Differential toxic and antiepileptic features of Vigabatrin raceme and its enantiomers.

Acute toxicity Cognitive impairment EP Epilepsy VGB Vigabatrin

Journal

Brain research
ISSN: 1872-6240
Titre abrégé: Brain Res
Pays: Netherlands
ID NLM: 0045503

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
14 May 2024
Historique:
received: 28 02 2024
revised: 06 05 2024
accepted: 07 05 2024
medline: 17 5 2024
pubmed: 17 5 2024
entrez: 16 5 2024
Statut: aheadofprint

Résumé

The study aimed to investigate the potential pharmacological and toxicological differences between Vigabatrin (VGB) and its enantiomers S-VGB and R-VGB. The researchers focused on the toxic effects and antiepileptic activity of these compounds in a rat model. The epileptic rat model was established by intraperitoneal injection of kainic acid, and the antiepileptic activity of VGB, S-VGB, and VGB was observed, focusing on the improvements in seizure latency, seizure frequency and sensory, motor, learning and memory deficits in epileptic rats, as well as the hippocampal expression of key molecular associated with synaptic plasticity and the Wnt/β-catenin/GSK 3β signaling pathway. The acute toxic test was carried out and the LD50 was calculated, and tretinal damages in epileptic rats were also evaluated. The results showed that S-VGB exhibited stronger antiepileptic and neuroprotective effects with lower toxicity compared to VGB raceme. These findings suggest that S-VGB and VGB may modulate neuronal damage, glial cell activation, and synaptic plasticity related to epilepsy through the Wnt/β-catenin/GSK 3β signaling pathway. The study provides valuable insights into the potential differential effects of VGB enantiomers, highlighting the potential of S-VGB as an antiepileptic drug with reduced side effects. S-VGB has the highest antiepileptic effect and lowest toxicity compared to VGB and R-VGB.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
The study aimed to investigate the potential pharmacological and toxicological differences between Vigabatrin (VGB) and its enantiomers S-VGB and R-VGB. The researchers focused on the toxic effects and antiepileptic activity of these compounds in a rat model.
METHODS METHODS
The epileptic rat model was established by intraperitoneal injection of kainic acid, and the antiepileptic activity of VGB, S-VGB, and VGB was observed, focusing on the improvements in seizure latency, seizure frequency and sensory, motor, learning and memory deficits in epileptic rats, as well as the hippocampal expression of key molecular associated with synaptic plasticity and the Wnt/β-catenin/GSK 3β signaling pathway. The acute toxic test was carried out and the LD50 was calculated, and tretinal damages in epileptic rats were also evaluated.
RESULT RESULTS
The results showed that S-VGB exhibited stronger antiepileptic and neuroprotective effects with lower toxicity compared to VGB raceme. These findings suggest that S-VGB and VGB may modulate neuronal damage, glial cell activation, and synaptic plasticity related to epilepsy through the Wnt/β-catenin/GSK 3β signaling pathway. The study provides valuable insights into the potential differential effects of VGB enantiomers, highlighting the potential of S-VGB as an antiepileptic drug with reduced side effects.
CONCLUSION CONCLUSIONS
S-VGB has the highest antiepileptic effect and lowest toxicity compared to VGB and R-VGB.

Identifiants

pubmed: 38754803
pii: S0006-8993(24)00245-2
doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2024.148991
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

148991

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2024. Published by Elsevier B.V.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

Declaration of Competing Interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Auteurs

Song-Lin Xu (SL)

School of Pharmacy, Anhui Medical University, Hefei, China; Anhui Provincial Laboratory of Inflammatory and Immunity Disease, Anhui Institute of Innovative Drugs, Hefei, China; The Key Laboratory of Anti-inflammatory and Immune Medicine, Ministry of Education, Anhui Medical University, Hefei, China.

Min Fan (M)

School of Pharmacy, Anhui Medical University, Hefei, China; Anhui Provincial Laboratory of Inflammatory and Immunity Disease, Anhui Institute of Innovative Drugs, Hefei, China; The Key Laboratory of Anti-inflammatory and Immune Medicine, Ministry of Education, Anhui Medical University, Hefei, China.

Meng-Die Ma (MD)

School of Pharmacy, Anhui Medical University, Hefei, China; Anhui Provincial Laboratory of Inflammatory and Immunity Disease, Anhui Institute of Innovative Drugs, Hefei, China; The Key Laboratory of Anti-inflammatory and Immune Medicine, Ministry of Education, Anhui Medical University, Hefei, China.

Qiang Zheng (Q)

School of Pharmacy, Anhui Medical University, Hefei, China; Anhui Provincial Laboratory of Inflammatory and Immunity Disease, Anhui Institute of Innovative Drugs, Hefei, China; The Key Laboratory of Anti-inflammatory and Immune Medicine, Ministry of Education, Anhui Medical University, Hefei, China.

Peng-Quan Chen (PQ)

School of Pharmacy, Anhui Medical University, Hefei, China; Anhui Provincial Laboratory of Inflammatory and Immunity Disease, Anhui Institute of Innovative Drugs, Hefei, China; The Key Laboratory of Anti-inflammatory and Immune Medicine, Ministry of Education, Anhui Medical University, Hefei, China.

Ya-Dong Wei (YD)

School of Pharmacy, Anhui Medical University, Hefei, China; Anhui Provincial Laboratory of Inflammatory and Immunity Disease, Anhui Institute of Innovative Drugs, Hefei, China; The Key Laboratory of Anti-inflammatory and Immune Medicine, Ministry of Education, Anhui Medical University, Hefei, China.

Hui-Min Sun (HM)

School of Pharmacy, Anhui Medical University, Hefei, China; Anhui Provincial Laboratory of Inflammatory and Immunity Disease, Anhui Institute of Innovative Drugs, Hefei, China; The Key Laboratory of Anti-inflammatory and Immune Medicine, Ministry of Education, Anhui Medical University, Hefei, China.

Huai-Zhi Sun (HZ)

School of Pharmacy, Anhui Medical University, Hefei, China; Anhui Provincial Laboratory of Inflammatory and Immunity Disease, Anhui Institute of Innovative Drugs, Hefei, China; The Key Laboratory of Anti-inflammatory and Immune Medicine, Ministry of Education, Anhui Medical University, Hefei, China.

Jin-Fang Ge (JF)

School of Pharmacy, Anhui Medical University, Hefei, China; Anhui Provincial Laboratory of Inflammatory and Immunity Disease, Anhui Institute of Innovative Drugs, Hefei, China; The Key Laboratory of Anti-inflammatory and Immune Medicine, Ministry of Education, Anhui Medical University, Hefei, China. Electronic address: gejinfang@ahmu.edu.cn.

Classifications MeSH