Robotic assisted versus laparoscopic surgery for deep endometriosis: a meta-analysis of current evidence.
Endometriosis
Image-guided surgery
Minimally Invasive surgery
RAS
Robotic assisted surgery
Robotic platforms
Journal
Journal of robotic surgery
ISSN: 1863-2491
Titre abrégé: J Robot Surg
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101300401
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
16 May 2024
16 May 2024
Historique:
received:
19
02
2024
accepted:
14
04
2024
medline:
16
5
2024
pubmed:
16
5
2024
entrez:
16
5
2024
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Endometriosis is a benign inflammatory onco-mimetic disease affecting 10-15% of women in the world. When it is refractory to medical treatments, surgery may be required. Usually, laparoscopy is the preferred approach, but robotic surgery has gained popularity in the last 15 years. This study aims to evaluate the safety and efficacy of robotic-assisted laparoscopic surgery (RAS) versus conventional laparoscopic surgery (LPS) in the treatment of endometriosis. This study adheres to PRISMA guidelines and is registered with PROSPERO. Studies reporting perioperative data comparing RAS and LPS surgery in patients with endometriosis querying PubMed, Google Scholar and ClinicalTrials.gov were included in the analysis. The Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies 2 tool (QUADAS-2) was used for the quality assessment of the selected articles. Fourteen studies were identified, including 2709 patients with endometriosis stage I-IV for the meta-analysis. There were no significant differences between RAS and LPS in terms of intraoperative and postoperative complications, conversion rate and estimated blood loss. However, patients in the RAS group have a longer operative time (p < 0.0001) and longer hospital stay (p = 0.020) than those in the laparoscopic group. Robotic surgery is not inferior to laparoscopy in patients with endometriosis in terms of surgical outcomes; however, RAS requires longer operative times and longer hospital stay. The benefits of robotic surgery should be sought in the easiest potential integration of robotic platforms with new technologies. Prospective studies comparing laparoscopy to the new robotic systems are desirable for greater robustness of scientific evidence.
Identifiants
pubmed: 38753180
doi: 10.1007/s11701-024-01954-2
pii: 10.1007/s11701-024-01954-2
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Meta-Analysis
Comparative Study
Review
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
212Informations de copyright
© 2024. The Author(s).
Références
Giudice LC (2010) Clinical practice. Endometr N Engl J Med 362(25):2389–2398
doi: 10.1056/NEJMcp1000274
Ianieri MM, Raimondo D, Rosati A, Cocchi L, Trozzi R, Maletta M et al (2022) Impact of nerve-sparing posterolateral parametrial excision for deep infiltrating endometriosis on postoperative bowel, urinary, and sexual function. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 159(1):152–159
doi: 10.1002/ijgo.14089
pubmed: 34995374
pmcid: 9542420
Ianieri MM, Buca DIP, Panaccio P, Cieri M, Francomano F, Liberati M (2017) Retroperitoneal endometriosis in postmenopausal woman causing deep vein thrombosis: case report and review of the literature. Clin Exp Obstet Gynecol 44(1):148–150
doi: 10.12891/ceog3306.2017
pubmed: 29714887
Dunselman GAJ, Vermeulen N, Becker C, Calhaz-Jorge C, D’Hooghe T, De Bie B et al (2014) ESHRE guideline: management of women with endometriosis. Hum Reprod 29(3):400–412
doi: 10.1093/humrep/det457
pubmed: 24435778
Soto E, Luu TH, Liu X, Magrina JF, Wasson MN, Einarsson JI et al (2017) Laparoscopy vs. robotic surgery for endometriosis (LAROSE): a multicenter, randomized, controlled trial. Fertil Steril 107(4):996-1002.e3
doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2016.12.033
pubmed: 28238489
Roman H, Dennis T, Grigoriadis G, Merlot B (2022) Robotic management of diaphragmatic endometriosis in 10 steps. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 29(6):707–708
doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2022.03.005
pubmed: 35304303
Ianieri MM, Nardone ADC, Pavone M, Benvenga G, Pafundi MP, Campolo F et al (2023) Are ureterolysis for deep endometriosis really all the same? an anatomical classification proposal for ureterolysis: a single-center experience. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 162:1010–1019
doi: 10.1002/ijgo.14790
pubmed: 37069787
Pavone M, Marescaux J, Seeliger B (2023) Current status of robotic abdominopelvic surgery. Show-Chwan Med J 22(3):467473. https://doi.org/10.30185/scmj.202307/pp.0003
Restaino S, Mereu L, Finelli A, Spina MR, Marini G, Catena U et al (2020) Robotic surgery vs laparoscopic surgery in patients with diagnosis of endometriosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Robot Surg 14(5):687–694
doi: 10.1007/s11701-020-01061-y
pubmed: 32146573
Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG, PRISMA Group (2009) Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. PLoS Med 6(7):e1000097
doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1000097
pubmed: 19621072
pmcid: 2707599
Ouzzani M, Hammady H, Fedorowicz Z, Elmagarmid A (2016) Rayyan—a web and mobile app for systematic reviews. Syst Rev 5(1):210
doi: 10.1186/s13643-016-0384-4
pubmed: 27919275
pmcid: 5139140
American Society for Reproductive Medicine (1997) Revised American society for reproductive medicine classification of endometriosis: 1996. Fertil Steril 67(5):817–821
doi: 10.1016/S0015-0282(97)81391-X
Whiting PF, Rutjes AWS, Westwood ME, Mallett S, Deeks JJ, Reitsma JB et al (2011) QUADAS-2: a revised tool for the quality assessment of diagnostic accuracy studies. Ann Intern Med 155(8):529–536
doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-155-8-201110180-00009
pubmed: 22007046
Nezhat C, Lewis M, Kotikela S, Veeraswamy A, Saadat L, Hajhosseini B et al (2010) Robotic versus standard laparoscopy for the treatment of endometriosis. Fertil Steril 94(7):2758–2760
doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2010.04.031
pubmed: 20537632
Dulemba JF, Pelzel C, Hubert HB (2013) Retrospective analysis of robot-assisted versus standard laparoscopy in the treatment of pelvic pain indicative of endometriosis. J Robot Surg 7(2):163–169
doi: 10.1007/s11701-012-0361-4
pubmed: 27000908
Hiltunen J, Eloranta ML, Lindgren A, Keski-Nisula L, Anttila M, Sallinen H (2021) Robotic-assisted laparoscopy is a feasible method for resection of deep infiltrating endometriosis, especially in the rectosigmoid area. J Int Med Res 49(8):3000605211032788
doi: 10.1177/03000605211032788
pubmed: 34407685
Ferrier C, Le Gac M, Kolanska K, Boudy AS, Dabi Y, Touboul C et al (2022) Comparison of robot-assisted and conventional laparoscopy for colorectal surgery for endometriosis: a prospective cohort study. Int J Med Robot 18(3):e2382
doi: 10.1002/rcs.2382
pubmed: 35178837
Legendri S, Carbonnel M, Feki A, Moawad G, Aubry G, Vallée A, et al. Improvement of Post-Operative Quality of Life in Patients 2 Years after Minimally Invasive Surgery for Pain and Deep Infiltrating Endometriosis. J Clin Med [Internet]. 2022 [cited 10AD Jan 1];11(20). https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/36294462/ . Accessed 12 Dec 2023
Nezhat CR, Stevens A, Balassiano E, Soliemannjad R (2015) Robotic-assisted laparoscopy vs conventional laparoscopy for the treatment of advanced stage endometriosis. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 22(1):40–44
doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2014.06.002
pubmed: 24928738
Nezhat FR, Sirota I (2014) Perioperative outcomes of robotic assisted laparoscopic surgery versus conventional laparoscopy surgery for advanced-stage endometriosis. JSLS 18(4):e2014.00094
doi: 10.4293/JSLS.2014.00094
pubmed: 25489208
pmcid: 4254472
Magrina JF, Espada M, Kho RM, Cetta R, Chang YHH, Magtibay PM (2015) Surgical excision of advanced endometriosis: perioperative outcomes and impacting factors. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 22(6):944–950
doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2015.04.016
pubmed: 25917276
Le Gac M, Ferrier C, Touboul C, Owen C, Arfi A, Boudy AS et al (2020) Comparison of robotic versus conventional laparoscopy for the treatment of colorectal endometriosis: pilot study of an expert center. J Gynecol Obstet Hum Reprod 49:101885
doi: 10.1016/j.jogoh.2020.101885
Raimondo D, Alboni C, Orsini B, Aru AC, Farulla A, Maletta M et al (2021) Comparison of perioperative outcomes between standard laparoscopic and robot-assisted approach in patients with rectosigmoid endometriosis. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 100(9):1740–1746
doi: 10.1111/aogs.14170
pubmed: 33999408
Volodarsky-Perel A, Merlot B, Denost Q, Dennis T, Chanavaz-Lacheray I, Roman H (2023) Robotic-assisted versus conventional laparoscopic approach in patients with large rectal endometriotic nodule: the evaluation of safety and complications. Colorectal Dis 25(11):2233–2242
doi: 10.1111/codi.16785
pubmed: 37849058
Verrelli L, Merlot B, Chanavaz-Lacheray I, Braund S, D’Ancona G, Kade S, et al. Robotic surgery for severe endometriosis: a preliminary comparative study of cost estimation. J Minim Invasive Gynecol [Internet]. 2023 [cited 11AD Jan 1]. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/37935331/ . Accessed 12 Dec 2023
Crestani A, Bibaoune A, Le Gac M, Dabi Y, Kolanska K, Ferrier C, et al. Changes in hospital consumption of opioid and non-opioid analgesics after colorectal endometriosis surgery. J Robot Surg [Internet]. 2023 [cited 8AD Jan 1]. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/37606871/ . Accessed 12 Dec 2023
Hodneland E, Dybvik JA, Wagner-Larsen KS, Šoltészová V, Munthe-Kaas AZ, Fasmer KE et al (2021) Automated segmentation of endometrial cancer on MR images using deep learning. Sci Rep 8(11):179
doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-80068-9
Csirzó Á, Kovács DP, Szabó A, Fehérvári P, Jankó Á, Hegyi P et al (2023) Robot-assisted laparoscopy does not have demonstrable advantages over conventional laparoscopy in endometriosis surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Surg Endosc 38:529–539
doi: 10.1007/s00464-023-10587-9
pubmed: 38062181
pmcid: 10830624
Panico G, Mastrovito S, Campagna G, Monterossi G, Costantini B, Gioè A et al (2023) Robotic docking time with the Hugo™ RAS system in gynecologic surgery: a procedure independent learning curve using the cumulative summation analysis (CUSUM). J Robot Surg 17(5):2547–2554
doi: 10.1007/s11701-023-01693-w
pubmed: 37542580
pmcid: 10492716
Alboni C, Mattos LC, Marca AL, Raimondo D, Casadio P, Seracchioli R et al (2023) Robotic surgery and deep infiltrating endometriosis treatment: the state of art. CEOG 50(1):13
Pavone M, Seeliger B, Alesi MV, Goglia M, Marescaux J, Scambia G et al (2023) Initial experience of robotically assisted endometriosis surgery with a novel robotic system: first case series in a tertiary care center. Updates Surg. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13304-023-01724-z
doi: 10.1007/s13304-023-01724-z
pubmed: 38133880
Pavone M, Goglia M, Campolo F, Scambia G, Ianieri MM (2023) En-block butterfly excision of posterior compartment deep endometriosis: the first experience with the new surgical robot Hugo™ RAS. Facts Views Vis Obgyn 15(4):359–362
doi: 10.52054/FVVO.14.5.104
pubmed: 38128095
pmcid: 10832646
Sighinolfi MC, De Maria M, Meneghetti J, Felline M, Ceretti AP, Mosillo L et al (2024) The use of versius CMR for pelvic surgery: a multicentric analysis of surgical setup and early outcomes. World J Urol 42(1):31
doi: 10.1007/s00345-023-04730-3
pubmed: 38217724
pmcid: 10787883
Huang Y, Duan K, Koythong T, Patil NM, Fan D, Liu J et al (2022) Application of robotic single-site surgery with optional additional port for endometriosis: a single institution’s experience. J Robotic Surg 16(1):127–135
doi: 10.1007/s11701-021-01217-4
Fanfani F, Restaino S, Ercoli A, Chiantera V, Fagotti A, Gallotta V et al (2016) Robotic versus laparoscopic surgery in gynecology: which should we use? Minerva Ginecol 68(4):423–430
pubmed: 26633042
Lecointre L, Verde J, Goffin L, Venkatasamy A, Seeliger B, Lodi M et al (2022) Robotically assisted augmented reality system for identification of targeted lymph nodes in laparoscopic gynecological surgery: a first step toward the identification of sentinel node. Surg Endosc 36(12):9224–9233
doi: 10.1007/s00464-022-09409-1
pubmed: 35831676
Seeliger B, Diana M, Ruurda JP, Konstantinidis KM, Marescaux J, Swanström LL (2019) Enabling single-site laparoscopy: the SPORT platform. Surg Endosc 33(11):3696–3703
doi: 10.1007/s00464-018-06658-x
pubmed: 30623255
pmcid: 6795913
Mascagni P, Padoy N (2021) OR black box and surgical control tower: recording and streaming data and analytics to improve surgical care. J Visc Surg 158(3S):S18-25
doi: 10.1016/j.jviscsurg.2021.01.004
pubmed: 33712411
Pavone M, Spiridon IA, Lecointre L, Seeliger B, Scambia G, Venkatasamy A et al (2023) Full-field optical coherence tomography imaging for intraoperative microscopic extemporaneous lymph node assessment. Int J Gynecol Cancer. https://doi.org/10.1136/ijgc-2023-005050
doi: 10.1136/ijgc-2023-005050
pubmed: 37945058
Guerra F, Amore Bonapasta S, Annecchiarico M, Bongiolatti S, Coratti A (2015) Robot-integrated intraoperative ultrasound: initial experience with hepatic malignancies. Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol 24(6):345–349
doi: 10.3109/13645706.2015.1022558
pubmed: 25835093
Otani K, Kiyomatsu T, Ishimaru K, Kataoka A, Hayashi Y, Gohda Y (2023) Usefulness of real-time navigation using intraoperative ultrasonography for rectal cancer resection. Asian J Endosc Surg 16(4):819–821
doi: 10.1111/ases.13242
pubmed: 37574462
Simmonds C, Brentnall M, Lenihan J (2021) Evaluation of a novel universal robotic surgery virtual reality simulation proficiency index that will allow comparisons of users across any virtual reality simulation curriculum. Surg Endosc 35(10):5867–5875
doi: 10.1007/s00464-021-08609-5
pubmed: 34231063
Marcus HJ, Ramirez PT, Khan DZ, Layard Horsfall H, Hanrahan JG, Williams SC et al (2024) The IDEAL framework for surgical robotics: development, comparative evaluation and long-term monitoring. Nat Med 30(1):61–75
doi: 10.1038/s41591-023-02732-7
pubmed: 38242979