Diagnostic yield of dental radiography and digital tomosynthesis for the identification of anatomic structures in cats.
cats
dental radiography
dentition
digital tomosynthesis
imaging
oral anatomy
Journal
Frontiers in veterinary science
ISSN: 2297-1769
Titre abrégé: Front Vet Sci
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101666658
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2024
2024
Historique:
received:
28
03
2024
accepted:
22
04
2024
medline:
17
5
2024
pubmed:
17
5
2024
entrez:
17
5
2024
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Digital tomosynthesis (DT) has emerged as a potential imaging modality for evaluating anatomic structures in veterinary medicine. This study aims to validate the diagnostic yield of DT in identifying predefined anatomic structures in feline cadaver heads, comparing it with conventional intraoral dental radiography (DR). A total of 16 feline cadaver heads were utilized to evaluate 19 predefined clinically relevant anatomic structures using both DR and DT. A semi-quantitative scoring system was employed to characterize the ability of each imaging method to identify these structures. DT demonstrated a significantly higher diagnostic yield compared to DR for all evaluated anatomic structures. Orthogonal DT imaging identified 13 additional anatomic landmarks compared to a standard 10-view feline set obtained via DR. Moreover, DT achieved statistically significant higher scores for each of these landmarks, indicating improved visualization over DR. These findings validate the utility of DT technology in reliably identifying clinically relevant anatomic structures in the cat skull. This validation serves as a foundation for further exploration of DT imaging in detecting dentoalveolar and other maxillofacial bony lesions and pathologies in cats.
Identifiants
pubmed: 38756522
doi: 10.3389/fvets.2024.1408807
pmc: PMC11096483
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
1408807Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2024 Soltero-Rivera, Nguyen, Goldschmidt, Hatcher and Arzi.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest. The author(s) declared that they were an editorial board member of Frontiers, at the time of submission. This had no impact on the peer review process and the final decision.