Junior surgeon learning curve for performing digital planning of a first-line uncemented total hip prothesis.
2D planning
Learning curve
Total hip arthroplasty
Journal
European journal of orthopaedic surgery & traumatology : orthopedie traumatologie
ISSN: 1432-1068
Titre abrégé: Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol
Pays: France
ID NLM: 9518037
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
17 May 2024
17 May 2024
Historique:
received:
04
03
2024
accepted:
08
05
2024
medline:
17
5
2024
pubmed:
17
5
2024
entrez:
17
5
2024
Statut:
aheadofprint
Résumé
Preoperative digital planning of total hip arthroplasty (THA) anticipates difficulties while increasing implant survival. The objective was to establish the learning curve to produce a reliable and reproducible preoperative planning for THA. We hypothesize that a learning curve exists for planning, and we want to determine the number of procedures required to accomplish it. This prospective study included patients for THA from 02/11/2019 to 01/11/2022. Ten junior (Juniors) and senior surgeons (Seniors) had received dedicated training in the use of the software. Modeling was done blindly by Juniors and Senior before surgery on a standardized front pelvis X-ray (mediCAD 2D Classic Hospital software). Statistical analyses to establish the learning curve were done to compare the Juniors and Seniors. 60% of the Juniors achieved competence after 31.5 ± 12.9 [14-54] planning sessions for the acetabular implant, and 80% after 30.3 ± 8.3 [17-40] planning sessions for the femoral implant. Femoral neck size was achieved by all ten Juniors after 23.1 ± 6.8 [17-38] planning. The offset was correctly restored on the plan by 30% of the Juniors after 33.5 ± 11.6 [18-46] planning. There is a learning curve for 2D planning of uncemented THA. The different planning items seem to have different learning curves. Compared to Seniors, the completion of 75 planning sessions is not sufficient in totality. The competence of the Juniors for the acetabular implant, the length of the neck and the size of the femoral stem are mostly acquired before 75 sessions. Prospective study-Level II.
Identifiants
pubmed: 38758389
doi: 10.1007/s00590-024-03986-8
pii: 10.1007/s00590-024-03986-8
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Informations de copyright
© 2024. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag France SAS, part of Springer Nature.
Références
Learmonth ID, Young C, Rorabeck C (2007) The operation of the century: total hip replacement. The Lancet 370:1508–1519. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(07)60457-7
doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(07)60457-7
Maitama Implant factors that might influence components’ survival in primary total hip arthroplasty. https://www.npmj.org/article.asp?issn=1117-1936;year=2022;volume=29;issue=1;spage=1;epage=5;aulast=Maitama . Accessed 8 Jan 2023
Viricel C, Boyer B, Philippot R et al (2022) Survie et complications des prothèses totales de hanche à double mobilité de troisième génération avec du polyéthylène non réticulé chez des patients de moins de 55 ans. Rev Chir Orthopédique Traumatol 108:161–168. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rcot.2022.01.011
doi: 10.1016/j.rcot.2022.01.011
Thirion T, Georis P, Gillet P (2019) Preoperative planning interest of a total hip prosthesis. Rev Med Liege 74:593–597
pubmed: 31729848
Knight JL, Atwater RD (1992) Preoperative planning for total hip arthroplasty. Quantitating its utility and precision. J Arthroplasty 7:403–409. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0883-5403(07)80031-3
doi: 10.1016/s0883-5403(07)80031-3
pubmed: 1431923
Eggli S, Pisan M, Müller ME (1998) The value of preoperative planning for total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Br 80-B:382–390. https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.80B3.0800382
doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.80B3.0800382
Davila JA, Kransdorf MJ, Duffy GP (2006) Surgical planning of total hip arthroplasty: accuracy of computer-assisted EndoMap software in predicting component size. Skeletal Radiol 35:390–393. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00256-006-0106-4
doi: 10.1007/s00256-006-0106-4
pubmed: 16572344
Wright TP (1936) Factors affecting the cost of airplanes. J Aeronaut Sci 3:122–128. https://doi.org/10.2514/8.155
doi: 10.2514/8.155
Carter LW, Stovall DO, Young TR (1995) Determination of accuracy of preoperative templating of noncemented femoral prostheses. J Arthroplasty 10:507–513. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0883-5403(05)80153-6
doi: 10.1016/S0883-5403(05)80153-6
pubmed: 8523011
Franken M, Grimm B, Heyligers I (2010) A comparison of four systems for calibration when templating for total hip replacement with digital radiography. J Bone Joint Surg Br 92-B:136–141. https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.92B1.22257
doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.92B1.22257
Sinclair VF, Wilson J, Jain NPM, Knowles D (2014) Assessment of accuracy of marker ball placement in pre-operative templating for total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 29:1658–1660. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2014.03.013
doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2014.03.013
pubmed: 24736293
Charnley J (1979) Low friction arthroplasty of the hip: theory and practice. Springer-Verlag, Berlin
doi: 10.1007/978-3-642-67013-8
Jung S, Neuerburg C, Kappe T et al (2012) Validity of digital templating in total hip arthroplasty: impact of stem design and planner’s experience. Z Orthopadie Unfallchirurgie 150:404–408. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0031-1298386
doi: 10.1055/s-0031-1298386
Turgay EF, El Zayat BF, Heyse TJ, Timmesfeld N, Fuchs-Winkelmann S, Schmitt J (2011) Precision of preoperative digital templating in total hip arthroplasty. Acta orthopaedica Belgica 77:616–21
Della Valle AG, Padgett DE, Salvati EA (2005) Preoperative planning for primary total hip arthroplasty. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 13:455–462. https://doi.org/10.5435/00124635-200511000-00005
doi: 10.5435/00124635-200511000-00005
pubmed: 16272270
Mittag F, Ipach I, Schaefer R et al (2012) Predictive value of preoperative digital templating in THA depends on the surgical experience of the performing physician. Orthopedics 35:e144-147. https://doi.org/10.3928/01477447-20120123-14
doi: 10.3928/01477447-20120123-14
pubmed: 22310397
Dammerer D, Keiler A, Herrnegger S et al (2021) Accuracy of digital templating of uncemented total hip arthroplasty at a certified arthroplasty center: a retrospective comparative study. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 142:2471–2480. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-021-03836-w
doi: 10.1007/s00402-021-03836-w
pubmed: 33725193
pmcid: 9474525
Kearney R, Shaikh AH, O’Byrne JM (2013) The accuracy and inter-observer reliability of acetate templating in total hip arthroplasty. Ir J Med Sci 182:409–414. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11845-013-0901-6
doi: 10.1007/s11845-013-0901-6
pubmed: 23354493
Thirion T, Georis P, Szecel Z, Gillet P (2020) Preoperative planning of total hip arthroplasty. Must this essential part of the procedure be necessarily performed by the orthopedic surgeon? A prospective study about 100 Corail
pubmed: 33861912
Waldstein W, Bouché PA, Pottmann C et al (2021) Quantitative and individualized assessment of the learning curve in preoperative planning of the acetabular cup size in primary total hip arthroplasty. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 141:1601–1608. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-021-03848-6
doi: 10.1007/s00402-021-03848-6
pubmed: 33709204
pmcid: 8354891
Biau DJ, Meziane M, Bhumbra RS et al (2011) Monitoring the quality of total hip replacement in a tertiary care department using a cumulative summation statistical method (CUSUM). J Bone Joint Surg Br 93:1183–1188. https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.93B9.26436
doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.93B9.26436
pubmed: 21911528
Bertz A, Indrekvam K, Ahmed M et al (2012) Validity and reliability of preoperative templating in total hip arthroplasty using a digital templating system. Skeletal Radiol 41:1245–1249. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00256-012-1431-4
doi: 10.1007/s00256-012-1431-4
pubmed: 22588597
Sershon RA, Diaz A, Bohl DD, Levine BR (2017) Effect of body mass index on digital templating for total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 32:1024–1026. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2016.09.020
doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2016.09.020
pubmed: 27776900
González Della Valle A, Comba F, Taveras N, Salvati EA (2008) The utility and precision of analogue and digital preoperative planning for total hip arthroplasty. Int Orthop 32:289–294. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-006-0317-2
doi: 10.1007/s00264-006-0317-2
pubmed: 17404731