Clinical outcomes for olfactory neuroblastoma.
craniotomy
endoscopic skull base surgery
esthesioneuroblastoma
induction chemotherapy
olfactory neuroblastoma
postoperative radiotherapy
Journal
Frontiers in oncology
ISSN: 2234-943X
Titre abrégé: Front Oncol
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101568867
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2024
2024
Historique:
received:
30
10
2023
accepted:
26
03
2024
medline:
17
5
2024
pubmed:
17
5
2024
entrez:
17
5
2024
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Olfactory neuroblastoma (ONB) is a rare malignant tumor arising from the olfactory neuroepithelium. The standard of care for ONB is surgical resection; however, detailed treatment protocols vary by institution. Our treatment protocol consists of endoscopic skull base surgery (ESBS) for endoscopically resectable cases and induction chemotherapy followed by craniotomy combined with ESBS for locally advanced cases, with postoperative radiotherapy performed for all cases. Chemoradiotherapy (CRT) is performed in unresectable cases. In this study, we evaluate our treatment protocol and outcomes for ONB. A retrospective review of patients with ONB was conducted. Outcomes included survival outcomes and perioperative data. Fifteen patients (53.6%) underwent ESBS, 12 (42.9%) underwent craniotomy combined with ESBS, and 1 (3.6%) received CRT. The 5- and 10-year overall survival rates for all patients were 92.9% and 82.5%, respectively, with a median follow-up period of 81 months. The 5- and 10-year disease-free survival rates were 77.3% and 70.3%, respectively, and the 5- and 10-year local control rates were 88.2% and 80.2%, respectively. Patients undergoing ESBS demonstrated a significantly shorter operating time, period from operation to ambulation, hospitalization period, and less blood loss than those undergoing craniotomy combined with ESBS. Our treatment protocol was found to afford favorable outcomes. Patients who underwent endoscopic resection showed lower complication rates and better perioperative data than those who underwent craniotomy combined with ESBS. With appropriate case selection, ESBS is considered a useful approach for ONB.
Sections du résumé
Background
UNASSIGNED
Olfactory neuroblastoma (ONB) is a rare malignant tumor arising from the olfactory neuroepithelium. The standard of care for ONB is surgical resection; however, detailed treatment protocols vary by institution. Our treatment protocol consists of endoscopic skull base surgery (ESBS) for endoscopically resectable cases and induction chemotherapy followed by craniotomy combined with ESBS for locally advanced cases, with postoperative radiotherapy performed for all cases. Chemoradiotherapy (CRT) is performed in unresectable cases. In this study, we evaluate our treatment protocol and outcomes for ONB.
Methods
UNASSIGNED
A retrospective review of patients with ONB was conducted. Outcomes included survival outcomes and perioperative data.
Results
UNASSIGNED
Fifteen patients (53.6%) underwent ESBS, 12 (42.9%) underwent craniotomy combined with ESBS, and 1 (3.6%) received CRT. The 5- and 10-year overall survival rates for all patients were 92.9% and 82.5%, respectively, with a median follow-up period of 81 months. The 5- and 10-year disease-free survival rates were 77.3% and 70.3%, respectively, and the 5- and 10-year local control rates were 88.2% and 80.2%, respectively. Patients undergoing ESBS demonstrated a significantly shorter operating time, period from operation to ambulation, hospitalization period, and less blood loss than those undergoing craniotomy combined with ESBS.
Conclusion
UNASSIGNED
Our treatment protocol was found to afford favorable outcomes. Patients who underwent endoscopic resection showed lower complication rates and better perioperative data than those who underwent craniotomy combined with ESBS. With appropriate case selection, ESBS is considered a useful approach for ONB.
Identifiants
pubmed: 38756668
doi: 10.3389/fonc.2024.1329572
pmc: PMC11096780
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
1329572Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2024 Nakazono, Motegi, Suzuki, Nakamaru, Yamaguchi, Ishi, Kano, Tsushima, Honma, Suzuki, Kimura, Hamada, Taguchi, Shimizu, Mori, Yasuda, Aoyama, Kinoshita, Fujimura and Homma.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
AkH reports grants and non-financial support from Japan AMED, National Cancer Center Research and Development Fund; grants and personal fees from ONO Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd.; grants and personal fees from Taiho Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd.; grants and personal fees from KYORIN Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd.; grants and personal fees from Eisai; grants and personal fees from Mitsubishi Tanabe Pharma; grants from Otsuka Pharmaceutical Factory; grants from Iwasakidenshi Co., Ltd.;grants from Torii Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd.; personal fees from Bristol-Myers Squibb K.K.; personal fees from Bayer Yakuhin; personal fees from Merck Biopharma; personal fees from Eli Lilly Japan; personal fees from Sanofi; personal fees from Rakuten medical Japan; personal fees from Meiji pharma; personal fees from Demant Japan K.K.; personal fees from MSD K.K.; outside the submitted work. The remaining authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.