Comparative analysis of left ventricle function and deformation imaging in short and long axis plane in cardiac magnetic resonance imaging.

MRI cardiac function cardiac imaging deformation imaging feature tracking (CMR-FT) strain

Journal

Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine
ISSN: 2297-055X
Titre abrégé: Front Cardiovasc Med
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101653388

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
2024
Historique:
received: 19 02 2024
accepted: 18 04 2024
medline: 17 5 2024
pubmed: 17 5 2024
entrez: 17 5 2024
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Advancements in cardiac imaging have revolutionized our understanding of ventricular contraction. While ejection fraction (EF) is still the gold standard parameter to assess left ventricle (LV) function, strain imaging (SI) has provided valuable insights into ventricular mechanics. The lack of an integrative method including SI parameters in a single, validated formula may limit its use. Our aim was to compare different methods for evaluating global circumferential strain (GCS) and their relationship with global longitudinal strain (GLS) and EF in CMR and how the different evaluations fit in the theoretical relationship between EF and global strain. Retrospective monocenter study. Inclusion of every patient who underwent a CMR during a 15 months period with various clinical indication (congenital heart defect, myocarditis, cardiomyopathy). A minimum of three LV long-axis planes and a stack of short-axis slices covering the LV using classical steady-state free precession cine sequences. A single assessment of GLS on long axis (LAX) slices and a double assessment of GCS and EF with both short axis (SAX) and LAX slices were made by a single experienced CMR investigator. GCS-SAX and GCS-LAX were correlated ( This study highlights the need to integrate strain imaging techniques into clinical by incorporating strain parameters into EF calculations, because it gives a deeper understanding of cardiac mechanics.

Sections du résumé

Background UNASSIGNED
Advancements in cardiac imaging have revolutionized our understanding of ventricular contraction. While ejection fraction (EF) is still the gold standard parameter to assess left ventricle (LV) function, strain imaging (SI) has provided valuable insights into ventricular mechanics. The lack of an integrative method including SI parameters in a single, validated formula may limit its use. Our aim was to compare different methods for evaluating global circumferential strain (GCS) and their relationship with global longitudinal strain (GLS) and EF in CMR and how the different evaluations fit in the theoretical relationship between EF and global strain.
Methods UNASSIGNED
Retrospective monocenter study. Inclusion of every patient who underwent a CMR during a 15 months period with various clinical indication (congenital heart defect, myocarditis, cardiomyopathy). A minimum of three LV long-axis planes and a stack of short-axis slices covering the LV using classical steady-state free precession cine sequences. A single assessment of GLS on long axis (LAX) slices and a double assessment of GCS and EF with both short axis (SAX) and LAX slices were made by a single experienced CMR investigator.
Results UNASSIGNED
GCS-SAX and GCS-LAX were correlated (
Data conclusion UNASSIGNED
This study highlights the need to integrate strain imaging techniques into clinical by incorporating strain parameters into EF calculations, because it gives a deeper understanding of cardiac mechanics.

Identifiants

pubmed: 38756751
doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2024.1388171
pmc: PMC11097778
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

1388171

Informations de copyright

© 2024 Werner, Martins, Bertini, Bennati, Collia, Olivotto, Spaziani, Baruteau, Pedrizzetti and Raimondi.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

GP is scientific consultant for Medis Medical Imaging (Leiden, NL). The remaining authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Auteurs

Oscar Werner (O)

Pediatric Cardiology Unit, University Hospital Meyer, Florence, Italy.
Department of Pediatric Cardiology and Pediatric Cardiac Surgery, FHU PRECICARE, Nantes Université, CHU Nantes, Nantes, France.

Duarte Martins (D)

Pediatric and Adult Congenital Cardiology Unit, ASST Papa Giovanni XXIII, Bergamo, Italy.

Federico Bertini (F)

Pediatric Radiology Department, University Hospital Meyer, Florence, Italy.

Elena Bennati (E)

Pediatric Cardiology Unit, University Hospital Meyer, Florence, Italy.

Dario Collia (D)

Department of Engineering and Architecture, University of Trieste, Trieste, Italy.

Iacopo Olivotto (I)

Pediatric Cardiology Unit, University Hospital Meyer, Florence, Italy.

Gaia Spaziani (G)

Pediatric Cardiology Unit, University Hospital Meyer, Florence, Italy.

Alban-Elouen Baruteau (AE)

Department of Pediatric Cardiology and Pediatric Cardiac Surgery, FHU PRECICARE, Nantes Université, CHU Nantes, Nantes, France.

Gianni Pedrizzetti (G)

Department of Engineering and Architecture, University of Trieste, Trieste, Italy.

Francesca Raimondi (F)

Pediatric Cardiology Unit, University Hospital Meyer, Florence, Italy.
Pediatric and Adult Congenital Cardiology Unit, ASST Papa Giovanni XXIII, Bergamo, Italy.

Classifications MeSH