship. Scientific Data, 3, 160018. https://doi.org/10.1038/sdata.2016.18
Jacobsen, A., De Miranda Azevedo, R., Juty, N., Batista, D., Coles, S., Cornet, R., Courtot, M., Crosas, M., Dumontier, M., Evelo, C. T., Goble, C., Guizzardi, G., Hansen, K. K., Hasnain, A., Hettne, K., Heringa, J., Hooft, R. W. W., Imming, M., Jeffery, K. G., …Schultes, E. (2020). FAIR principles: Interpretations and implementation considerations. Data Intelligence, 2(1‐2), 10–29. https://doi.org/10.1162/dint_r_00024
Allan, C., Burel, J.‐M., Moore, J., Blackburn, C., Linkert, M., Loynton, S., Macdonald, D., Moore, W. J., Neves, C., Patterson, A., Porter, M., Tarkowska, A., Loranger, B., Avondo, J., Lagerstedt, I., Lianas, L., Leo, S., Hands, K., Hay, R. T., …Swedlow, J. R. (2012). OMERO: flexible, model‐driven data management for experimental biology. Nature Methods, 9(3), 245–253. https://doi.org/10.1038/nmeth.1896
Moore, J., Allan, C., Burel, J. M., Loranger, B., MacDonald, D., Monk, J., & Swedlow, J. R. (2008). Open tools for storage and management of quantitative image data. Methods in Cell Biology, 85, 555–570. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0091‐679X(08)85024‐8
Schmidt, C., Bortolomeazzi, M., Boissonnet, T., Dohle, J., Wernet, T., Hanne, J., Nitschke, R., Kunis, S., Bernhardt, K., Weidtkamp‐Peters, S., & Ferrando‐May, E. (2023). Bringing FAIR Bioimage Data Management into Practice: The Information Infrastructure for BioImage Data (I3D:bio) Project – bottom‐up Community Support for Microscopy Data Sharing and Preservation. In V. Heuveline, N. Bisheh, P. Kling (Eds.), E‐Science‐Tage 2023: Empower your research – Preserve your data (pp. 289–294). heiBOOKS. https://doi.org/10.11588/heibooks.1288.c18090
Schmidt, C., & Ferrando‐May, E. (2021) NFDI4BIOIMAGE – An initiative for a national research data infrastructure for microscopy data. In E‐Science‐Tage 2021: Share your Research Data. Heidelberg: heiBOOKS. https://doi.org/10.11588/heidok.00029489
Zaritsky, A. (2018). Sharing and reusing cell image data. Molecular Biology of the Cell, 29(11), 1274–1280. https://doi.org/10.1091/mbc.E17‐10‐0606
Higgins, S. (2008). The DCC curation lifecycle model. International Journal of Digital Curation, 3(1), 134–140. https://doi.org/10.2218/ijdc.v3i1.48
Griffin, P., Khadake, J., LeMay, K. S., Lewis, S. E., Orchard, S., Pask, A., Pope, B., Roessner, U., Russell, K., Seemann, T., Treloar, A., Tyagi, S., Christiansen, J. H., Dayalan, S., Gladman, S., Hangartner, S. B., Hayden, H. L., Ho, W. W. H., Keeble‐Gagnère, G., … Schneider, M. V. (2018). Best practice data life cycle approaches for the life sciences [version 2; peer review: 2 approved]. F1000Research, 6, 1618. https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.12344.2
Data sharing is the future. Nature Methods 2023, 20(4), 471–471. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41592‐023‐01865‐4
Wilson, S. L., Way, G. P., Bittremieux, W., Armache, J.‐P., Haendel, M. A., & Hoffman, M. M. (2021). Sharing biological data: Why, when, and how. FEBS Letters, 595(7), 847–863. https://doi.org/10.1002/1873‐3468.14067
Bagheri, N., Carpenter, A. E., Lundberg, E., Plant, A. L., & Horwitz, R. (2022). The new era of quantitative cell imaging – Challenges and opportunities. Molecular Cell, 82(2), 241–247. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molcel.2021.12.024
Swedlow, J. R., Kankaanpää, P., Sarkans, U., Goscinski, W., Galloway, G., Malacrida, L., Sullivan, R. P., Härtel, S., Brown, C. M., Wood, C., Keppler, A., Paina, F., Loos, B., Zullino, S., Longo, D. L., Aime, S., & Onami, S. (2021). A global view of standards for open image data formats and repositories. Nature Methods, 18(12), 1440–1446. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41592‐021‐01113‐7
Ouyang, W., & Zimmer, C. (2017). The imaging tsunami: Computational opportunities and challenges. Current Opinion in Systems Biology, 4, 105–113. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.coisb.2017.07.011
Pearson, H. (2007). The good, the bad and the ugly. Nature, 447(7141), 138–140. https://doi.org/10.1038/447138a
Lee, R. M., Eisenman, L. R., Khuon, S., Aaron, J. S., & Chew, T.‐L. (2024). Believing is seeing – The deceptive influence of bias in quantitative microscopy. Journal of Cell Science, 137(1), jcs261567. https://doi.org/10.1242/jcs.261567
Jost, A. P.‐T., & Waters, J. C. (2019). Designing a rigorous microscopy experiment: Validating methods and avoiding bias. Journal of Cell Biology, 218(5), 1452–1466. https://doi.org/10.1083/jcb.201812109
Pertusa, J. F., & Morante‐Redolat, J. M. (2019). Main steps in image processing and quantification: The analysis workflow. Methods in Molecular Biology, 2040, 3–21. https://doi.org/10.1007/978‐1‐4939‐9686‐5_1
D'Antuono, R. (2022). Basic digital image acquisition, design, processing, analysis, management, and presentation. In V. Nechyporuk‐Zloy (Ed.), Principles of light microscopy: From basic to advanced (pp. 77–104). Cham: Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978‐3‐031‐04477‐9_4
Wallace, C. T., St Croix, C. M., & Watkins, S. C. (2015). Data management and archiving in a large microscopy‐and‐imaging, multi‐user facility: Problems and solutions. Molecular Reproduction and Development, 82(9), 630–634. https://doi.org/10.1002/mrd.22538
Michener, W. K. (2015). Ten simple rules for creating a good data management plan. PLoS Computational Biology, 11(10), e1004525. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1004525
Hahnel, M., Smith, G., Schoenenberger, G., Scaplehorn, N., & Day, L. (2023). The state of open data 2023. Digital Science. https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.24428194.v1
Science Europe Practical Guide to the International Alignment of Research Data Management – Extended Edition, 2021. Zenodo, https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4915861
Hartley, M., Anita, L., Babalola, K., Russell, C., Yoldaş, A. K., & Zulueta‐Coarasa, T. (2023). Pictures at an exhibition: How to share your imaging data. Journal of Microscopy, Online ahead of print. https://doi.org/10.1111/jmi.13221
Hartley, M., Kleywegt, G. J., Patwardhan, A., Sarkans, U., Swedlow, J. R., & Brazma, A. (2022). The BioImage Archive – Building a home for life‐sciences microscopy data. Journal of Molecular Biology, 434(11), 167505. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmb.2022.167505
Ellenberg, J., Swedlow, J. R., Barlow, M., Cook, C. E., Sarkans, U., Patwardhan, A., Brazma, A., & Birney, E. (2018). A call for public archives for biological image data. Nature Methods, 15(11), 849–854. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41592‐018‐0195‐8
Kunis, S. (2022). Structuring of data and metadata in bioimaging: Concepts and technical Solutions in the Context of Linked Data. Zenodo. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7018929
Montero Llopis, P., Senft, R. A., Ross‐Elliott, T. J., Stephansky, R., Keeley, D. P., Koshar, P., Marqués, G., Gao, Y. S., Carlson, B. R., Pengo, T., Sanders, M. A., Cameron, L. A., & Itano, M. S. (2021). Best practices and tools for reporting reproducible fluorescence microscopy methods. Nature Methods, 18(12), 1463–1476. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41592‐021‐01156‐w
Sarkans, U., Chiu, W., Collinson, L., Darrow, M. C., Ellenberg, J., Grunwald, D., Hériché, J.‐K., Iudin, A., Martins, G. G., Meehan, T., Narayan, K., Patwardhan, A., Russell, M. R. G., Saibil, H. R., Strambio‐De‐Castillia, C., Swedlow, J. R., Tischer, C., Uhlmann, V., Verkade, P., …Brazma, A. (2021). REMBI: Recommended Metadata for Biological Images‐enabling reuse of microscopy data in biology. Nature Methods, 18, 1418–1422. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41592‐021‐01166‐8
Hammer, M., Huisman, M., Rigano, A., Boehm, U., Chambers, J. J., Gaudreault, N., North, A. J., Pimentel, J. A., Sudar, D., Bajcsy, P., Brown, C. M., Corbett, A. D., Faklaris, O., Lacoste, J., Laude, A., Nelson, G., Nitschke, R., Farzam, F., Smith, C. S., …Strambio‐De‐Castillia, C. (2021). Towards community‐driven metadata standards for light microscopy: Tiered specifications extending the OME model. Nature Methods, 18(12), 1427–1440. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41592‐021‐01327‐9
Schapiro, D., Yapp, C., Sokolov, A., Reynolds, S. M., Chen, Y.‐A., Sudar, D., Xie, Y., Muhlich, J., Arias‐Camison, R., Arena, S., Taylor, A. J., Nikolov, M., Tyler, M., Lin, J.‐R., Burlingame, E. A., Abravanel, D. L., Achilefu, S., Ademuyiwa, F. O., Dubinett, S. M., …Sorger, P. K. (2022). MITI minimum information guidelines for highly multiplexed tissue images. Nature Methods, 19(3), 262–267. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41592‐022‐01415‐4
Hosseini, R., Vlasveld, M., Willemse, J., Van De Water, B., Le Dévédec, S. E., & Wolstencroft, K. J. (2023). FAIR high content screening in bioimaging. Scientific Data, 10(1), 462. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41597‐023‐02367‐w
Ropelewski, A. J., Rizzo, M. A., Swedlow, J. R., Huisken, J., Osten, P., Khanjani, N., Weiss, K., Bakalov, V., Engle, M., Gridley, L., Krzyzanowski, M., Madden, T., Maiese, D., Mandal, M., Waterfield, J., Williams, D., Hamilton, C. M., & Huggins, W. (2022). Standard metadata for 3D microscopy. Scientific Data, 9(1), 449. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41597‐022‐01562‐5
Bourget, M.‐H., Kamentsky, L., Ghosh, S. S., Mazzamuto, G., Lazari, A., Markiewicz, C. J., Oostenveld, R., Niso, G., Halchenko, Y. O., Lipp, I., Takerkart, S., Toussaint, P.‐J., Khan, A. R., Nilsonne, G., Castelli, F. M., & Cohen‐Adad, J. (2022). Microscopy‐BIDS: An extension to the brain imaging data structure for microscopy data. Frontiers in Neuroscience, 16, 871228. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2022.871228
Kunis, S., Hänsch, S., Schmidt, C., Wong, F., Strambio‐De‐Castillia, C., & Weidtkamp‐Peters, S. (2021). MDEmic: A metadata annotation tool to facilitate management of FAIR image data in the bioimaging community. Nature Methods, 18(12), 1416–1417. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41592‐021‐01288‐z
Rigano, A., Ehmsen, S., Öztürk, S. U., Ryan, J., Balashov, A., Hammer, M., Kirli, K., Boehm, U., Brown, C. M., Bellve, K., Chambers, J. J., Cosolo, A., Coleman, R. A., Faklaris, O., Fogarty, K. E., Guilbert, T., Hamacher, A. B., Itano, M. S., Keeley, D. P., …Strambio‐De‐Castillia, C. (2021). Micro‐Meta App: An interactive tool for collecting microscopy metadata based on community specifications. Nature Methods, 18(12), 1489–1495. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41592‐021‐01315‐z
Ryan, J., Pengo, T., Rigano, A., Llopis, P. M., Itano, M. S., Cameron, L. A., Marqués, G., Strambio‐De‐Castillia, C., Sanders, M. A., & Brown, C. M. (2021). MethodsJ2: A software tool to capture metadata and generate comprehensive microscopy methods text. Nature Methods, 18(12), 1414–1416. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41592‐021‐01290‐5
Perrier, L., Blondal, E., & Macdonald, H. (2020). The views, perspectives, and experiences of academic researchers with data sharing and reuse: A meta‐synthesis. PLoS ONE, 15(2), e0229182. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0229182
Linkert, M., Rueden, C. T., Allan, C., Burel, J.‐M., Moore, W., Patterson, A., Loranger, B., Moore, J., Neves, C., Macdonald, D., Tarkowska, A., Sticco, C., Hill, E., Rossner, M., Eliceiri, K. W., & Swedlow, J. R. (2010). Metadata matters: access to image data in the real world. Journal of Cell Biology, 189(5), 777–782. https://doi.org/10.1083/jcb.201004104
Moore, J., Allan, C., Besson, S., Burel, J.‐M., Diel, E., Gault, D., Kozlowski, K., Lindner, D., Linkert, M., Manz, T., Moore, W., Pape, C., Tischer, C., & Swedlow, J. R. (2021). OME‐NGFF: A next‐generation file format for expanding bioimaging data‐access strategies. Nature Methods, 18(12), 1496–1498. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41592‐021‐01326‐w
Heddleston, J. M., Aaron, J. S., Khuon, S., & Chew, T.‐L. (2021). A guide to accurate reporting in digital image acquisition – Can anyone replicate your microscopy data? Journal of Cell Science, 134(6), jcs254144. https://doi.org/10.1242/jcs.254144
Petrak, L. J., & Waters, J. C. (2014). A practical guide to microscope care and maintenance. Methods in Cell Biology, 123, 55–76. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978‐0‐12‐420138‐5.00004‐5
Faklaris, O., Bancel‐Vallée, L., Dauphin, A., Monterroso, B., Frère, P., Geny, D., Manoliu, T., De Rossi, S., Cordelières, F. P., Schapman, D., Nitschke, R., Cau, J., & Guilbert, T. (2022). Quality assessment in light microscopy for routine use through simple tools and robust metrics. Journal of Cell Biology, 221(11), e202107093. https://doi.org/10.1083/jcb.202107093
Boehm, U., Nelson, G., Brown, C. M., Bagley, S., Bajcsy, P., Bischof, J., Dauphin, A., Dobbie, I. M., Eriksson, J. E., Faklaris, O., Fernandez‐Rodriguez, J., Ferrand, A., Gelman, L., Gheisari, A., Hartmann, H., Kukat, C., Laude, A., Mitkovski, M., Munck, S., …Nitschke, R. (2021). QUAREP‐LiMi: A community endeavor to advance quality assessment and reproducibility in light microscopy. Nature Methods, 18(12), 1423–1426. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41592‐021‐01162‐y
Marx, V. (2022). Imaging standards to ease reproducibility and the everyday. Nature Methods, 19(7), 784–788. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41592‐022‐01544‐w
Carvalho, M. T., Fried, H., Jarvis, S., Mitchell, C. A., Nitschke, R., van der Oord, K., Rühl, A., Schwartz, S., Spitaler, M., Zantl, R., & Seitz, A. (2023).Repeatability of the XY positioning of motorized xy‐tables of light microscopes. protocols.io. https://doi.org/10.17504/protocols.io.kxygxz2rdv8j/v1
Gaudreault, N., Bagley, S., Bammann, R. R., Barachati, F., Barna, L., Boczonadi, V., Boehm, U., Bosch, M., Brideau, C., Carvalho, M. T., Colarusso, P., Cole, R., Darwish‐Miranda, N., Duwé, S., Eismann, F., Faklaris, O., Felscher, A., Gonnert, … Gelman, L. (2023). Illumination Power, stability, and linearity measurements for confocal and widefield microscopes V.2. protocols.io. https://doi.org/10.17504/protocols.io.5jyl853ndl2w/v2
Deagle, R. C., Wee, T.‐L., & Brown, C. M. (2017). Reproducibility in light microscopy: Maintenance, standards and SOPs. International Journal of Biochemistry & Cell Biology, 89, 120–124. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocel.2017.06.008
Nechyporuk‐Zloy, V. (2022). Principles of light microscopy: From basic to advanced. Springer Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978‐3‐031‐04477‐9
Shaw, S. L., & Hinchcliffe, E. H. (2013). 65,000 shades of grey: Use of digital image files in light microscopy. Methods in Cell Biology, 114, 317–336. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978‐0‐12‐407761‐4.00013‐0
Larobina, M., & Murino, L. (2014). Medical image file formats. Journal of Digital Imaging, 27(2), 200–206. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10278‐013‐9657‐9
Andreev, A., & Koo, D. E. S. (2020). Practical guide to storage of large amounts of microscopy data. Microscopy Today, 28(4), 42–45. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1551929520001091
Moore, J., Basurto‐Lozada, D., Besson, S., Bogovic, J., Bragantini, J., Brown, E. M., Burel, J.‐M., Casas Moreno, X., De Medeiros, G., Diel, E. E., Gault, D., Ghosh, S. S., Gold, I., Halchenko, Y. O., Hartley, M., Horsfall, D., Keller, M. S., Kittisopikul, M., Kovacs, G., …Swedlow, J. R. (2023). OME‐Zarr: A cloud‐optimized bioimaging file format with international community support. Histochemistry and Cell Biology, 160(3), 223–251. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00418‐023‐02209‐1
Brooks, M. (2023). How open‐source software could finally get the world's microscopes speaking the same language. Nature, 622(7981), 206–208. https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586‐023‐03064‐9
Huawei Technologies Co., Ltd.. (2023). Storage basics in cloud computing. In Cloud computing technology (pp. 197–250). Springer Nature Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978‐981‐19‐3026‐3_5
Jonas, E., Pu, Q., Venkataraman, S., Stoica, I., & Recht, B. (2017). Occupy the cloud: Distributed computing for the 99%. In Proceedings of the 2017 Symposium on Cloud Computing. Santa Clara, California: Association for Computing Machinery, pp. 445–451. https://doi.org/10.1145/3127479.3128601
Suchodoletz, D., Hahn, U., Wiebelt, B., Glogowski, K., & Seifert, M. (2019). Storage infrastructures to support advanced scientific workflows. In M. Janczyk, D. v. Suchodoletz, & B. Wiebelt (Eds.), Proceedings of the 5th bwHPC Symposium. Universitätsbibliothek Tübingen. https://doi.org/10.15496/publikation‐29058
Abernathey, R. P., Augspurger, T., Anderson, B., Blackmon‐Luca, C. C., Crone, T. J., Gentemann, C. L., Hamman, J. J., Henderson, N., Lepore, C., McCaie, T. A., Robinson, N. H., & Signell, R. P. (2021). Cloud‐native repositories for big scientific data. Computing in Science & Engineering, 23(2), 26–35. https://doi.org/10.1109/MCSE.2021.3059437
Kuhn Cuellar, L., Friedrich, A., Gabernet, G., De La Garza, L., Fillinger, S., Seyboldt, A., Koch, T., Zur Oven‐Krockhaus, S., Wanke, F., Richter, S., Thaiss, W. M., Horger, M., Malek, N., Harter, K., Bitzer, M., & Nahnsen, S. (2022). A data management infrastructure for the integration of imaging and omics data in life sciences. BMC Bioinformatics [Electronic Resource], 23(1), 61. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12859‐022‐04584‐3
Mohr, C., Friedrich, A., Wojnar, D., Kenar, E., Polatkan, A. C., Codrea, M. C., Czemmel, S., Kohlbacher, O., & Nahnsen, S. (2018). qPortal: A platform for data‐driven biomedical research. PLoS ONE, 13(1), e0191603. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0191603
Sheffield, N. C., Bonazzi, V. R., Bourne, P. E., Burdett, T., Clark, T., Grossman, R. L., Spjuth, O., & Yates, A. D. (2022). From biomedical cloud platforms to microservices: Next steps in FAIR data and analysis. Scientific Data, 9(1), 553. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41597‐022‐01619‐5
Marée, R., Rollus, L., Stévens, B., Hoyoux, R., Louppe, G., Vandaele, R., Begon, J.‐M., Kainz, P., Geurts, P., & Wehenkel, L. (2016). Collaborative analysis of multi‐gigapixel imaging data using Cytomine. Bioinformatics, 32(9), 1395–1401. https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btw013
Saalfeld, S., Cardona, A., Hartenstein, V., & Tomančák, P. (2009). CATMAID: Collaborative annotation toolkit for massive amounts of image data. Bioinformatics, 25(15), 1984–1986. https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btp266
Kvilekval, K., Fedorov, D., Obara, B., Singh, A., & Manjunath, B. S. (2010). Bisque: A platform for bioimage analysis and management. Bioinformatics, 26(4), 544–552. https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btp699
Shi, B., Bourne, J., & Harris, K. M. (2011). SynapticDB, effective web‐based management and sharing of data from serial section electron microscopy. Neuroinformatics, 9(1), 39–57. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12021‐010‐9088‐4
Langenkämper, D., Zurowietz, M., Schoening, T., & Nattkemper, T. W. (2017). BIIGLE 2.0 – Browsing and annotating large marine image collections. Frontiers in Marine Science, 4, . https://doi.org/10.3389/fmars.2017.00083
Marcus, D. S., Olsen, T. R., Ramaratnam, M., & Buckner, R. L. (2007). The Extensible Neuroimaging Archive Toolkit: An informatics platform for managing, exploring, and sharing neuroimaging data. Neuroinformatics, 5(1), 11–34. https://doi.org/10.1385/ni:5:1:11
Swedlow, J. R., Goldberg, I., Brauner, E., & Sorger, P. K. (2003). Informatics and quantitative analysis in biological imaging. Science, 300(5616), 100–102. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1082602
Swedlow, J. R., Lewis, S. E., & Goldberg, I. G. (2006). Modelling data across labs, genomes, space and time. Nature Cell Biology, 8(11), 1190–1194. https://doi.org/10.1038/ncb1496
Wolstencroft, K., Owen, S., Krebs, O., Nguyen, Q., Stanford, N. J., Golebiewski, M., Weidemann, A., Bittkowski, M., An, L., Shockley, D., Snoep, J. L., Mueller, W., & Goble, C. (2015). SEEK: A systems biology data and model management platform. BMC Systems Biology, 9, 33. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12918‐015‐0174‐y
Prigent, S., Valades‐Cruz, C. A., Leconte, L., Maury, L., Salamero, J., & Kervrann, C. (2022). BioImageIT: Open‐source framework for integration of image data management with analysis. Nature Methods, 19(11), 1328–1330. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41592‐022‐01642‐9
Kunis, S., Bernhardt, K., & Hensel, M. (2023). Setting up a data management infrastructure for bioimaging. Biological Chemistry, 404(5), 433–439. https://doi.org/10.1515/hsz‐2022‐0304
Zobel, T., Weicher, S., & Wendt, J. (2022). OMERO for microscopy research data management. Wiley Analytical Science.
Rocca‐Serra, P., Brandizi, M., Maguire, E., Sklyar, N., Taylor, C., Begley, K., Field, D., Harris, S., Hide, W., Hofmann, O., Neumann, S., Sterk, P., Tong, W., & Sansone, S.‐A. (2010). ISA software suite: Supporting standards‐compliant experimental annotation and enabling curation at the community level. Bioinformatics, 26(18), 2354–2356. https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btq415
Sansone, S.‐A., Rocca‐Serra, P., Field, D., Maguire, E., Taylor, C., Hofmann, O., Fang, H., Neumann, S., Tong, W., Amaral‐Zettler, L., Begley, K., Booth, T., Bougueleret, L., Burns, G., Chapman, B., Clark, T., Coleman, L.‐A., Copeland, J., Das, S., …Hide, W. (2012). Toward interoperable bioscience data. Nature Genetics, 44(2), 121–126. https://doi.org/10.1038/ng.1054
Halchenko, Y., Meyer, K., Poldrack, B., Solanky, D., Wagner, A., Gors, J., Macfarlane, D., Pustina, D., Sochat, V., Ghosh, S., Mönch, C., Markiewicz, C., Waite, L., Shlyakhter, I., De La Vega, A., Hayashi, S., Häusler, C., Poline, J.‐B., Kadelka, T., …Hanke, M. (2021). DataLad: Distributed system for joint management of code, data, and their relationship. The Journal of Open Source Software, 6(63), 3262. https://doi.org/10.21105/joss.03262
Miura, K., & Nørrelykke, S. F. (2021). Reproducible image handling and analysis. Embo Journal, 40(3), e105889. https://doi.org/10.15252/embj.2020105889
Martin, C., & Blatt, M. (2013). Manipulation and misconduct in the handling of image data. Plant Cell, 25(9), 3147–3148. https://doi.org/10.1105/tpc.113.250980
Chen, J., Viana, M. P., & Rafelski, S. M. (2023). When seeing is not believing: Application‐appropriate validation matters for quantitative bioimage analysis. Nature Methods, 20(7), 968–970. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41592‐023‐01881‐4
Cromey, D. W. (2013). Digital images are data: and should be treated as such. Methods in Molecular Biology, 931, 1–27. https://doi.org/10.1007/978‐1‐62703‐056‐4_1
Cromey, D. W. (2010). Avoiding twisted pixels: Ethical guidelines for the appropriate use and manipulation of scientific digital images. Science and Engineering Ethics, 16(4), 639–667. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948‐010‐9201‐y
Peng, H. (2008). Bioimage informatics: A new area of engineering biology. Bioinformatics, 24(17), 1827–1836. https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btn346
Chen, W., Xia, X., Huang, Y., Chen, X., & Han, J.‐D. J. (2016). Bioimaging for quantitative phenotype analysis. Methods (San Diego, California), 102, 20–25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymeth.2016.01.017
Soltwedel, J. R., & Haase, R. (2023). Challenges and opportunities for bioimage analysis core‐facilities. Journal of Microscopy, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1111/jmi.13192
Cimini, B. A. (2024). Creating and troubleshooting microscopy analysis workflows: Common challenges and common solutions. Journal of Microscopy, 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1111/jmi.13288
Jamali, N., Dobson, E. T. A., Eliceiri, K. W., Carpenter, A. E., & Cimini, B. A. (2022). 2020 BioImage Analysis Survey: Community experiences and needs for the future. Biological Imaging, 1, e4. https://doi.org/10.1017/S2633903%D721000039
Chessel, A. (2017). An Overview of data science uses in bioimage informatics. Methods (San Diego, California), 115, 110–118. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymeth.2016.12.014
Levet, F., Carpenter, A. E., Eliceiri, K. W., Kreshuk, A., Bankhead, P., & Haase, R. (2021). Developing open‐source software for bioimage analysis: opportunities and challenges. F1000Res, 10, 302. https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.52531.1
Deschamps, J., Dalle Nogare, D., & Jug, F. (2023). Better research software tools to elevate the rate of scientific discovery or why we need to invest in research software engineering. Frontiers in Bioinformatics, 3, 1255159. https://doi.org/10.3389/fbinf.2023.1255159
Rubens, U., Mormont, R., Paavolainen, L., Bäcker, V., Pavie, B., Scholz, L. A., Michiels, G., Maška, M., Ünay, D., Ball, G., Hoyoux, R., Vandaele, R., Golani, O., Stanciu, S. G., Sladoje, N., Paul‐Gilloteaux, P., Marée, R., & Tosi, S. (2020). BIAFLOWS: A collaborative framework to reproducibly deploy and benchmark bioimage analysis workflows. Patterns (N Y), 1(3), 100040. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.patter.2020.100040
Schindelin, J., Arganda‐Carreras, I., Frise, E., Kaynig, V., Longair, M., Pietzsch, T., Preibisch, S., Rueden, C., Saalfeld, S., Schmid, B., Tinevez, J.‐Y., White, D. J., Hartenstein, V., Eliceiri, K., Tomancak, P., & Cardona, A. (2012). Fiji: An open‐source platform for biological‐image analysis. Nature Methods, 9(7), 676–682. https://doi.org/10.1038/nmeth.2019
Schindelin, J., Rueden, C. T., Hiner, M. C., & Eliceiri, K. W. (2015). The ImageJ ecosystem: An open platform for biomedical image analysis. Molecular Reproduction and Development, 82(7‐8), 518–529. https://doi.org/10.1002/mrd.22489
Jalili, V., Afgan, E., Gu, Q., Clements, D., Blankenberg, D., Goecks, J., Taylor, J., & Nekrutenko, A. (2020). The Galaxy platform for accessible, reproducible and collaborative biomedical analyses: 2020 update. Nucleic Acids Research, 48(W1), W395–W402. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkaa434
Afgan, E., Nekrutenko, A., Grüning, B. A., Blankenberg, D., Goecks, J., Schatz, M. C., Ostrovsky, A. E., Mahmoud, A., Lonie, A. J., Syme, A., Fouilloux, A., Bretaudeau, A., Nekrutenko, A., Kumar, A., Eschenlauer, A. C., Desanto, A. D., Guerler, A., Serrano‐Solano, B., Batut, B., …Briggs, P. J. (2022). The Galaxy platform for accessible, reproducible and collaborative biomedical analyses: 2022 update. Nucleic Acids Research, 50(W1), W345–W351. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkac247
Soiland‐Reyes, S., Sefton, P., Crosas, M., Castro, L. J., Coppens, F., Fernández, J. M., Garijo, D., Grüning, B., La Rosa, M., Leo, S., Ó Carragáin, E., Portier, M., Trisovic, A., Ro‐Crate Community, Groth, P., & Goble, C. (2022). Packaging research artefacts with RO‐Crate. Data Science, 5, 97–138. https://doi.org/10.3233/DS‐210053
David, R., Rybina, A., Burel, J.‐M., Heriche, J.‐K., Audergon, P., Boiten, J.‐W., Coppens, F., Crockett, S., Exter, K., Fahrner, S., Fratelli, M., Goble, C., Gormanns, P., Grantner, T., Grüning, B., Gurwitz, K. T., Hancock, J. M., Harmse, H., Holub, P., …Gribbon, P. (2023). Be sustainable″: EOSC‐Life recommendations for implementation of FAIR principles in life science data handling. Embo Journal, 42(23), e115008. https://doi.org/10.15252/embj.2023115008
Senft, R. A., Diaz‐Rohrer, B., Colarusso, P., Swift, L., Jamali, N., Jambor, H., Pengo, T., Brideau, C., Llopis, P. M., Uhlmann, V., Kirk, J., Gonzales, K. A., Bankhead, P., Evans, E. L., Eliceiri, K. W., & Cimini, B. A. (2023). A biologist's guide to planning and performing quantitative bioimaging experiments. PLoS Biology, 21(6), e3002167. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.3002167
Kent, W. (1983). A simple guide to five normal forms in relational database theory. Communications of the ACM, 26(2), 120–125. https://doi.org/10.1145/358024.358054
Scherr, T., Seiffarth, J., Wollenhaupt, B., Neumann, O., Schilling, M. P., Kohlheyer, D., Scharr, H., Nöh, K., & Mikut, R. (2022). microbeSEG: A deep learning software tool with OMERO data management for efficient and accurate cell segmentation. PLoS ONE, 17(11), e0277601. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0277601
Bankhead, P., Loughrey, M. B., Fernández, J. A., Dombrowski, Y., Mcart, D. G., Dunne, P. D., Mcquaid, S., Gray, R. T., Murray, L. J., Coleman, H. G., James, J. A., Salto‐Tellez, M., & Hamilton, P. W. (2017). QuPath: Open source software for digital pathology image analysis. Scientific Reports, 7(1), 16878. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598‐017‐17204‐5
Kluyver, T., Benjain, R.‐K., Fernando, P., Brian, G., Matthias, B., Jonathan, F., Kyle, K., Jessica, H., Jason, G., Sylvain, C., Paul, I., Damián, A., Safia, A., Carol, W., & Jupyter Development Team (2016). Jupyter Notebooks – A publishing format for reproducible computational workflows. In L. Fernando & B. Scmidt (Eds.), Positioning and power in academic publishing: Players, agents and agendas (pp. 87–90). IOS Press.
Ratamero, E. M., Burel, J.‐M., Moehl, C., Gay, G., Govek, K., Sobolewski, P., & Moore, W. ome/omero‐cli‐transfer: 1.0.0rc1 ‐ Figures, plugin interface, –binaries option, XML schemas. Zenodo. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10593027
Ratamero, E. M., Govek, K., Langerak, J. M., Sanchez, F. C., & Mellert, D. J. (2023). Easing OMERO adoption with ezomero. bioRxiv, pp. 2023.06.29.546930. https://doi.org/10.1101/2023.06.29.546930
Pouchin, P., Zoghlami, R., Valarcher, R., Delannoy, M., Carvalho, M., Belle, C., Mongy, M., Desset, S., & Brau, F. (2022). Easing batch image processing from OMERO: A new toolbox for ImageJ. F1000Res, 11, 392. https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.110385.2
Goldberg, I. G., Allan, C., Burel, J.‐M., Creager, D., Falconi, A., Hochheiser, H., Johnston, J., Mellen, J., Sorger, P. K., & Swedlow, J. R. (2005). The Open Microscopy Environment (OME) Data Model and XML file: Open tools for informatics and quantitative analysis in biological imaging. Genome Biology, 6(5), R47. https://doi.org/10.1186/gb‐2005‐6‐5‐r47
Li, S., Besson, S., Blackburn, C., Carroll, M., Ferguson, R. K., Flynn, H., Gillen, K., Leigh, R., Lindner, D., Linkert, M., Moore, W. J., Ramalingam, B., Rozbicki, E., Rustici, G., Tarkowska, A., Walczysko, P., Williams, E., Allan, C., Burel, J.‐M., …Swedlow, J. R. (2016). Metadata management for high content screening in OMERO. Methods (San Diego, California), 96, 27–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymeth.2015.10.006
Berman, H. M. (2000). The protein data bank. Nucleic Acids Research, 28(1), 235–242. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/28.1.235
Hingamp, P., Van Den Broek, A. E., Stoesser, G., & Baker, W. (1999). The EMBL Nucleotide Sequence Database. Contributing and accessing data. Molecular Biotechnology, 12(3), 255–267. https://doi.org/10.1385/MB:12:3:255
Benson, D. A., Cavanaugh, M., Clark, K., Karsch‐Mizrachi, I., Lipman, D. J., Ostell, J., & Sayers, E. W. (2013). GenBank. Nucleic Acids Research, 41(Database issue), D36–D42. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gks1195
Williams, E., Moore, J., Li, S. W., Rustici, G., Tarkowska, A., Chessel, A., Leo, S., Antal, B., Ferguson, R. K., Sarkans, U., Brazma, A., Carazo Salas, R. E., & Swedlow, J. R. (2017). The image data resource: A bioimage data integration and publication platform. Nature Methods, 14(8), 775–781. https://doi.org/10.1038/nmeth.4326
Tohsato, Y., Ho, K. H. L., Kyoda, K., & Onami, S. (2016). SSBD: A database of quantitative data of spatiotemporal dynamics of biological phenomena. Bioinformatics, 32(22), 3471–3479. https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btw417
Bajcsy, P., Bhattiprolu, S., Boerner, K., Cimini, B. A., Collinson, L., Ellenberg, J., Fiolka, R., Giger, M., Goscinski, W., Hartley, M., Hotaling, N., Horwitz, R., Jug, F., Kreshuk, A., Lundberg, E., Mathur, A., Narayan, K., Onami, S., Plant, A. L., …Keppler, A. (2024). Enabling global image data sharing in the life sciences. arXiv:2401.13023. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2401.13023
Gabelica, M., Bojčić, R., & Puljak, L. (2022). Many researchers were not compliant with their published data sharing statement: a mixed‐methods study. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 150, 33–41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2022.05.019
Vines, T. H., Andrew, R. L., Bock, D. G., Franklin, M. T., Gilbert, K. J., Kane, N. C., Moore, J.‐S., Moyers, B. T., Renaut, S., Rennison, D. J., Veen, T., & Yeaman, S. (2013). Mandated data archiving greatly improves access to research data. Faseb Journal, 27(4), 1304–1308. https://doi.org/10.1096/fj.12‐218164
Tedersoo, L., Küngas, R., Oras, E., Köster, K., Eenmaa, H., Leijen, Ä., Pedaste, M., Raju, M., Astapova, A., Lukner, H., Kogermann, K., & Sepp, T. (2021). Data sharing practices and data availability upon request differ across scientific disciplines. Scientific Data, 8(1), 192. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41597‐021‐00981‐0
Bik, E. M., Casadevall, A., & Fang, F. C. (2016). The prevalence of inappropriate image duplication in biomedical research publications. MBio, 7(3), e00809–e00816. https://doi.org/10.1128/mBio.00809‐16
Bik, E. M., Fang, F. C., Kullas, A. L., Davis, R. J., & Casadevall, A. (2018). Analysis and correction of inappropriate image duplication: The molecular and cellular biology experience. Molecular and Cellular Biology, 38(20), e00309–e00318. https://doi.org/10.1128/MCB.00309‐18
Marques, G., Pengo, T., & Sanders, M. A. (2020). Imaging methods are vastly underreported in biomedical research. Elife, 9, e55133. https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.55133
Colavizza, G., Hrynaszkiewicz, I., Staden, I., Whitaker, K., & Mcgillivray, B. (2020). The citation advantage of linking publications to research data. PLoS ONE, 15(4), e0230416. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0230416
Duke, C. S., & Porter, J. H. (2013). The ethics of data sharing and reuse in biology. Bioscience, 63(6), 483–489. https://doi.org/10.1525/bio.2013.63.6.10
Margnoi, T., & Tsiavos, P. (2018). Toolkit for researchers on legal issues. Zenodo. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.2574619
Guidance for Developing a Research Data Management (RDM) Policy. (2017). In LEARN Toolkit of Best Practice for Research Data Management. UCL Discovery. https://doi.org/10.14324/000.learn.27
Tsoukala, V., Angelaki, M., Kalaitzi, V., Wessels, B., Price, L., Taylor, M. J., Smallwood, R., Linde, P., Sondervan, J., Reilly, S., Noorman, M., Wyatt, Bigagli, S., Finn, L., Sveinsdottir, R., & Wadhwa, T. K. (2016). RECODE: Policy recommendations for open access to research data. Zenodo. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.50863
Van den Veerle, E., Knight, G., Vlad, A., Radler, B., Tenopir, C., Leon, D., Frank, M., Jimmy, W., & Louise, C. (2016). Survey of Wellcome researchers and their attitudes to open research. Wellcome Trust. Journal Contribution. https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.4055448.v1
Campbell, H. A., Micheli‐Campbell, M. A., & Udyawer, V. (2019). Early career researchers embrace data sharing. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 34(2), 95–98. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2018.11.010
Schmied, C., Nelson, M. S., Avilov, S., Bakker, G.‐J., Bertocchi, C., Bischof, J., Boehm, U., Brocher, J., Carvalho, M. T., Chiritescu, C., Christopher, J., Cimini, B. A., Conde‐Sousa, E., Ebner, M., Ecker, R., Eliceiri, K., Fernandez‐Rodriguez, J., Gaudreault, N., Gelman, L., …Jambor, H. K. (2023). Community‐developed checklists for publishing images and image analyses. Nature Methods, ArXiv, arXiv:2302.07005v2. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41592‐023‐01987‐9
Taatjes, D. J., Koji, T., Schrader, M., & Roth, J. (2023). Editorial: Histochemistry and Cell Biology implements new submission guidelines for image presentation and image analysis. Histochemistry and Cell Biology, 160(6), 495–497. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00418‐023‐02247‐9
Jambor, H. K. (2023). A community‐driven approach to enhancing the quality and interpretability of microscopy images. Journal of Cell Science, 136(24). https://doi.org/10.1242/jcs.261837
Möller, K., Amber, V., & Kemmer, I. (2022). In vivo SPIM and confocal imaging of neuronal efferocytosis by microglia. EMBL‐EBI: BioImage Archive.
Nöth, J., et al. (2023). Analysis of vascular disruption in zebrafish embryos as an endpoint to predict developmental toxicity – High Content Screening Raw Data (OBI/WIK strain). EMBL‐EBI: BioImage Archive.
Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft. (2019). Guidelines for Safeguarding Good Research Practice. Code of Conduct. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3923602
Whitlock, M. C., Mcpeek, M. A., Rausher, M. D., Rieseberg, L., & Moore, A. J. (2010). Data archiving. American Naturalist, 175(2), 145–146. https://doi.org/10.1086/650340
Pernet, C., Svarer, C., Blair, R., Van Horn, J. D., & Poldrack, R. A. (2023). On the long‐term archiving of research data. Neuroinformatics, 21(2), 243–246. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12021‐023‐09621‐x
Calhoun, S. P., Akin, D., Zimmerman, B., & Neeman, H. (2019). Large scale research data archiving: Training for an inconvenient technology. Journal of Computational Science, 36, 100523. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jocs.2016.07.005
Rubens, U., Hoyoux, R., Vanosmael, L., Ouras, M., Tasset, M., Hamilton, C., Longuespée, R., & Marée, R. (2018). Cytomine: Toward an open and collaborative software platform for digital pathology bridged to molecular investigations. PROTEOMICS – Clinical Applications, 13(1). https://doi.org/10.1002/prca.201800057
Moore, J., & Kunis, S. (2023). NFDI4BIOIMAGE: Perspective for a national bioimaging standard. In SWAT4HCLS 2023: The 14th International Conference on Semantic Web Applications and Tools for Health Care and Life Sciences. CEUR Workshop Proceedings.
Hoh, J. H., Heinz, W. F., & Werbin, J. L. (2013). Spatial information dynamics during early zebrafish development. Developmental Biology, 377(1), 126–137. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ydbio.2013.02.005
Thurley, K., Wu, L. F., & Altschuler, S. J. (2018). Modeling cell‐to‐cell communication networks using response‐time distributions. Cell Systems, 6(3), 355–367 e5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cels.2018.01.016
Zivanov, J., Nakane, T., Forsberg, B. O., Kimanius, D., Hagen, W. J. H., Lindahl, E., & Scheres, S. H. W. (2018). New tools for automated high‐resolution cryo‐EM structure determination in RELION‐3. Elife, 7, e42166. https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.42166
Driscoll, M. K., & Zaritsky, A. (2021). Data science in cell imaging. Journal of Cell Science, 134(7), jcs254292. https://doi.org/10.1242/jcs.254292
Prior, F., Almeida, J., Kathiravelu, P., Kurc, T., Smith, K., Fitzgerald, T. J., & Saltz, J. (2020). Open access image repositories: High‐quality data to enable machine learning research. Clinical Radiology, 75(1), 7–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crad.2019.04.002
Conrad, R., & Narayan, K. (2023). Instance segmentation of mitochondria in electron microscopy images with a generalist deep learning model trained on a diverse dataset. Cell Systems, 14(1), 58–71 e5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cels.2022.12.006
Pachitariu, M., & Stringer, C. (2022). Cellpose 2.0: How to train your own model. Nature Methods, 19(12), 1634–1641. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41592‐022‐01663‐4
Zullino, S., Paglialonga, A., Dastrù, W., Longo, D. L., & Aime, S. (2022). XNAT‐PIC: Extending XNAT to preclinical imaging centers. Journal of Digital Imaging, 35(4), 860–875. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10278‐022‐00612‐z
Schmidt, C., Bortolomeazzi, M., Boissonnet, T., Fortmann‐Grote, C., Dohle, J., Zentis, P., Kandpal, N., Kunis, S., Zobel, T., Weidtkamp‐Peters, S., & Ferrando‐May, E. (2023). I3D:bio's OMERO training material: Re‐usable, adjustable, multi‐purpose slides for local user training. Zenodo. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8323588
Silkotch, C., Garcia‐Milian, R., & Hersey, D. (2023). Partnering with health sciences libraries to address challenges in bioimaging data management and sharing. Histochemistry and Cell Biology, 160(3), 193–198. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00418‐023‐02198‐1
Musen, M. A., O'connor, M. J., Schultes, E., Martínez‐Romero, M., Hardi, J., & Graybeal, J. (2022). Modeling community standards for metadata as templates makes data FAIR. Scientific Data, 9(1), 696. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41597‐022‐01815‐3
Bialy, N., Alber, F., Andrews, B., Angelo, M., Beliveau, B., Bintu, L., Boettiger, A., Boehm, U., Brown, C. M., Maina, M. B., Chambers, J. J., Cimini, B. A., Eliceiri, K., Errington, R., Faklaris, O., Gaudreault, N., Germain, R. N., Goscinski, W., Grunwald, D., …Strambio‐De‐Castillia, C. (2024). Harmonizing the generation and pre‐publication stewardship of FAIR image data. arXiv preprint arXiv:2401.13022.
Wendelborn, C., Anger, M., & Schickhardt, C. (2023). What is data stewardship? Towards a comprehensive understanding. Journal of Biomedical Informatics, 140, 104337. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbi.2023.104337
Rothfritz, L. (2021). Data stewardship als boundary‐work. Bausteine Forschungsdatenmanagement, (3), 106–118. https://doi.org/10.17192/bfdm.2021.3.8344
Navale, V., & Mcauliffe, M. (2018). Long‐term preservation of biomedical research data. F1000Res, 7, 1353. https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.16015.1
Nöth, J., Busch, W., Tal, T., Lai, C., Ambekar, A., Kießling, T. R., & Scholz, S. (2024). Analysis of vascular disruption in zebrafish embryos as an endpoint to predict developmental toxicity. Archives of Toxicology, 98(2), 537–549. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00204‐023‐03633‐x
Jannasch, A., Welzel, C., Pablik, J., Von Hauff, E., Galli, R., Rix, J., Schauer, A., Dittfeld, C., & Tugtekin, S.‐M. (2024). In vivo application of a glutaraldehyde‐free, UVA/riboflavin cross‐linked bovine pericardium confirms suitability for cardiovascular substitutes. APL Materials, 12(1), 011104. https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0182672