Tenofovir, emtricitabine, lamivudine and dolutegravir concentrations in plasma and urine following drug intake cessation in a randomized controlled directly observed pharmacokinetic trial to aid point-of-care testing.


Journal

The Journal of antimicrobial chemotherapy
ISSN: 1460-2091
Titre abrégé: J Antimicrob Chemother
Pays: England
ID NLM: 7513617

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
17 May 2024
Historique:
received: 19 01 2024
accepted: 23 04 2024
medline: 17 5 2024
pubmed: 17 5 2024
entrez: 17 5 2024
Statut: aheadofprint

Résumé

Poor adherence to ART and pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) can impact patient and public health. Point-of-care testing (POCT) may aid monitoring and adherence interventions. We report the pharmacokinetics of tenofovir [dosed as tenofovir disoproxil (TDF) and tenofovir alafenamide (TAF)], emtricitabine (FTC), lamivudine (3TC) and dolutegravir (DTG) in plasma and urine following drug cessation to evaluate adherence targets in urine for POCT. Subjects were randomized (1:1) to receive DTG/FTC/TAF or DTG/3TC/TDF for 15 days. Plasma and spot urine were collected on Day 15 (0-336 h post final dose). Drug concentrations were quantified using LC-MS, and non-linear mixed-effects models applied to determine drug disposition between matrices and relationship with relevant plasma [dolutegravir protein-adjusted 90% inhibitory concentration (PA-IC90 = 64 ng/mL) and minimum effective concentration (MEC = 324 ng/mL)] and urinary thresholds [tenofovir disoproxil fumarate 1500 ng/mL]. Of 30 individuals enrolled, 29 were included (72% female at birth, 90% Caucasian). Median (range) predicted time to plasma dolutegravir PA-IC90 and MEC were 83.5 (41.0-152) and 49.0 h (23.7-78.9), corresponding to geometric mean (90%) urine concentrations of 5.42 (4.37-6.46) and 27.4 ng/mL (22.1-32.7). Tenofovir in urine reached 1500 ng/mL by 101 h (58.6-205) with an equivalent plasma concentration of 6.20 ng/mL (4.21-8.18). These data support use of a urinary tenofovir threshold of <1500 ng/mL (tenofovir disoproxil fumarate-based regimens) as a marker of three or more missed doses for a POCT platform. However, due to low dolutegravir concentrations in urine, POCT would be limited to a readout of recent dolutegravir intake (one missed dose).

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
Poor adherence to ART and pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) can impact patient and public health. Point-of-care testing (POCT) may aid monitoring and adherence interventions.
OBJECTIVES OBJECTIVE
We report the pharmacokinetics of tenofovir [dosed as tenofovir disoproxil (TDF) and tenofovir alafenamide (TAF)], emtricitabine (FTC), lamivudine (3TC) and dolutegravir (DTG) in plasma and urine following drug cessation to evaluate adherence targets in urine for POCT.
METHODS METHODS
Subjects were randomized (1:1) to receive DTG/FTC/TAF or DTG/3TC/TDF for 15 days. Plasma and spot urine were collected on Day 15 (0-336 h post final dose). Drug concentrations were quantified using LC-MS, and non-linear mixed-effects models applied to determine drug disposition between matrices and relationship with relevant plasma [dolutegravir protein-adjusted 90% inhibitory concentration (PA-IC90 = 64 ng/mL) and minimum effective concentration (MEC = 324 ng/mL)] and urinary thresholds [tenofovir disoproxil fumarate 1500 ng/mL].
RESULTS RESULTS
Of 30 individuals enrolled, 29 were included (72% female at birth, 90% Caucasian). Median (range) predicted time to plasma dolutegravir PA-IC90 and MEC were 83.5 (41.0-152) and 49.0 h (23.7-78.9), corresponding to geometric mean (90%) urine concentrations of 5.42 (4.37-6.46) and 27.4 ng/mL (22.1-32.7). Tenofovir in urine reached 1500 ng/mL by 101 h (58.6-205) with an equivalent plasma concentration of 6.20 ng/mL (4.21-8.18).
CONCLUSIONS CONCLUSIONS
These data support use of a urinary tenofovir threshold of <1500 ng/mL (tenofovir disoproxil fumarate-based regimens) as a marker of three or more missed doses for a POCT platform. However, due to low dolutegravir concentrations in urine, POCT would be limited to a readout of recent dolutegravir intake (one missed dose).

Identifiants

pubmed: 38758205
pii: 7676000
doi: 10.1093/jac/dkae147
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Subventions

Organisme : National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases
Organisme : NIH HHS
ID : 5R01AI122301-03
Pays : United States

Informations de copyright

© The Author(s) 2024. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of British Society for Antimicrobial Chemotherapy.

Auteurs

Laura J Else (LJ)

Department of Molecular and Clinical Pharmacology, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.

Laura Dickinson (L)

Department of Molecular and Clinical Pharmacology, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.

Stacey Edick (S)

Division of Infectious Diseases, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.

Ashley Zyhowski (A)

Magee-Womens Research Institute, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.

Ken Ho (K)

Division of Infectious Diseases, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.

Leslie Meyn (L)

Division of Infectious Diseases, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.

Sujan Dilly-Penchala (S)

Department of Molecular and Clinical Pharmacology, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.

Beth Thompson (B)

Department of Molecular and Clinical Pharmacology, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.

Victoria Shaw (V)

Department of Molecular and Clinical Pharmacology, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.

Saye Khoo (S)

Department of Molecular and Clinical Pharmacology, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.

Rhonda M Brand (RM)

Division of Infectious Diseases, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
Magee-Womens Research Institute, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.

Classifications MeSH